If Legislation Passes, The FDA May Soon Regulate Cigarettes
The New York Times is reporting that Richard M. Burr, the "tobacco-state senator who tried a filibuster this week against a bill that would allow the Food and Drug Administration to regulate the cigarette industry" has apparently given up, clearing the way for the bill to pass the Senate. A similar bill has already passed the House and Obama says he will sign the legislation.
What will it mean to have the FDA regulate tobacco?
The legislation, known as the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, would for the first time empower the Food and Drug Administration to measure and restrict the harmful chemical components in tobacco and cigarette smoke. It would also require the agency to review new tobacco products; ban the use of terms like "light" and "low tar" that might misleadingly suggest those products were safer; require new, larger health warnings on cigarette packages; and tighten restrictions on marketing and advertising.
Phillip Morris is in favor of the legislation, which it helped write, because (according to critics) the additional bureaucracy would help it retain and/or grow its already considerable market share.
Tobacco Regulation Bill Is Expected to Pass Senate [NYT]
Defending Big Tobacco is a lonely fight these days [AP]
(Photo:The Joy Of The Mundane)
PREVIOUSLY: After Decade-Long Delay, House Tells FDA To Regulate Tobacco
Post a comment
Comments:
I think they should be able to control misleading advertising and restrict the most dangerous chemicals, but should not be allowed to ban. We should still have the right to kill ourselves slowly through stupid behaviour. My preferred way is food. Of course, if national healthcare passes, I say that smokers pay a big additional premium for that right.
@White Speed Receiver: And pipes! I just started smoking a pipe once a month or so, and happen to be enjoying it :)
@Bearded Rapper: It certainly wouldn't be the first time.
Thousands of self-employed businessmen, artists, and boutique owners who make or deal in hand-crafted children's toys, clothes, or furniture could be out of work [in February]. A 2008 federal law, with the salutary-sounding name "Consumer Products Safety Improvement Act," could drive these craftsmen out of business.
Big toymakers, who helped write the bill, are ready for the regulations that will go into effect Feb. 10, while smaller toymakers look likely to suffer.
It's virtually impossible to be an entrepreneur in industries "run" by large corporations in this country thanks to their influence in the government. Antitrust? What a joke.
Think I'm wrong? Try to start up a telco. It's like trying to uproot a mature Sycamore with a Grabber Reacher.
@GuinevereRucker: I was walking down the street and someone was just walking along, happy as can be, smoking a pipe! A pipe! I was pretty amused.
@umbriago: Maybe they can stock the cigarettes next to the dramamine and barf bags. I bet the drug companies would love that.
@cmkennedy:
Is that like cigarette buying roulette? 1 times out of 10 you will end up with a pack of "filter only" cigarettes? That's kind of... awesome.
@cmkennedy: That's hilarious. But in a way it's sort of like buying a hard drive that turns out to be a brick.
Welcome to the world of Big Tobacco. They've lobbied for years to prevent FDA regulation. With Congress and the White House controlled by Democrats, it was only a matter of time.
@Riff-Raff: on the bright side be happy you are/were off. I need some time off myself but have not fully done it yet.
I just quit smoking last monday. Why did I quit? Because here in Nebraska 1 pack of Marlboro's is running $5.50. I think all they need to do to prevent smoking and get people to quit is to raise taxes on em some more. 10 bucks a pack would do it for sure. I'd be ecstatic knowing that I was "saving" $70 a week.
@speeddaimon: Hey, it's the only reason my father quit while he was on active duty in the Navy. He couldn't afford his habit anymore, so he quit.
Taxes are akin to prohibition - they disincent you from starting/continuing but set up a rich environment for the black market to thrive. And we saw how well that worked in the 1920s. Regulation is best even though the organization tasked with said regulation is not that great at it.
If they can't find a source for E. Coli on some damn hot peppers, how on Earth can they prevent millions of children from smoking and getting millions more to quit?!?
@Riff-Raff: With the price of a pack hitting +$6 here in Dallas, I'm pretty much already there...it's just insane...
@umbriago:
They put those on the front of Canadian cigarette boxes. They take up almost half of the front of the box.
Fun stuff.
@GuinevereRucker: Why? It's pretty ridiculous that a non-addictive plant that you CANNOT O.D. from and that can grow literally anywhere is illegal.
@Erwos: Both yes and no, there is no law that says you can't purchase them, but I believe there is one about them getting shipped to the US.
@HIV 2 Elway: Government regulation is not a black and white issue. There are good and bad sides. Obviously this is one of the bad sides, and laws should be passed that minimize the influence of lobbyists. That's what this is, by the way, very little to do with an overreaching government.
I've said it before and I've said it again. When you elect people on the foundation that they believe government can't do anything right, you get a government that can't do anything right. That's what we dealt with for 8 years - someone who didn't believe in government, installing his horse training buddy as the head of fucking FEMA. It's going to take a while to undo that shit.
@cmkennedy: It's good that it worked for you, but I think you might be a special case. They're about $10 in NY, and every time I go I still see broke-ass people smoking cigarettes every day.
@pecan 3.14159265: I admit, it feels very cultured to smoke a pipe. I kinda feel like Mr. Holmes or Tolkien or Lewis or some cultured English guy. And it's not addictive since I do it so seldom.
@Micromegas: Ya because the war on drugs has worked so well. /sarcasm.
So you don't mind if the drug cartels get a new business then?
@ARP: I almost agree completely with you. You do have the right to kill yourselves slowly through stupid behavior. But the problem is that your stupid behavior hurts other people at the same time. I watched as cigarettes killed my father. That was his choice, but I am the one who has health problems from being around the smoke because of it even 8 years after his death.
@CharlieInSeattle: The so called 'War on drugs' is a total crock. If the government really wanted to put an end to illegal drugs, it could do so within 30 days. The thing is, they don't want to. They are making so much money off of the drug trade. All of these drug dealers who are making all of this money. What are they doing with it? Stuffing it in the mattress? No. They are spending it. And in doing so, they are having to pay taxes on the things they are buying: homes, cars, boats, etc...
The government is the big winner in the drug trade.
@nakedscience: I was just telling my husband last night that I wish pot was legal - my liver needs a break.
Or I need yoga and a 12 step. It's all in the perspective, I guess.
@takes_so_little: I cam here to type this too. I am not only surprised, but actually a little frightened that the FDA has not been regulating cigarettes.
@youbastid: "When you elect people on the foundation that they believe government can't do anything right, you get a government that can't do anything right."
You're seriously insinuating that electing politicians who believe government is just fine will produce government that runs just fine?
Hot damn, I'll smoke what he's smoking.
@P_Smith: But you gotta ask yourself...who's padding Teddy's pockets more?
I'm ashamed to share a surname with that group.

















So Phillip Morris likes this law so it pushes out the smaller companies in this business? Interesting strategy, and one that may screw up their business in the long run.