Watch Out For Foreign Transaction Fees When Booking With Foreign Carriers
Cliff logged on to his U.S. internet connection to use his U.S. credit card to buy airline tickets on Aer Lingus in U.S. dollars, a transaction he assumed wouldn't incur a foreign transaction fee. Nope! Citibank slapped a 3% fee on the $2,600 purchase, something Cliff feels the airline should have warned him about.
One would think that when you book a flight with an international airline from a US IP address and pay in dollars, they would execute the credit card transaction in the US. However, that is not necessarily the case. I charged four tickets on Aer Lingus to my Citibank credit card for a total of around $2600 and just saw on my statement that Citibank charged a 3 percent foreign transaction fee on that entire amount—even though I booked from the US on aerlingus.com and paid in dollars. Those still traveling in this economy should seriously consider booking through one of the online travel agencies instead directly with a foreign airline to avoid this unexpected charge.
Call Citibank and tell them you don't want to pay a foreign transaction fee for an ostensibly domestic purchase. As a courtesy, they should be able to waive the fee.
(Photo: infomatique)
Post a comment
Comments:
Why would it be a foreign company's responsibility to inform you of a charge your domestic bank is going to charge? How would they even know? Why would you expect a foreign company to be able to conduct their business whereever a person who accesses their site is from, rather than where they actually are?
Foreign transaction fees are BS. It's not like there was a currency conversion. Citibank shouldn't be charging this nonsense. Didn't the CC companies stop doing this for a while?
I have a Citibank Business Visa and when I travel my company insists everything possible is put on it. They, too, charge the 3%. Sometimes hotels and other merchants can bill you in USD, and you still will get the foreign transaction fee.
It makes expense reporting a bitch.
Change banks or cards if you don't like their terms.
@lotussix: Apparently because where the airline does the processing determines whether the OP gets the fee. If they're doing the transaction in dollars on a US IP, the OP is right to assume it's a domestic transaction unless informed otherwise.
@ShyamasriPera2: The settlement was because the CC companies were rolling the fee in with the purchase and not breaking it out separately, which was deceptive.
Now they usually show it as a separate line item (FOREIGN TRANSACTION FEE), which is ostensibly less deceptive but just as annoying.
When I saw the notice from BoA last week, I thought that they had reached a new low: they decide that they can charge you a foreign transaction fee (and a hefty one at that) for something that isn't a foreign transaction. I guess instead of a new low, it's the new standard.
It's bad enough paying the transaction fees on actual other-currency purchases. I sure as heck won't be paying a CC issuer a 3% surcharge on something that I buy from Lufthansa or BA in US$. (After the disaster that was booking through an online travel service, I always book directly with the airline.) I wonder if letters to the airlines would have any effect.
I swear, as soon as I finish buying a house, I'm going to shop around on credit cards, FICO be damned.
At the beginning of this year I renewed my subscription to an academic journal using my Citibank card. The journal is published in and mailed from the US. The renewal notice was sent from an American address. I sent it back to that American address (using only a 42 cent stamp!) authorizing the company to bill me in US dollars for my renewal. When I got my bill from Citibank several weeks later, I saw that they had charged the three per cent foreign transaction fee because the parent company in the UK is the company that processes all of the billing. I actually had to escalate to a supervisor to get the three per cent waved (it was less than 2 dollars), and the supervisor told me that she was doing this once as a courtesy and wouldn't be doing it again in the future.
Next year, I"m sending the publisher a check instead.
Discover doesn't charge a foreign transaction fee, even when dealing with foreign currency. The price I see is the price I pay. Of course, this limits your usage patterns a little, but if your travel is mostly to China Discover is a boon (it's treated as a domestic bank card would so the only places that don't take Discover don't take any other cards either).
If anyone wants a credit card that doesn't charge foreign transaction fees, I've found that the Schwab Bank Invest First Visa is pretty decent. I just used it in Rome and London with no problems at all.
Capital One doesn't charge foreign transaction fees either but they don't seem to have the best customer service.
[www.flyerguide.com]
@Eyebrows McGee (on Twitter: LPetelle): The fee is up to the individual credit card issuer. Most cards have a 3% fee, some do not though. Aer Lingus's website doesn't have a US-based IP address; the purchaser did.
Airline? How can the airline possibly know what fees your credit card will charge?
The airline is in Ireland where else would they charge the ticket. To avoid the fee use a travel agent in the US, or choose a card that does not charge three percent for non US charges. That is an absurd charge. One percent is even a bit much if you ask me.
I've hard it charged on a $14.95/month subscription fee to EVE Online, the developer of which (CCP) is based in Iceland - even though the payment is in dollars. It only came out to a buck or two but it was still pretty annoying. Only reason why I'm on this card right now is because I'm a college student and I need to build my credit score first - once I can get a decent card with a decent limit elsewhere that's what I'm doing.
@s25843: I got that too. The Mastercard added the Foreign Transaction fee, but the BofA Amex didn't.
The banks basically redefines "foreign transaction fees" as either a charge that they have to convert from foreign currency or a charge posted by a non-US based processor regardless of the currency. Therefore, if you purchase something from a Texas company that charges you in Rupe, you will also get a foreign transaction fee.
Changing bank may not be a solution as they are such a cartel that when one start doing it, everyone will follow some day. It is called modelling. You would think that this should be regulated but no, because we are a free country. Unless you can somehow convince our government that this is robbery.
@lotussix: It's a pretty relevant piece of information! A note saying that you *may* incur a foreign transaction fee is all they'd have to state.
@haoshufu: Well the free enterprise system hasn't failed us yet. There are at least two credit card companies that don't charge any foreign transaction fees. Schwab Bank and Capital One. There are also debit cards that don't charge any fees.
When I travel abroad, I put away my AMEX and Citi cards and only use my Schwab card. I actually save money because they also give me 2% cash back. Pretty happy with it.
@JoshRogan: Capital One is a good card to use abroad because they don't charge a fee and eat the 3% Visa fee too.
Visa charges a 3% fee. Most credit card companies charge another fee on top of that.
@jamar0303: Yeah, problem with Discover is it's rarely accepted in Europe. Capital One beats it for that.
I just got a letter from B of A (I have a VISA from them) that was very interesting. It said that from now on they'd charge me a 3 or 4 percent foreign transaction fee for every purchase EITHER (A) in a foreign currency or (B) where the purchase takes place outside the US, EVEN IF the purchase was denominated in US Dollars.
Case A is understandable. B is retarded. One more reason to keep that card sock-drawered except an annual pack of gum.
Also, here's a card besides Capital One (whom I got pretty tired of dealing with) that doesn't charge any foreign transaction fees:
@pallendo: Believe it.
[wwwa.managerewardsonline.bankofamerica.com]
When they couldn't lower my interest rate any lower, they offered me the Amex with the same credit line.
I bought a vacuum from Dyson.com and WAMU/Chase tried to charge me a "foreign transaction fee" because Dyson is based out of England. I told them that dyson.com is based out of Illinois and the entire transaction was in US dollars. After calling WAMU/Chase they finally refunded the fee, but not after a long hassle
I also noticed that my monthly Skype subscription was getting dinged with this fee. I called to complain about this and after a few minutes of me asking how they could justify this, she told me to read the Patriot Act and that there was a lot of red tape involved in transfers to foreign entities. As a small business owner with foreign transactions, I don't believe it.
@Blinky987: I was thinking the exact same thing. When I'm in Europe, the more "in the know" hotels will do the conversion to Can$ and charge that on my Canadian credit card and I'm yet to see any "foreign transaction" service charge. (The hotel doesn't lose anything in the deal so the larger once were happy to do it.)
I'm wondering if the US$ quoted on the Aer Lingus site was really Irish Pounds (Euros?) in the background and translated on-the-fly for the OP's screen. If this is the case, shame on Aer Lingus for not making it clear on the page.
A website ending in '.com' doesn't automatically mean it's an American commerce site. .com was SUPPOSED to refer to that way back when the spec was written up, but it hasn't been like that since before AOL was a new puppy.
I'd say its the OP's fault for not paying attention. He seemed to know Aer Lingus was an international outfit, so should not be surprised at the foreign fee from the CC company.
OP here. Glad to see this post generated so much interest. In response to a few of the comments, though: From all information on the airline's website, the fare was quoted and paid-for in dollars. The address of the website was .com, not .ie. It is perfectly reasonable to expect that an international airline that does a major portion of its business with US residents would use a US-based credit card processor for their transactions. If it is not going to do this, than it is also reasonable for it to realize that this *might* generate unexpected foreign transaction fees, and to disclose the location of the credit processor. It's not a matter of either the airline or the consumer being unaware of the credit card's terms...it's a matter of the airline disclosing information it could reasonably expect to be significant to the consumer.
@nwaasob: Visa is the source of the fee. Your bank just passes that on to you. Capital One and the other cards without the fee just eat the fee and pay it so you don't have to.
I've used my BA card frequently in Canada and Mexico, and while they do tack on a bit of a surcharge, I've never seen it hit 3%, something I guess i'll need to keep an eye on. Usually though I raid a foreign ATM and carry local currency, much cheaper then currency exchange, and if the exchange rate is good, the service fees are more then offset.
http://www.whois.net/whois/aerlingus.com
The website and server for Aer Lingus are clearly based in the UK based on aerlingus.com and the domain registration information linked above. It's important to note that a .COM address only denotes that the website is commercial in nature and has no relation to its country of origin. Aer Lingus has no business processing its credit card transactions in the USA and there's absolutely no reason to expect that foreign companies should begin to do so.
The foreign transaction in US Dollars can burn you even more - the company often gives you a bad exchange rate when they convert to US Dollars and then you get hit with the credit card fee.
I saw warnings about hotels converting to US Dollars "as a convenience" to the guest over ten years ago. Many hotels took a 5 to 10% profit on the exchange. If the guest questioned it, they would point to the sign displaying the hotel's exchange rate.











I received a letter from Citibank a couple of weeks ago stating that they are changing their policy on foreign transaction. Now even a US$ transaction will be charged a 3% fee if it is charged by a foreign entity. Prior to this change, only non-US$ transactions were considered "foreign".
I guess just another way for banks to make money.