Really. Shocking.

Hey, the only x-ray specs that work are my x-ray specs. Yeesh!

I'm sure it's possible, but they'll cost more than $14.99, and you won't get them from an offer on the back of a magazine.

Well, at least I still have that batch of Sea-Monkies on order.

@MooseOfReason: radiation much? ever wonder why they make you put that lead apron on at the dentist, or why the tech goes to the other room or something? its a small amount of radiation, but enough (especially near the eyes) cant be a good thing.

@☠Grяrяrяrяrя sings the doom song now!: dude i got a sea monkeys thing and they lived for like a month. it was pretty cool

Ha! I could see right through that scam.

@☠Grяrяrяrяrя sings the doom song now!: i saved up once for the sea monkies when i was a kid. and then when they arrived my mom took a look and marched me across the street to look at the neighbors' salt water fish tank and the brine shrimp they put in for the angelfish to eat.
bitter introduction to reality, but i did learn to be a wise little consumer and investigate the product thoroughly before purchase

@catastrophegirl - brand new homeowner: Yeah, sure, but did your neighbors brine shrimp come with party hats and a bugle? I think NOT!

@Synth3t1c: Makes me wonder if Superman's pal, Jimmy Olsen, has been rendered infertile.

Knowing as many horny Korean males of a certain ilk as I do, I really feel sympathy for any women who were "field tested" after the customers tried out their new spectacles.

@Trai_Dep: I feel so... Used. And dirty.

@Trai_Dep:

Errr, why? They didn't work. It wasn't 'x-ray gloves' they were testing.

@dwb:

Zing!

@henwy:

Yeah, but as we all know from performing our own tests with X-ray specs, you need to first view the women naked in order to determine if any naked parts you see through the goggles are genuine.