Restaurant Owner Busted For Filming Women's Bathroom
Police say that the owner of the Poloros Restaurant in Mineola, NY had a hidden surveillance camera installed in the ceiling tiles of the women's bathroom. The device, which was used by the owner to watch customers and female employees alike, was spotted by a customer, who notified police.
The camera was wired via cable to his private office in the basement, where the owner could view the video on a monitor, according to police.
The owner has been arrested and charged with two counts of second-degree unlawful surveillance.
Cops: Restaurant owner had camera in bathroom [Newsday]
(Photo:Google Streets View)
Post a comment
Comments:
@DashTheHand: I was wondering this too, I'd like to see a picture of the setup at least. You know, so I don't make the same mistake(s).
@DashTheHand: It wouldn't take much, just a bit of reflection if the light hit it the right way.
I did some work for a client once that had pinhole cameras in the ceiling tiles above some of the upper management desks. I guess they must have had a problem with people stealing from the management. I could look at the monitor, and know exactly whose desks the cameras were pointed at, but I could not for the life of me see the cameras in the ceiling tile (although I didn't just stand there and stare for long, lest they thought I was casing the joint, heh).
@Radi0logy: Yeah, but there's an except for restrooms, and the inside of changing rooms, for obvious reasons.
@Radi0logy: You cannot be legally filmed without your consent if you are somewhere without the expectation of privacy. Bathrooms have that expectation of privacy, just like dressing rooms, your house, and tinted limos.
I am in the surveillance business, not only do I sell it I also install it. This guy has got to be stupid. The way they make hidden cameras these days is scary. It can be placed in emergancy lights, ceiling speakers, even smoke detectors. The views can range from side angle to down view. All these can be purchased for very inexpensive and installed for inexpensive as well if you can do it yourself. I personally hate when people like this give my industry a bad name and give my busineess a bad name too. We work hard to give people protection and this guy and others like him ruin it. Hope they fry him. Hope he has to register as a sex offender.
@jfielder23: Well I understand the logic of it, but how are stores monitored for shoplifters? And I'm pretty sure that I've been in changing rooms that had signs alerting me to being monitored
@Radi0logy: Exactly. You can be filmed in dressing rooms, but there is usually a sign on the mirror or something, letting you know that it is happening. Most stores hire women to watch the women's dressing rooms and men to watch men.
@Radi0logy: Monitored on the way in and out of the changing room, not inside.
I used to work retail loss prevention and cameras are not put in the dressing rooms. Basically, someone is watching what you bring in and what you take out. They also look for anything suspicious when you're on your way out if you don't take all of the items with you.
Its certainly a lot cheaper to let a few shoplifters slip by than it is to pay out a claim for violation of privacy.
@Radi0logy: monitored != filmed by a camera. It could be as simple as an associate is in the area to make sure that the same items come out as go in, or a camera doing the same. But not recording actually INSIDE the changing room. :)
You're assuming the camera is there for perverted reasons, in which case, I would agree with you. But to me, the ceiling angle suggests surveillance rather than voyeurism. There are much better camera positions if he's looking for juicy material. (No pun intended.)
@Applekid: The nausea you are personally responsible for after that comment may go a long way toward legalization of medical marijuana.
For that, I thank you.
@joe18521: "I'd like to find out who's doing that crap."
That PUN is full of win! Was it intentional?
@yoni242: Just out of curiosity, are your customers typically private businesses, or are you installing those invasive, unconstitutional cameras the government uses to spy on us (red light cameras, etc)?
For the sake of the legitimacy of your moral outrage, I hope it is not the latter.
There was a guy here who got busted for doing that in a tanning salon. One of the employees was doing homework on the computer and found pictures. The guy got busted under a child pornography charge because some of the girls he filmed were under 17.
How much of an idiot do you have to be to keep the pictures on a computer at the same place you're perpetrating, that other people have access to?
@funnymonkey: No, you CANNOT be filmed in a dressing room. Monitoring =/= filming. They can film the outside, but not the inside.
@yoni242: So you are saying this guy should have purchased better cameras so he could continue his ILLEGAL surveillance of the womens bathroom without consequence?
@Rhayader: Anybody remember Chuck Berry doing the same thing back in the 1980's at his restaurant in Wright City, MO? He got caught when somebody saw the VHS tape he was watching in his office.
Historical note: Yes, the name of the restaurant was really the "Southern Air". It's abandoned but still standing on I-70.
@Rhayader: How are red light cameras, which only go off when you break the law, unconstitutional? (Even then, how are government surveillance cameras on public grounds unconstitutional?)
@nakedscience: Uhhh, so? That gives the state incontrovertible rights to spy on the citizenry?
And no, I'm not really that paranoid, because I typically don't drive very fast or run red lights. Still, I don't like the idea that unprovoked government surveillance of the public is becoming a fact of life. I tend to get weird when the Constitution is being trampled, I suppose.
@joe18521: If the cam's for surveillance, why isn't there one in the men's room too? This is blatant heterosexism.
@nakedscience: You can be if you are told you will be, and you still use the dressing room. Consent. But 99.9% of the places won't do it because of that whole minor who looks old child porn thing...





















Pics or it didn't happen. :)