Flickr People Really Don't Like The New "From Yahoo!" Logo
You may have noticed that Flickr recently updated their logo to include "From Yahoo!" If you're at all familiar with Flickr, you can probably guess how well this is going over with the users.
Here is a thread about the logo with 630 (and growing) replies. A few highlights:
"I don't like it."
"yuck"
"Hate it."
"Hate it, as if we aren't reminded enough around here already that Yahoo pays the bills. :/ "
Further along in the thread people started to get creative:
Apparently someone has even written a greasemonkey script to get rid of the logo.
Guess Yahoo! needs to work on its branding...
flickr, now from yahoo! [Flickr]
(Photo:so tacky)
Post a comment
Comments:
@LMacConn: Because the flickr community is tight and they were there before yahoo bought out flickr. They are the reason flickr was worth buying in the first place. They were not happy about the corporate takeover and don't like to be reminded of that. I didn't think it was a big deal but I don't like the new logo and I greasemonkied it out of my sight.
I noticed it this morning and thought to myself, "Has that always been there?" and then went on about my business. I don't understand the problem.
It must be a very vocal minority complaining, because I'm very active on Flickr and haven't heard a peep from any of the people I'm in contact with there.
Good to know we've solved global warming, swine flu, health care and the economy so we can now turn our attention to pressing matters such as a logo.
This reminds me of the license plates here a couple of years ago. They featured a sun with a smiley face in the center of the plate (I honest to God never even looked at the plate long enough to notice) and this apparently enraged people so much that stores were actually selling stickers to place over the offending sun image. I didn't understand that one either.
@chucklebuck: It's far more likely that it's latent anger over some of the changes yahoo made to flickr after they acquired it. Those were a little more substantial, and have inspired years of repressed feelings ;)
@TheFlamingoKing: I highly doubt that the logo is "the only thing the users can complain about". Do you really think that is likely?
@redskull: Right, because until every other pressing global issue is solved, no one can complain about anything else. You didn’t get a raise? Tough, people are dying from H1N1!
@AstroPig7: So we can definitely put you down in the "I Don't Like The New Flickr From Yahoo" category then?
@chucklebuck: I mostly got annoyed when it kept insisting that I tie my Flickr account to my Yahoo account. It never occurs to Yahoo that I might not want every account I have on a website they own congealed into one big lump.
@redskull:
Thats not what he said. He may not even have a flickr account. He just pointed out that your statement was idiotic.
@Broadcaster: Is there a reason for this, or is this one of those things that just defies any logical explination?
@VA_White: Err, unless you created the greasemonkey script and publicized its use, you didn't fix a damn thing.
2nd point: it only fixes Firefox browsers, correct? So those others aren't fixed.
@johnrhoward: I'd like to be the first to welcome you to Consumerist*.
* I kid because I luv, fellow commentators. :D
@redskull: Life-challenged Americans, even vampires, deserve not to be harassed and discriminated against. I'd have hoped that, by now, we'd all agree on this point. You should be mortified and ashamed.
Those flea-bitten, roustabout, stinky-breathed Lycanthrope-Americans, on the other hand, deserve ALL the scorn they so justly earn.
This makes me want to shed a tear. I mean, the best thing about some corporations is their anonymity when they are behind some recognized products. Maybe they could start a trend. Kraft, by Phillip Morris.
BTW, the tear i want to shed is for the people who get upset when a free service they receive from a company does something benign like change a logo. Or does flicker charge now, i don't even remember.
@categorically: You know, I'd have hoped that your Father would have enough squirreled away on your behalf so relying on Social Security isn't needed. Especially after punking you with that whole crucifix thing.
Besides which, since you can multiply loaves of bread and change blood to wine, do you really need full SS benefits?
@Trai_Dep: I fixed it for myself. From my point of view, things are the way I like them. I only use firefox. Everyone else is on his or her own.
@skizsrodt: You can upload up to a certain amount free but most hard-core flickr users have unlimited pro accounts which do require an annual fee.
@Colonel Jack O'Neill: Well the Feds took away people's clove cigarettes..so maybe us hipsters are just a bit edgy today.
@GearheadGeek:
Jesus was ALWAYS a GEICO caveman....you just couldn't see it.
Also, you should fear for your social security because of the possibility that it will be unsustainable eventually.
Flickr, as a "brand," has a very positive image and makes me feel all warmfuzzy. Yahoo, as a brand, make me think of mediocre offerings, irritating advertising, and grabs for cash. I mean, I've been on the Net long enough to remember when Yahoo was new and cool, and then watch it lose its way over the years, its mission seeming to have entirely become, "How can we hook up a cash register to this Internet thing?" I don't want to be reminded of that when I go to Flickr. I would be much happier pretending Yahoo doesn't own it. I don't want the reminder.
@xtc46 - thinksmarter on twitter: And for those folks for whom Flickr is a paid service? What about them?
@bilge: Has Yahoo! fundementaly changed any of their services? As far as I can tell yuo still get
"Unlimited uploads and storage
Unlimited sets and collections
Access to your original files
Stats on your account
Ad-free browsing and sharing"
unless that has changed, there is no room to complain. but the VAST MAJORITY of flickr accounts are free.
@Jeff_McAwes0me: These are the same type of idiots that cry, "sellout" when their favorite indie band signs with a major label.
@Trai_Dep: Wow... Trai_Dep, that's low. There is absolutely no need to insult his religious beliefs.
@Jeff_McAwes0me: it's probably b/c everything yahoo touches turns to shit. some examples:
-rocketmail: best webmail client EVAR, then yahoo bought it & drowned it in a pool of suck.
-geocities: the world's first easy-to-use free webhosting for virtually anybody. yahoo bought it, adverted it beyond recognition & it's set to close next month.
-classicgames: one of the first free-to-play online gaming sites. yahoo bought it & added the one thing it was missing: annoying pop-ups at every click. YAY!
it's pretty much a given that when Y! ends up branding your site, it's not long before everything you've grown to love about the site disappears.




















But . . . it IS from Yahoo!
I just can't figure out how something so innocuous could bother so many people.