The Design, Purchase, Or Wearing Of This Dress Should Probably Be Rethought
We at Consumerist understand that there's no accounting for taste, and we generally refrain from passing judgment on products for puerely aesthetic reasons. That said, we think this dress should probably never be worn by anyone, ever.
Besides being embarrassing, it's also kind of inappropriate. We've written before about sexually suggestive clothing intended for young women, and we have to think that if someone wore this to prom, she'd get all the wrong kinds of attention from boys and chaperones alike.
In the few days since this dress came to our attention, retailer Light in the Box has clumsily Photoshopped the centerpiece of the dress to a more modest display, now seen on their website. We wonder if they're also hurriedly altering each dress to also be less vulv vulgar.
Column Sweetheart Asymmetrical Satin Prom Evening Dress [Light in the Box]
The Dirtiest Prom Dress You'll Ever See [BWE]
Thanks, JD!
Post a comment
Comments:
@Vanilla5:
Wait, they can't just show a Photoshopped version online and then send you the vulva version when you buy it, can they?
@WarOtter: The company is a front for Sisterhood of the Ginormous Vagina. Someone accidentally mixed one of their oh-so-secret event costumes in with the products.
I wonder if this was actually the Photoshopped version and was their April Fool's joke.
I'm glad the above comments are joking about this.
Alex seems hell-bent on connecting this to the ridiculous complaints about "overly sexy" clothes.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. If people don't like the way a dress, or shirt, or whatever looks, don't buy it. The idea that Light in the Box is somehow corrupting us by offering a product for sale is ludicrous.
Also, I'll point out that phallic symbols are all over the place in our culture and are never given a second thought. Apparently a vagina is obscene and a penis isn't.
@tc4b: Only because they didn't go through with the scrotal sac kilt with erect penis sash. Decided it might piss off feminists.
@KyleOrton: And yes, pants with a 30" orange penis running down the leg would be just as ridiculous. I guess I don't see as many of these as you do.
@KyleOrton: Well as Alex alluded to in this post, they have posted before about "obscene" clothing. He made that connection, not me.
And I didn't say phallic clothing, I said phallic symbols.
@Chumas: That made me giggle, but only because it's the same answer I usually hear when a gal starts talking to me about her CH piercing. :)
@joe18521: The "photoshopped" picture may be another view with the top of the center ruffly bit folded down instead of folded back. I think. I could be wrong.
Wow, how did photographer miss what that looked like?
@marciepooh: Well, it's not the photographer's job to deal with that - it's the dress designer and then whoever approves designs.
@tc4b: That one looks both healthy and interested. Still, any girl who wore that to the prom would NEVER live it down. I'd market the dress to the Halloween and gay bar crowds.
@Rhayader: You're putting "obscene" in quotes, but I didn't use that word anywhere in the post. I don't think this dress is obscene. I think it's ridiculous.
@Rhayader: I'm pretty sure Alex made the connection as a joke, though.
And yeah, there are phallic symbols all over, but they do actually arouse (sorry) some comment, especially if they're placed on a man's crotch. So this feminist doesn't find the giggling particularly sexist.
@sirellyn: If only they came up with a puckered anus hat for whining commentators to wear, then we'd ALL be happy...














is there a male tuxedo version with as cod peice?