Swine Flu Presents Grocery Store Marketing Opportunity
Reader Ian spotted this display at his local supermarket.
Ian says:
I saw this today at the Shaw's Supermarket in Goffstown, NH. They must have a surplus of hand sanitizers and masks.
Encouraging good hygiene was never so profitable. We wonder how often they have to remove bacon from the display.
Post a comment
Comments:
@Vandelay Import Export: Better the head quarters than hind quarters, I suppose. (Hindquarters also one word, I think . . .)
@VOIDMunashii: Ohhhh,,,maybe next they'll give 10% off to any Seniors that made it through the 1918 flu epidemic.
@thesadtomato: But if you don't carry a sink with you everywhere you go then it's better then nothing.
No, they've just got shrunken heads in those boxes. The tissues ensure they don't crumble.
At least it doesn't have those terrible 'virus-killing' kleenex. I think they had a lot of citric acid in them. I tried one once and it irritated my nose a lot, which turned out to be a common complaint. Maybe they pulled them out of the market?
Also, if you're going to use Clorox or similar wipes to kill germs, read and follow the directions. Usually the surface you're cleaning has to stay damp for 10+ minutes, and you will likely have to pre-wash with soap & water. Follow the directions or you get no protection.
/end PSA
This is what is being advertised on television that you should have in your home, office, etc. At least they are not selling worthless "kits" like this one for $49.95 [www.campingsurvival.com]
@thesadtomato: @Fett101: Hand sanitizers work just fine, but with two caveats: 1) They have to contain at least 60% alcohol, otherwise they do almost nothing; and 2) They won't do any good if there's a substantial amount of stuff on your hands, since alcohol-based sanitizers can't cut through oils.
In any event, they're much better than nothing at all. They have their place, and they do help, even if they are not perfect.
@Vandelay Import Export: This a reverse of the treand to combine everything into one word like Superbowl or highschool. It's like every phrase has been converted into a URL.
@oneandone: I cringe whenever I see something marketed as "virus-killing". Viruses aren't alive, you can't kill them, but you can deactivate them. Kimberly-Clark, you make my head hurt!
@thesadtomato: @Ghede:
The camera on my blackberry flip does the same damn thing. Odd blur, weird fogs. My quicktake back in like 96 took better photos. I was beginning to think a ghost was following me around.
@Vandelay Import Export: @SenorDoucheoisie: Hand sanitizer cannot create superbugs... Antibacterial handsoap can though.
@Colonel Jack O'Neill: The media overhyped it earlier this year, true. And yes, in a lot of ways swine flu is the same as the seasonal flus that go around every year. The difference is that now we have two entirely different flu bugs going around, and for swine flu no one under the age of 60 has any immunity to it whatsoever.
As for your statement that "people die more from regular flu than swine flu" - I don't think there's any evidence of that at all, except in the elderly. And the elderly were exposed to the swine flu that went aorund in the 1960s, so they're largely immune (or so it appears right now). I mean, when the swine flu isn't making the rounds in the population, it's pretty hard for people to die from it.
People don't take the flu seriously, which is partly why so many people die from flu complications - they think "it's just the flu" and ignore just deal with it on their own. Maybe now that people are worried about swine flu they'll take any flu bug they get a bit more seriously. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing.
@Colonel Jack O'Neill: worster? as in WORSTED! AH-HA - The conspiracy reveals! So this flu is really from England and didn't originate in Mexico as previously reported?
Well, well...and they just wanted to be known for their sweet, sweet wool products.
I mean, sure this could be all tied up in the fact that H1N1 is infecting and actually fatal to more younger people than traditional flu is (much like that pesky 1918 flu) and as zoonotic influenzas go, this sucker is usually going through two species instead of one...but, hey, it's really this British connection we need to check!
You are a slick one - it's the 2nd revolution hidden in a silly story for sure!
@ElizabethD: Agreed, but the more people that freak out and maybe actually wash their hands, the less chance I have of getting it.
@ribex: Wrong!
He's a quarter head. Confusing, I understand, but one day your life may depend on knowing the difference.
Maybe the sign is a play on words "Head Quarters". I'm guessing that the store manager is not that clever.
@eirrom: This is at all stores, mandated by the corporate office. I definitely did some /facepalming when the word came down.
My wife just had it. She works at a hospital and they make you take the test if you come down with the flu. She missed several days of work, but yeah...it is basically the regular flu. I was pissed because I didn't get it, and would love to use some sick days, and say I had the swine flu.
@Ghede: The sensor doesn't capture the image instantaneously across the whole surface, it starts capturing (in this case probably) from the top on down. This picture isn't of a single moment in time, but is actually many different moments in short period of time, the top of the picture being older than the bottom, the top of the picture was probably taken while the camera was in motion, whereas by the lower part of the picture, the camera had stopped.
Thats my guess anyway.




























That's odd... I don't see the Tamiflu.