Save $360 by turning your iPhone into a Kindle? Less than a month after the debut of its much-anticipated Amazon Kindle2 e-book reader, Amazon opened its formidable e-book library to a much larger potential audience: Apple iPhone and iPod Touch users. [CR]
Post a comment
Comments:
I tried out the app yesterday, and it's pretty cool. You pick what book you want from Amazon's website (either on your computer or on the iPhone itself), and it's there the next time you open the app. Unfortunately, you can't browse/buy from the app itself, but that may be coming.
I can't see myself actually reading a whole book on the iPhone, but who knows, if I'm stuck in an airport somewhere with nothing else to do, desperation may set in and cause me to fire it up. That's what it's really all about, making sure there is never a moment that your customers are not able to send you money.
I prefer reading books printed on paper. Kindle never seemed like a good deal to me personally since the initial investment is high and the digital books aren't cheap either.
I guess if I were traveling a lot and/or commuting long distances I might not want to carry heavy books with me though, but then I'd probably get motion sickness from reading on the trains.
I have a Kindle and love it. You can read books on a PDA and an Iphone, but they do not have the e-ink screen, which leads to much more eye strain. Also, I doubt that you can read books on your iPhone for 2 weeks solid between recharges.
As for the DRM complainers, what is your solution for preventing one non DRM copy of a book from being uploaded to a torrent site and downloaded 43 million times?
Argh, replies are broken. @thorgryn: What is is the solution for preventing one DRM'd copy of a book from being uploaded to a torrent site and downloaded 43 million times?
DRM works great until that one person breaks it. Then, magically, because you are copying information and not a physical object, you can reproduce it an infinite number of times.
@ Thorgryn
The iPhone really doesn't cause eye-strain in the way that most PDAs and media devices do. I have read on a fair number of different types of devices such as treos, palms, pocket pcs, netbooks and other such devices. The worst was the palms pdas and the best by far is the iPhone. It is comfortable to read from, and I know I will always have it on me if I happen to have some free time. I don't really think it matters that I can't read it for two-weeks without charging. It gets thrown into its cradle every night anyway.
The kindle seems nice and all, but I really don't see a point to it since I already have an iPhone and it works great for reading from.
I find the iPhone screen to be bit claustrophobic. But if Apple really is releasing a larger format iPod-like tablet then it would be a killer. For now, the Kindle 2 is better and even the iPhone screen starts to bug my eyes after a while.
But hey, glad to see Kindle books crossing over to multiple devices which is a smart move by any means.
@Blueskylaw:
Exactly. My phone makes calls. My camera takes pictures. My laptop is for internet, and books are for reading.
Any single one of these is better at what it does than some "swiss army gadget" with multiple features.
@speedwell, avatar of snark:
Forget that it's the publishers who have the biggest effect on pricing, and that Amazon actually sells most ebooks cheaper than anywhere else? Pretty much the same for drm, find me a LEGAL ebook seller that doesn't include DRM.... what does that mean? It's not Amazon's fault, it's the publishers/authors.
I like the Kindle App well enough, but it still doesn't make it comfortable to read for an extended duration. My Kindle doesn't have the animated transitions, color pictures, or gesture-based navigation, but it is a lot easier to read on and shop in the Kindle Store. I've been using the App version when I only have a few minutes to dedicate to reading or when I don't feel like carrying anything more than my phone with me.
Yes, because spending $100+ upfront and $960/year to use the kindle application on your *squint-o-vision* iPhone is really better than spending $360 on good ebook reader. But, hell, it's only money.
Of course you could spend even less and just buy the dead tree versions, you can even share them with friends or resell them when you are done!
@snowmoon: I don't think the point of this post was to go out and buy an iPhone instead of a Kindle, rather existing iPhone users (of which there are many) can use this app to have at least het benefits of the Kindle Store and holding off on getting the device. Also, the application is iPod Touch compatible (starting at ~$220 with no additional fees)
@sakanagai: The iPhone is still a very expensive toy. While it can work on the touch you are still contrained by the *squint-o-vision* screen compared to the high contrast, no strain, reading on a kindle.
And, honestly, I was making fun of both since they are a total waste of time and money for most people.
@snowmoon - why is the iPhone or Kindle a waste of time and money for most people? There are plenty of people who travel quite a lot and don't want to haul several paperbacks with them. And there are plenty of people who desire connectivity on a larger screen and like the iPhone more than a Blackberry.
It's only a waste of time and money for YOU if you don't have a use for either or both. For a great deal of people, it's useful. For MOST people they're probably entertaining and useful items but are in no way absolutely necessary. It doesn't mean they're a waste.
@pecan 3.14159265: The iPhone and personal BB phones are expensive toys. Clocking in on average at $80/month to provide service to these devices they are a huge money sink hole.
The Kindle is at least cutting edge tech and a wonderful, no monthly charge, reading device even if it is $360.
When you consider the fact that kindle books are generally not cheaper, are more restrictive, and that even the ebook screen does not beat paper in terms of contrast and readability I'm left wondering how they sold so many devices and why people are so keen on using this on their iPhone.
I don't get it. I've been using eReader on my iPhone ever since I got it, my iPod touch before that, and my Palm PDAs for years before that. It's a fantastic way to read books, since you can fit a library in your pocket, and it's nothing new. Maybe the Kindle selection is larger, but I wouldn't know because I'm Canadian and not even allowed to download the Kindle app.
@brennan_bm: Nope, you still have to purchase them from Amazon.com (that's the point, after all). When you purchase a book, it sends it to your iPhone. You can see how it works by downloading the first chapter of any book in the Kindle store.
@Thorgryn: Conversely, you cannot answer/make phone calls or play videos on a Kindle. If I had the choice I'd get the iPhone simply because it does more.
The problem I see with the Kindle is due to the DRM (for which there's no solution to) -- one cannot trade-in their eBook towards new eBooks whereas one can do that with mere mortal books.
@N.RobertMoses: ...and insure that the author gets absolutely nothing from the sale, versus the 5-10% they get from the first sale.
That will teach them not to use DRM!
I got this app and bought a book to try it out. I have a Kindle 2, but honestly, I've been saying all along that if I could just buy the books for my iPhone I wouldn't need a Kindle! So far I'm finding it a lot easier than both paper books and the Kindle to hold and read in my preferred reading position: lying down. Books are a pain to my hands to hold and keep open while tossing and turning on a chaise, or in bed. The Kindle makes it easy to accidentally touch buttons when holding it in a comfortable way, but the iPhone is just right. You can adjust the contrast and brightness to make it easier on the eyes, but granted, it's not ideal to have to do this every time you wish to read and then adjust it back when finished. I will probably be selling my Kindle 2, or giving it to a friend. I've tried other iPhone book apps, but there was a lack of titles available, and the ones that were available had a cost much higher than the paper version. I still like the idea of a Kindle, but now I'd rather have an all-in-one device. I used to be adamantly opposed to all-in-one devices because they never did anything particularly well, but that was before the iPhone. If the rumors of the next generation iPhone having a larger screen are true, it'll be even better!
@Dragonis: Yeah, just like all these people trying to cram stuff into my computer. Just let it be a calculator people, sheesh! If I'd wanted a word processor and a gaming machine, I'd have bought a typewriter and an arcade cabinet!
The app is excellent. The books are actually very easy to read and you can make the font bigger or smaller with a total of about 5 different sizes. The default (middle) is perfect and doesn't bother my eyes at all.
I see this app as being a God send to the IT folks out there who want their Windows 2008 Server books and Linux books but would like to fit them into their pocket. This app is fantastic. I've read almost 2 books on it now without any eye strain. Just battery drain with the phone being on continuously.
I have a Kindle II and an Iphone and I totally enjoy them both. The Kindle is actually easier to use than a book. Horrors you say but the Kindle saves your place so whenever you turn it on you just keep reading from where you left off and it now syncs with the Iphone so you can read a few chapters if you are waiting in line of even in the john (I know we all do that). The world is changing. Got my new Yellow Pages today and it's as skinny as a fashion model. It's all online.
And sometimes adding software to a computer is free pie. The question is, does it work well? Does it solve a problem? Does it impede other functions?
In my experience of the iPhone Kindle client, the answer is 1) yes 2) yes 3) no.
My phone makes calls (rarely...I don't like talking on the phone). It also gets email wherever I am, lets me play games and music, and turns off when I find it intrusive and/or inconvenient.
And, with an ebook reader, saves me from lugging around one of the half dozen or so books I read per month.
@I_have_something_to_say: I often read out-of-copyright stuff on my iPhone when waiting for/on trains and similar.
Of course, like anything involving copyright, the legal implications of doing this in more than one country are sufficiently complicated that we'll probably see Kindle for iPhone in Europe in 2011 or so.
@snowmoon: "...kindle books are generally not cheaper..." [from print editions, I assume]
Yeah, actually. They are. While the $10 figure gets thrown around a lot, that price is for new releases and bestsellers. In general, the Kindle version of a book is a little cheaper than the print version.
@snowmoon: yeah, I guess if you dont need it, is a toy. But I have multiple schedules for work and various superiors, application deadlines, exams and meetings, so its nice to have internet and email on the go, since I am only home about 8 hours a day (to sleep). And it syncs with a computer. Not to mention whenever I get sent somewhere random I dont have to get a map the night before..I just get directions on the fly.
Not to be "getting back" but I think the Kindle is the toy...it is inferior to book in terms of what you can do with it, and is more expensive. Unless you are taking reference books or more than four books on a trip, its not worth it.
@I_have_something_to_say: You must be assuming that the "tiny screen" holds the same amount of content a book page would hold. Of course it does not. The font size is the same as (or larger than) that which you would find in a book. making reading quite comfortable. The only complaint I would have is that I have to "turn the page" more often than I would for a book, but that's not a major complaint.
















If you want to read books on a tiny screen go ahead. Logic and eye strain are your only enemies.