Capital One Card Lab Intolerant Towards Snuggie Cult
Reader Ed reports that the Capital One Card Lab custom credit-card maker keeps rejecting his request to put a picture of himself wearing a Snuggie on his credit card. After the jump, the rules for which photos are not allowed. I've bolded the ones that might apply. Ed thinks he might have gotten tripped up on the "Controversial subject matter such as political or religous statements and/or images" clause, i.e. Capital One thinks Snuggie is a cult.
Copyrighted or trademarked material not owned by a Capital One partner if you didn't take the photo or own the image, we cannot accept it. View examples.
Branded products (except those associated with a Capital One Partner)
Provocative, lewd, or sexual content including nude or semi-nude pictures of people of any age
Celebrities/musicians/public figures/athletes/cartoons, etc. (except for those associated with approved Capital One partner)
Violence, violent acts or any type of death imagery (e.g. images of skulls)
Socially unacceptable or discriminatory behavior or signs (e.g. gangs, hatred, drug/alcohol abuse, graffiti)
Profanity or other obscene behavior or gestures
Images of money from any country (including the United States) where money is the central focus of the photo
Images of flags. (Our gallery contains flag related imagery please review those images if you are interested in having a flag on your card.)
Controversial subject matter such as political or religous statements and/or images
Phone numbers (e.g. 800 or 900 #'s) and URL addresses (e.g. www.capitalone.com)
Competitive marks/names (e.g. Discover, American Express, etc.)
Any references to the Olympic Games or events
Any photo that might result in non-acceptance or other problems at the point of sale
Any printing or process that interferes with the required security features of the card
PREVIOUSLY:
You Say Snuggie, I Say WTF Blanket
Snuggies And ShamWows Beseige Nation's Cheap Airwaves
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
@henwy:
Well, they can't copyright the overall pattern for this product. Who's to say he didn't sew his OWN Snuggie?
@henwy: Except would they do that to somebody wearing, say, a Carhartt jacket? I'm thinking this is more an excuse for an out than an actual policy.
It doesn't have to be a copyright issue. Capital one obviously doesn't want products featured on the item that aren't under their umbrella. The snuggie is identifiable just by looking at it as a commercial product. We can test it, but I think a person holding out a can of coke prominantly would get rejected as well, even if the word 'coke' was blurred.
@henwy: What if it was a Slanket? I can't tell the difference between Snuggies and Slankets. I also saw a DIY project on Ikea Hacker for sewing your own, so...I think it's safe to say no one could identify the photo as a Snuggie specifically.
@henwy: I don't buy it. I know of a friend of mine who has a picture of his family on it. The family is a "branded clothes" family. Everyone has on something with Hollister or Abercrombie prominately written on the shirt. If they aren't going to allow the Snuggie, they shouldn't allow the blatent product placement of shirts.
@Applekid: Lessee, a ohone number and web site of a gang of naked jewish crips violating Barney in the Bejing Birdnest by stuffing him with yen ...
Ah, forget it...
@albear: Until one morning you wake up to a coworker at your door, and you're dressed in footie pajamas.
On the other hand, they're just so cozy.
Yeah i'm not too found of Capital one myself.
I submitted a picture of my Partner at the beach (yes he is shirtless in the picture) but has all of the "naughty bits" are covered by his shorts (Just like like every other male on the beach) and they rejected the picture of him.
So for fun I turned around and found a Copyrighted Picture (and yes the copyright is watermarked on it) of a barely covered woman in a two piece laying on the beach, in what I can only say is a "Come get me" pose.
And guess what? They approved the picture and I know how this woman on my card.
I have sent letters to customer care, and no word back as of yet. go figure?
@Pink Puppet: I couldn't do that. My feet need to be hanging outside the blanket as it is for me to sleep. I just feel trapped with my feet wrapped in bed. Yet shoes/boots don't bug me. Eh, go figure.
@albear: I personally think that if you just HAVE to have a snuggie, go buy the original product that snuggie ripped off.
Really reaching here, maybe they think it's a guy in a woman's gown and they're filing that under "socially unacceptable" or "controversial" behavior?
@cunninglinguine: They're robes worn backwards for people who don't know how to work blankets ;).
I have had their card for 6 months with a 750 Dollar limit and 20.99 APR. I have discover now for about a year with 10.99 and a 10,000 Limit. Cap one sucks. I tried calling them to raise and mentioned I have other cards with 10K. The rep said, "well, you need to use our card more at this time for a higher limit." Ok....right lady.
@John Wells: I was raising my eyebrows at the "semi-nude" ban myself, as just this week a customer at my work paid with a Capital One card featuring her and her friends in their sexy nurse/cop/etc. Halloween costumes. Not really that close to nude, but kind of racy nonetheless.





















Branded? Wouldn't that be a more likely reason than cult? It doesn't exactly have the name on the product, but it's fairly obvious what it is on site. They'd probably ban a can of coke too if all you did was blur out the printed word 'coke'. The item/packaging is distrinctive.