Southwest Jet Grounded Due To Horrific Burning Smell: Turns Out It Was Just The Coffee Maker
An early morning Southwest flight headed to Orlando from Connecticut only got as far as Long Island this weekend, after an inexplicable burning smell at the back of the plane forced an early landing. Turns out the unexplained smell was, well, something we're only too familiar with: airline coffee. The plane was quickly cleaned up and put back into operation. But let's call it a brewed awakening.
Flight grounded by coffee maker aroma [Reuters] (Thanks to EraserGirl!)
(Photo: dental ben)
Post a comment
Comments:
@G.O.B.: Come on!: You just had to ruin the joke by trying to explaint it, didnt you, you *|RUDE_WORD|*
Has anyone been able to substantiate if this was a terrorist act, has the TSA interviewed any of the airline staff to ensure that this was not intentional sabotage? I want to see a full investigation, after all, this is a serious issue that the TSA can get excited about. Perhaps as a result we can have hot liquids or coffee banned from flights along with the list of personal hygiene products.
@Smashville: Wait...I have more...
Time for someone to spill the beans about how this happened...it will probably take a while for information to filter out.
@DreamTheEndless: Back during the bad-old days of regulated airlines, Braniff used coffee they imported themselves from columbia. My mother, who worked for Braniff I and II said it was some of the best she'd ever had and always looked forward to flying just to get some.
My how things change.
@AppleAlex: I remember flying on KLM a long time ago and all their planes smelled of really good quality coffee.
@Smashville: You sound bitter about the whole thing. You better Yirgacheffe yourself before you wreck yourself.
@Applyin'Sunscreen_GitEmSteveDave:
You sure you didn't accidentally go to Starbucks? I've never had burnt-tasting DD coffee.
@tbax929: I wouldn't say it if it didn't happen nearly EVERY time I go there, no matter the location. And I drink coffee from lots of other places, and rarely catch that. IIRC, I've never partaken of SB.
@Applyin'Sunscreen_GitEmSteveDave: This is blasphemy, bordering on defamation, and I'm considering getting Roz in here. For shame.
@AppleAlex: The main problem is air pressure at altitude does not allow for efficient brewing. I've found the DD coffee on JetBlue to be slightly better than other airlines, but still not as good as coffee on the ground.
@AppleAlex: Continental's coffee is horrendous, yet somehow I forget that fact once I board one of their flights.
@darabidduckie: I'm trying to figure out why they used "aroma" as a tag. I generally use "aroma" when describing a pleasant smell. As this ended up being burnt coffee, there's no way it was a pleasant aroma.
@nycaviation: 8000 feet isn't good enough? What? That's the altitude planes are generally pressurized to, and I've been to plenty of places above even 9000 feet (in the cold) that had darn good coffee.
It has nothing to do with that and everything to do with bad water.
@undefined:
". "
Huh? Airlines use extraction brewing... pressure comes into play in an espresso-type machine, which is "pressurized" to the equivilant of being well under sea level.
However, the low air pressure does make everything bland, and can make coffee taste dull..
United experimented with Starbucks, but pulled it when even that coffee sucked.
The good coffee out there is jetBlue's on the E190s, Southwest's new Lift blend, and ours.
The reason? jetBlue uses bottled water on the e190s, instead of the "gray" water on the A320s. Southwest is passing all water for their new coffee offering through a filter custom-designed by Pur. We start flights with bottled water, but if it runs low, we have an off the shelf (from Target, specifically) Brita pitcher ready to go.
@SkokieGuy: Fun fact: Starbucks intentionally over roasts (burns) their coffee. Since they originally roasted everything on the west coast, and coffee degrades rapidly, they found that burning the hell out of it in the first place is the only way to ensure a consistent product nationwide.
Their coffee isn't famous for being great, but it is known for being predictable and consistent.
McDonalds, on the other hand, uses Green Mountain and other beans that are roasted much closer = their coffee is usually better, but not as consistent.




















Does Starbucks handle the Southwest beverage service now?