Don't Pay For Directory Assistance
Amidst the chatter about the iPhone 3G S and iPhone cultists' users' hate/hate relationship with AT&T, here's another bit of bad news for AT&T subscribers: reader Mark e-mailed to let us know that the cost of directory assistance calls will go up to $1.99 on July 1. Fortunately, when you need 411 service, you don't have to pay for it.
Free directory assistance is available from both Google and Microsoft (under the Bing brand):
1-800-GOOG-411
1-800-BING-411 (also 1-800-CALL-411)
1-800-FREE-411 (requires listening to a short ad)
If your phone has access to the Interweb, 411 is pretty pointless, but it's nice to know that it's there when you lack a data connection or are stuck with something less than a smartphone.
PREVIOUSLY:
3 Ways To Call 411 For Free
(Photo: cogdog)
Post a comment
Comments:
I hadn't actually realized until a couple years ago that 411 was a paid service. I've since used GOOG-411 several times and was impressed that the entire process was handled without operator intervention. Quick and easy. But it raises the question - who administrates 411, exactly, and why are they under the impression that paying $1.99 for the service is worthwhile when the free options are arguably equal or better?
@youbastid:
The cost of directory assistance specifically is not normally addressed in an AT&T wireless contract.
@Nick1693: That video was painful to watch. Some comparisons are similar, I admit, but... I think Apple was digging through straws too much to draw those conclusions.
@Carso:
I believe 411 is provided by your phone service provider, if that's what you're asking, although I've read that it's typically outsourced, with the carrier keeping over 50% of the charges.
@Gramin:
411 is great when you're not near a computer and you don't pay $30 a month for mobile internet.
That's really interesting.
I know a couple million iPhone 3G who would love to upgrade to the 3GS without an ETF or or forking over the entire unsubsidized price.
Consumerist has posted a handful of guides to
escaping an ETF based on fee changes.
@chris_d: If that's the case, I'd be tempted to believe that the vast majority of it is outsourced. It's hard to imagine that AT&T would be willing to deal with the HR costs associated with maintaining a 411 call center in the US. Thanks for the info.
@morlo:
No, it doesn't. My comment suggests that I don't think the Consumerist should be insulting their readers.
@thbarnes: I would argue if you use 411 regularly, the increase could be considered a materially adverse change, but I don't like your chances of getting AT&T to buy that.
Most wireless carriers will try anything they can think of to prevent you from weaseling out of a contract due to something like this.
@Cant_stop_the_rock: I agree. I'm sick of this whole Apple users are cultists" BS. The iPhone is a great device, that's it.
Only problem I have with 1 800 FREE 411 is that it's often not accurate, or they don't have the latest information of a location.
There have been many times where I will say "Joplin, MO" and then something like "Wal Mart" and it'll say some completely random place that is not even remotely near wal mart.
I do, however, appreciate that they will send you a text message when you finally get the right number.
Oh, and texting GOOGL because it's often faster and more accurate than anything else I deal with.
@FatLynn: I absolutely LOVE Google's SMS service.
It'll also define words, and translate phrases.
You really don't need to pay for much of anything when it comes to information services, between Google and Cha-Cha. That pretty much wipes out 411 and KGB entirely.
@youbastid: You know, I tried reading Consumerist comments today after a month-long irritation-sparked hiatus, but yours has just put me on the wagon again.
What is it about this site that attracts such sanctimonious assholes?
@FatLynn: i've always used 466453 to text GOOGLE. and i have also used it for directions [but i have unlimited text messaging - directions have run anywhere from 2-6 text messages back from google for the different steps]
@Carso:
Not sure if they outsource it or not, but the amount of time you're talking to a real person is very short - probably under 15 seconds.
One of my former managers worked as a directory assistance operator at AT&T before it was computerized. They were very big on efficiency back then, so I imagine it's even more like a sweatshop now. He had to look everything up in actual phone books back then.
@t0ph: It was a joke. At about 4:39, they said "..and yet, these days all they seem to be able to do is copy Google and Apple."
@Cant_stop_the_rock: Still, all of the $1.99 call centers have real people, wheras the free ones are computers. A real person is extremely helpful if you need to spell out "Schlitterbahn" or to find your local Starucks, not the other 58 in the city.
@clementine: Amen to that! Its sad how underused libraries are. Libraries will have all of the phone books, city directories, etc. Please call your local librarian, they would love to answer questions besides "where's the bathroom" and "how do I print from this computer?" (Can you tell I just graduated from library school? lol)
@Nick1693: MS was just introducing Tell Me (who they acquired) on a wider scale, and Tell Me had their service out before Google 411.
So it is more proper to say Microsoft start your mint.
@morganlh85: Blackbberries will let you type the letters in and it automatically converts them into numbers for you
microsoft has managed to make yet another interface cluttered and inefficient. upon calling, you have to listen to a message telling you what Bing 411 is (most users probably know what 411 is, because they dialed it.) then, the service asks to send you a text message about Bing 411. Again, we know what 411 is.
On the other hand, Google's service starts out with a quick message: 'Say the business and the city and state'. quick, painless, and it gets you to your information faster. seems to be what google succeeds at in all their services.
Blogger Lesson 101..
In order to generate more page views for your blog, use one or more of the following keywords in your blog entry headlines:
ipod
iphone
Apple
Steve Jobs
Microsoft
Vista
bacon
beer
bacon beer
ponies
In other words, Laura wasn't insulting you. Get over it.
@Xanaxian: I don't see how a legit question on a possible breach of contract makes him a hypocritical asshole.
If he decided to drop AT&T as a carrier before his contract ended, he would be pegged with a heafty fee. His punishment for not honoring the prior agreement. However, if Apple promised free 411 service at the time of signing, and they dropped that and it was important to someone (which I doubt), it's still breach of contract.
Take your pretentious (see I can use big words too) attitude elsewhere please.
@Cant_stop_the_rock: It's not called "The iPhone-Owner Consumerist." Then again, Consumerist can pretty much abuse their readers however they want, you can go elsewhere.
Plus, "cultist" might not be all bad. It implies a tremendous sense of community and real commitment to a cause. Take it as a compliment.
Also, some light reading, context is half the battle, or some such: [consumerist.com]
[consumerist.com]





















411? What's that? They still have that service. It's so 1990's.