Barnes & Noble Shelves "Diary of Anne Frank," "Guiness Book of World Records" Under Fiction
When reader Lynn asked an employee at the Tyson's Corner Barnes & Noble in McLean, VA why the Diary of Anne Frank and the Guiness Book of World Records were shelved under fiction, he jokingly responded: "Some Albanian probably put it there." Good one, Barnes & Noble!!! Full picture, inside.

Post a comment
Comments:
@Donathius: But, of course, if you acknowledge that, you take fire out of the holocaust denial argument. Obviously it was a simple shelving error, hence the two other clearly non-fiction books shelved under fiction. Hopefully people can temper their self-righteousness and gently point out the error, along with the other two books instead of getting up in arms.
Funny response though, as long as the error was promptly fixed.
@HiPwr: Extreme anti-Christian/atheist or whatnot perhaps, but I'm curious, how does that make one an idiot?
@TheDayIsMine: Extreme anti-Christian/atheist/Jesusfreak/etc. or not, you have to admit pulling that kind of stuff is annoying to the store workers, to say the least.
Obnoxious and childish at the worst.
@BustangBetty: I wonder if your friend does that with the Koran, too. It's not as fashionable to be hateful towards and strive to piss off Muslims, is it?
What's to be gained by this behavior? I say that anyone that goes out of their way to anger people who's only offense against you is that they have different views on spiritiality is moronic.
I'm not a Christian myself, but I do practice the concept of "live and let live".
@HiPwr: Silly, mischievous, anti-religion, agnosstic/atheist, historically accurate (depending on your interpretation of the stories in the Bible), maybe. But an idiot? Really?
@TheDayIsMine: She's an idiot because the only thing she accomplishes by moving the Bibles is pissing off the poor minimum wage employees who have to move them back to the right spot. It's just as bad as the pedos who leave sex books and porn in the children's picture book section of the store.
There are more productive ways of protesting organized religion that aren't childish and petty.
@TheDayIsMine: Being an extreme anti-Christian/atheist is fine, but I hope she has ways of showing it that aren't completely obnoxious and stupid. Does she think that the poor bookstore worker who has to waste time reshelving the books is going to suddenly realize "Wow, my religion and faith is a lie! Thank you, anonymous book re-shelver!"
Barnes and Nobel is very good at miscategorizing books. They put "The Celestine Prophecy" under fiction, for example. While it is fiction, it probably would have fit better under "eastern spirituality". Apparently they got a lot of questions about it, when I asked she knew exactly where it was.
I don't think it really matters in the long run, though. Some people just take offense at too much.
@HooFoot: Really?! Moving a religious text to the fiction section where adults may be inconvenienced is the same as intentionally exposing young children to pornography against their wills? Really?!
@Dafrety: You've clearly never been the one who's had to clean up after assclowns like this at a bookstore.
@zippygaelle: I'm imagining your tantrum when you find that somebody's moved a Hitchens or Dawkins book into "fiction".
It's not funny or clever, it's just idiotic. All she's accomplishing is feeling like Miss Witty at the expense of the bookstore employees who have to reshelve everything.
@TheDayIsMine: Atheist doesn't always equal anti-Christian. I'm as non-believing as they come, but myself and most of the other atheists I know are pretty sensitive to other people's beliefs. I know we have a bad rap for a reason and I apologize on behalf of the intolerant atheists out there, but we're not all bad. Promise!
A little Googling does reveal some US court cases involving copyright battles over the authorship (and thus authenticity), of 'the Diary of Anne Frank.'
There also seem to have been a court case (in Germany around 1980 area) when Otto Frank sued folks saying the diary was a fake. This resulted in the finding that 'significant' portions of the diary were written with a ballpoint pen - which is a bit of a problem, given that Anne Frank died in 1945, and the ballpoint pen only appeared in 1951 :P
Der Spiegel and others covered this issue quite extensively, but the mythology continues.
Perhaps coz its an interesting story that began with a kernel of truth - and over time, it appears to have been embellished, tarted up, and added to.
i would agree that for a lot of things, it doesn't matter too much, but this is really insulting to millions of people.
@bubbledumpster: Muslims killed 3,000 of my countrymen, but I don't denegrate the beliefs of all of them because of the minority of nut cases.
Same goes for Christians. Hell, Barack Obama is a Christian and I don't hold Christians accountable for him.
@utensil42: In both instances, you're forcing your beliefs on unsuspecting people who did nothing to provoke it. The pedo example is more extreme of the two, but it's the same odious concept.
@mythago: Good thing Hitchens and Dawkins are modern scientists with peer-reviewed publishings. Can't really say the same for something written by middle-eastern shepherds 2000 years ago.
@sir_eccles: No offense (I believe the diary is just what it says) but you could've found a less potentially biased source.
@BustangBetty: This isn't amusing, it's childish and makes your friend no better than the intolerant religious extremists. Atheists are already one of the most mistrusted groups in the US: [abcnews.go.com]
However, this is pretty common among most any religious group. A small minority of extremists are typically the most outspoken/active and make the remaining majority of generally moderate, reasonable members of the group look bad.
@ngoandy: Knowing how Barnes and Noble signs are, no, not really.
The sign would say "Non-fiction" all on one line, like it should. At worst it would be unhyphenated, but not on two lines.
This is just like the Obama endcap... a prank, either by a jerk customer, or a jerk/disgruntled employee.
@iceicemaybe: I would say "obnoxious and childish at best", because I really can't think of any more honorable excuse for doing such a thing. At worst, it's hateful and passive-aggressive.
It displays an intolerance of the beliefs of others which is rather hypocritical for any person who expects tolerance out of others. I can't imagine this girl taking it very well were she to see a Christian moving some science books over to the Religion section of the store...
@BustangBetty: Presumably the Bibles are categorized under "Religion" to begin with, before your bigoted friend moves them. It's not like they're in some special "Absolute Truth" section or something - they're lumped in with texts from every other religion out there. It's up to people to choose whether or not they want to accept a particular religion's teachings as the truth.
When did behavior like this become something to brag about or defend, in America?
@Donathius: I'm guessing they either ran out of shelving space or left someone on their own.
Hand to god, true story. I was working out with a friend who taught 7th grade reading. The working out portion is important because imagine having to maintain yourself on a treadmill during this conversation:
"Teacher" - You took a lot of lit in college, right?
Me - Yeah, why?
"Teacher" - Did you read Tom Sawyer?
Me - uh, a long time ago...
"Teacher" - Was that fiction or non-fiction
Me - fiction
"Teacher" - that's what I thought, but it's tricky to remember. They really should call nonfiction something else.
My brain really just concentrated on standing upright and not strangling her at this point.
Moral?
Don't give people this much credit. Don't assume that working with books gives them special powers over fiction v. nonfiction detection. I bet if you went in and said, "could you give me the epistolary version of Anne Frank?" you could get a least three associate head explosions...
@BustangBetty: If the clientele at Barnes & Noble weren't what it was, I would wonder why she'd ever be in a bookstore to begin with. I wonder what the last book she actually read was, versus say, the last five books listed on her Facebook or MySpace.





















Yeah, because that stuff didn't really happen