Anonymous Comments And Facebook Connect Deactivated
We're disabling anonymous comments and Facebook Connect.
99% of the anons were unpublishable. Those that were, our moderator found herself approving the same people over and over again. Facebook Connecters could get in without auditioning, with inevitable results. It's also not fair to make some people try hard to audition while other people get a free pass because they have a sexy API. Going forward, if you want to comment on Consumerist, you must register for an account.
Whether you're registering for the first time or a current commenter, you should also take this opportunity to add a valid email address to your profile for password recovery. When we leave Gawker's and go on to our own platform later this year, you'll only be able to keep your commenter name, profile, and history if you're able to respond to a re-registration email that we will have to send out. Go to "Profile" -> "edit my profile" to add yours.
I'm sure disabling anon and Facebook Connect will piss off and thrill in equal measure, but I think in the end that raising the bar for entry will improve the quality of the conversation inside.
(Photo: joguldi)
Post a comment
Comments:
@bitslammer: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! <runs screaming through the window at the end of the hall>
@SnatchTease: I believe at one point it was mentioned that Gawker support would continue for a year as part of the deal.
@bitslammer: It wouldn't go over well with the MySpace crowd since you can't add Blingee to comments.
This seems fair enough but Ben and everybody else, I BEG you not to switch over to Gawker's current commenting system that is degrading to its users. Greying out the text of non-starred commenters and not even showing them unless you click a button. It creates a large divide between the user base and so far I'm glad Consumerist is user friendly enough to not have done that.
@SnatchTease: The Consumerist has an agreement with Gawker to stay on their network for a year IIRC. When that year's up, then they'll be moving to their own platform.
Just hoping the comment system stays similar to how it is now, and not like the new Gawker comments.
@SnatchTease: Part of the deal was that Gawker would let them keep the system for one year after the sale.
As long as Consumerist doesn't switch over to that godawful voting system they have on Gawker sites now, I think I'll be fine.
@squinko: I thought the same.
I mean, it's not as if I don't use facebook as well, but it's just odd to me the caliber of comments coming from there.
No post auditioning is it, i suppose.
@kyle4: Seconded. My commenting on other Gawker sites has gone down considerably due to the new commenting system...
...which probably means Consumerist will now move to quickly adopt the new system ;-)
Former Facebooker here (Jim Topoleski) Surprise Surprise to everyone who used to make snide comments about me being a facebooker, since guess what I HAD a real account long before Facebook was added!
But to get to the point of my post, I highly doubt it. Just take a look at the number of long time Gawker posters here or there who post utter crap.
Hell half the Facebook complainers where some of the WORST posters on the blog, and they got a free pass to complain about facebook posters!
All this really did was cut off a group of people who are now going to enmass flood your site with requests, get on, MAYBE make a few legit comments, then fuck around like before.
If you really want to ACTUALLY improve contents.
1) Drop the snide comments in the blog posts. The more you treat it like a NEWS site, the more likely people will be adult.
2) ACTIVELY moderate. If it means you need to pay someone to watch over who posts, then do it. Passive moderation NEVER works in the long run.
That being said, I think I am done here. While I was excited for the blog to be split away from Gawker, being under the CR banner worried me. I see since that time my worries where properly placed.
All I have come to see is instead of being a consumer site for all, there has been a constant and steady push toward making it exactly what I hate about CR it's self, a repository where you have to pay to get what should be freely given information.
I give it another 6 months to a year before you have to pay or be a subscriber before you are even allowed to comment here. Its too bad this was a good site when Gawker owned you.
@squinko: Yeah, it has /some/ good points, but overall it is quite awful. a net negative. by a long distance.
@juri squared: I dont think Facebookers were nearly as bad as the anons that Roz had to weed out. Thankfully we never got to see those :D
Well, having been a purely Facebook commenter, I think its a good thing that people need to audition. I don't know if this account has been approved or not, yet, but I've been posting on here for months now. In fact, two of my stories made the front page. Maybe that will count fer sumpthin'. Guess I'll see when I click "submit."
*crosses fingers*
@nucwin83: "readers" technically.
And regular consumerists cant be that bad, but I can only imagine what rest of the unapproved comments were like.
@Falcon5768: Sorry, I don't think you're Jim. He had a Facebook account he would post with, but also a regular account that was his full name.
@squinko: I have stopped reading the Gawker sites since they are filled with all sorts of script errors with their new system.
@★_red3001: Actually GitEmSteveDave and Kaiser Machead and OMG Ponies! stopped caring a while ago about facebookers. Once they got used to the decreased quality of stuff :P





























"We're disabling ... Facebook Connect."
Best news I've heard all day.