Man Sues American Airlines For Revoking Lifetime Pass
A man who paid nearly $400,000 in the late 80s for two lifetime passes from American Airlines is now suing the company, claiming they illegally revoked the passes after a supposed rule violation. The passes allowed him and a companion to travel anywhere they wanted in first class for the rest of his life, but AA canceled them after claiming he made "'speculative reservations' for companions."
We don't know what fine print that violates, exactly, because we haven't seen the pass agreement. But put your wallet away—AA doesn't sell lifetime passes anymore.
"Man sues American Airlines after lifetime pass revoked" [Chicago Breaking News] (Thanks to spoolfin!)
(Photo: Irargerich)
Post a comment
Comments:
@dragonfire81:
Yeah, they don't really elaborate on that "speculative reservations" thing. Was he making reservations for himself and a companion, then only the companion shows up to take advantage of the free flight? I'd say that's pretty shady if that was the case.
A speculative reservation would be if he told the airline he intended to fly with a companion in order to hold the extra seat, and then he wound up not flying with a companion. It's considered abuse because the airline could likely have sold the seat to someone else.
It seems to me that the airline has a couple of tough things to prove. First, they need to prove they would have sold that extra seat. Second, they need to prove they haven't already sold the extra seat to the man with the passes.
@Its The Beer Talking: Hmm, I bet, as a 24 year old, I've used at least 150k in airfare (well, most of it military) so it would be pretty easy to come out ahead, specially if you travel for business.
@Kyle: Maybe I can pay $10.00 to get free ramen for life.
Seriously, though, $400,000 in late 80's money? I wonder how many other lifetime passes were bought by the young and healthy that are still being used today.
@Hank Scorpio: No. From what I understand about spec reservations, he booked two seats then only HE showed up. The airline probably got mad because they felt like they could have sold the extra seat. Absent a contract provision saying this is not OK, I think the airline would have to prove not only that they would have sold the seat "but for" the man's failure to notify them in a timely manner that his companion wasn't coming, but also that they hadn't already sold the seat in the first place (to him).
@speedwell, avatar of snark: Come to think of it, it seems like a neat (but expensive) trick to get extra room next to you.
What if his "companion" was a large musical instrument?
@Its The Beer Talking: If he traveled 4 - 8 times a month on AA (as I do) that would be conservatively around 60 flights per year (he stays home for vacations). Let's say for grins, late 80's means 1989 then we get to 660 flights. That works out at around $600 per flight and since these passes allow international too, he's already ahead & it keeps on going.
@Its The Beer Talking: So are you saying if you had the $400K to spend on something you wouldn't complain if someone took your money and didn't hold up their end of the deal?
@speedwell, avatar of snark: Maybe he felt he needed the extra room, so he books the two seats and knows he is guaranteed to get the extra room when his imaginary companion doesn't show. Or maybe he actually just has an imaginary friend that always sneaks through security.
AA better have had a clause in their terms of sale back in '88 that defines what they are trying to assert. Otherwise, a jury trial (and there would be a jury trial-no binding arbitration bullshit for individuals in those days) might just cost them plenty.
If I were sitting on a jury , I don't believe that the "speculative reservations" shuck and jive would pass the laugh/bladder control test.They would have a HUGE burden of proof to overcome...
@philipbarrett: But he could have invested that money in the stock market and until next month sometime would still have been ahead!
I feel absolutely AWFUL for you that you HAVE the money to purchase and eat ramen noodles.
Excuse me, I think my dirt sandwich is ready.
/Ethiopian
@Its The Beer Talking: So, this is acceptable customer service? You must be a big fan of DRM, also. You know, paying for something and having it arbitrarily revoked.
@kyle and @slowtowhine:
Those ramen prices are terrible! It's right around $.09 per package. I usally get a 18 pack and pay right around a $1.50 for the box, which makes life nice.
Now the ever popular Cup-O-Noodles are more expensive, typically around 50 cents per cup. Not worth it for someone so poor.
His first pass was for 250K for himself. Two years later he paid 150K for another "companion" pass. Maybe "speculative" means he impressed the girl of the week with a first class flight anywhere she wanted and canceled those occasions where his prospective girl of the wasn't available. However I'm just "speculating" myself.
Maybe "speculative reservations" refers to exactly what I would do if I had 2 passes to fly AA for life: RESELL!
I would let people know that for a fixed price, say $500 domestic, and $1500 international, they could fly first class as my "friend" anywhere in the world.
Then I would spend my days flying around the country. Average, say, 2 domestic and 1 international flight a week, and you're bringing in about $125,000/year. Professional airplane passenger, ftw!
@Its The Beer Talking: Who cares how you feel about it? You're not an interested party and you have nothing to add to the conversation.
@Its The Beer Talking: Sorry you're not rich. Get over it. Just because a guy has money doesn't give the company right to steal it from him.
@Vanilla5: No shit. He paid for the reservation so he can do what he wants with it. Without contract terms saying he can't, this is pretty clear.
I am surprised that they didn't revoke him earlier on some sort of 9/11 related balderdash.
The lifetime deal would have been especially sweet in the era prior to ID requirements for tickets. He could have made some serious cash from walk ups on sold out flights. Some of us remember when you could not only just walk up to the gate (after the lame security check) but buy a ticket from someone not able to fly in cash and then get on the plane. I think that changed around the time of Lockerbee and the need to link luggage to the person flying. Of course the airlines used it to kill this 2nd sale of tickets and charge rebooking fees.
Ah the freedom, sigh...

















Just another cost cutting effort. These companies really need to take an example from southwest - I have NEVER had anything but praise for them.