Nearly all "Eco" Product Claims Are Misleading
Mother Jones reports that a study of "4,000 'eco-friendly' consumer products... found that 98 percent make false or misleading claims." Hardly a surprise, huh?
The study, presented to Congress earlier this month by the environmental consulting firm TerraChoice, found rampant greenwashing in every product category.
Congress is now considering how to curb the problem.
"Study: 98 Percent of "Eco-Friendly" Products Make Misleading Claims" [Mother Jones] (Thanks, Jennifer Hughes!)
[Photo: Shira Golding]
Carrie McLaren & Jason Torchinsky are coeditors of Ad Nauseam: A Survivor's Guide to American Consumer Culture. In previous lives, they worked together on the hopelessly obscure and now defunct Stay Free! magazine.
Post a comment
Comments:
@torgonius: to some, environmentalism IS a religion...I think they call them zealots *cough*Greenpeace*cough*
@zentex: If you really think that Greenpeace are zealots then you know nothing of radical environmentalism.
@SarcasticDwarf: Moreso I think companies realize that making some claim about how they are helping the environment makes them look good to consumers, at the same time how many consumers will actually do any research to verify said claim? Very few.
It's about perception, NOT reality, just like most other forms of marketing.
@I Love New Jersey: Shhhhh about the carbon credits, I've been writing "carbon credit" on monopoly money and selling them outside Earthfares, apple stores, Whole Foods grocery stores and other places where green sorts gather.
This isn't surprising... it is sad however, since it gives fodder to people like those above bashing the Climate Change situation. These same people refuse to see evolution as factual as well.... sorry people the best evidence out there is that both are real... until you provide credible, provable evidence otherwise- these are going to remain the prevailing scientific theories and hypothesis.
As someone posted above, whether it's religion or a major movement, people are susceptible to being manipulated because they think they're doing right. How does the saying go...? "The road to hell is paved with good intentions..."
@rellog321: I believe Hemingway said it in the most appropriate way for The Consumerist:
"The road to hell is paved with unbought stuffed dogs."
@B1663R: There are at least legal requirements for the use of that label--not the most stringent, admittedly, but they're there. But there's no law against Phillips Petroleum running ads that suggest they're the leader in environmentalism and won't we please get on their green bandwagon.
@torgonius: I always thought the most striking similarity between environmentalism and religion is the "carbon offsets" gimmick that allows the wealthy to live as non-green as they want.
Carbon offsets are a copy of the "indulgences" sold by parts of the Christian church in the middle ages that allowed the wealthy to sin all they wanted and still get the express lane to heaven. Scams all around.
@AllToAll,ByMyMustard!_GitEmSteveDave: Why does nobody seem to remember that? what was it that was causing the cooling back then? that part I can't remember.
@B1663R: It used to be that the word "Organic" on food labeling was a free-for-all and there were no regulations. But just a few years ago the FDA created strict guidelines for those claming a food is organic.
While there have been a couple of cases of mix ups (e.g. a non-organic ingredient going into a product that is supposed to be organic) for the most part the regulations seem to be working.
But just a few years ago before the law began any food company could say "organic" on any food at all.
@AllToAll,ByMyMustard!_GitEmSteveDave:
Global Cooling awareness... I think it's insane that so many people don't remember that we were all supposed to freeze to death!
I'll invest with ya, we'll make millions from 2021 thru 2043 by selling obnoxiously dull looking winter jackets & igloo snow-brick building kits.
@I Love New Jersey: How about the fact that electric cars require...electricity. Electricity that is created largely by burning COAL- one of the worst pollutants (and a unsustainable practice besides).
@I Love New Jersey: Canadian strip mining*
Actually...it's much more efficient to get electricity from 1 huge power plant vs. a million tiny ones. You know all that heat your car produces? It's only 10% efficient... in a coal plant, the heat is reused = 55% efficiency, after taking power line waste into account.
@WorldHarmony: You can, of course, generate power other ways. Over 80% of France's electricity is nuclear, for instance.





















Just like all religions, Environmentalism gets used and abused by people who will twist the message for their own personal or corporate gain.
Now, send me $5 and I'll plant a tree.