Shylockian Shrink Ray Extracts Pound Of Flesh From Tyson Frozen Chicken Wings
BUH-KAW! Tyson's five-pound bag of frozen chicken wings is now Tyson's four-pound bag of frozen chicken wings.
We're concerned by the quotes around "4 LB BAG" on the top right. It could just be misuse of quotation marks for emphasis, but it reminds us of last week's story about TV manufacturers adding "class" after the inch listing so they can list a 31.5-inch screen as a 32-inch screen. Are these chicken wings actually 3 pounds, 8 ounces, and they're rounding up?
Thanks, Stephen!
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
I hope they don't do this to their mesquite & teriyaki chicken breast varieties, as they are already in a too-small bag if you ask me (As I eat 6 of them at a time for dinner, a bag doesn't last very long).
I will have some for dinner tonight and make note of the bag's weight. Something to check the next time I am BJ's shopping club.
Are you sure it's a shrink ray? It could be 2 different products. Original & 100% Natural.
Walmart shows a 5lb bag:
[www.walmart.com]
@Skankingmike: Actually, the first asterisk usually says something like "No antibiotics!* ... *by federal law, chickens may not be fed antibiotics." Srsly.
There's also one chicken company that proudly sells "Vegetarian-fed chicken!" Which could be so wrong in so, so many ways.
@Eyebrows McGee: 9th level Vegans don't eat things that casts shadows.
No antibiotics in my meat is nice, but i'll take 4 pounds of chicken in my 4 pound bag too
@Keter: It's not. I bought the 5lb bag in Wal-Mart eight months ago, and when I went back recently, the 4lb bag had REPLACED it in the same spot in the freezer section.
I don't see how this is a "shrink ray" issue. The bag isn't mislabeled. No one is trying to pass off this product as being something that it is not. Since the design isn't similar to the heavier bag, it isn't even an attempt to fool people into thinking they're buying an old product but getting less. The quotes around the weight are probably because it may not be exactly 4 lbs, but slightly more. It's difficult to precisely hit the right weight on something like chicken wings because they can't give a portion of a wing to balance it exactly.
This appears to be a molehill made into a mountain.
MrsLopsided IS right. These are 2 different products. Perhaps no one here has been in college, or just poor enough to buy frozen chicken deliciousness, but I can assure you they are different.
The bag on the left is "normal chicken" pumped full of steroids and antibiotics. It also tends to be not as tender and more fatty. The bag on the right is their "natural" chicken. They are priced close to the same, however with the "natural" you are just getting less overall product.
I know Shylock was the Jewish userer in a Shakespeare play, but I've heard "shylock/ian" used mostly in a racially derogatory manner against against cheap people making the generalization that Jews are cheap/greedy.
It is like someone taking the character "N****r Jim" from Twain's Tom Sawyer series and calling a company or someone "N****r Jim-ish"
/just stirring the pot.
The 5lb bag says "All Natural". The other says "100% Natural." It seems they've used the new packaging to decrease the weight and increase it's visual appeal (cooked chicken instead of uncooked). Grocery stores have also started using photos of cooked meat in their ads for uncooked meat. It looks a lot more appealing.
@flodlogic: It seems most people are only just familiar enough with the character and the play to complain when it's mentioned.
@Keter: I'm pretty sure the feed for pink and ivory chickens is composed of chemicals too. In fact the feed is probably 100% chemicals...making them quite laden with chemicals.
@DeanOfAllTrades: Last time I checked, my water and chicken broth (aka chicken water) were natural...
Oh wait:
http://consumerist.com/366001/more-on-the-pharmaceutical-contamination-of-drinking-water
@LogicalOne: Yeah, it basically says "no added antibiotics" but then goes on to say the FDA prohibits the addition of antibiotics anyway.
Its just a way for them to get into the heads of the "organic" crowd.
If you think Tyson chicken is all-natural, I'd ask the chickens who are kept in 8" cages their entire lives and gorged with corn so they grow fast. YEah, that's not natural to me, buddy.
@Dan W: You're right... it's a lousy headline and references like this are inappropriate. I'd like to see an apology from Consumerist, and a policy decision that racially derogatory terms like this will not be used on their site. After all, it can't be done in the comments, why should it be allowed in their headlines?
@LogicalOne: The word "Natural" isn't regulated by the FDA like the word "organic" is -- I wouldn't trust "natural" to mean anything, really.
@flodlogic:
Welll, actually Shylock doesn't fit at all with the whole grocery shrink-ray thing unless Shylock perhaps wanted to demand a pound of flesh but Portia offered up only 12 oz of flesh in a one pound package.
@mdmadph: Actually, the US Dept of Agriculture regulates use of the term 'organic.'
Something I just learned from their fact sheet - 'organic' = 95% organic. 100% organic = only organic ingredients. Both exclude water and salt from organic regulation.
















I'm more concerned about the fact that they're now "100% ALL NATURAL." What were they before? Supernatural? Man-made chemical? Soylent orange?