Consumerist To LiveBlog SuperBowl Ads
I'll be liveblogging the SuperBowl ads on The Consumerist this year, playing a virtual couch buddy for those whose who don't have any friends or whose friends don't make interesting enough commentary. It'll be interesting to see what is traditionally the biggest blowout night for the most outrageous and expensive ads looks like during the Recession. Tune in to the game and Consumerist.com on Feb 1 for all the hot liveblog action, and pass the nachos.
Post a comment
Comments:
My guess is, people are calling it a recession because that is what it is, a recession.
Having the benefit of knowing and speaking with two relatives who lived through the Great Depression, they both say this is nothing like what they went through.
Granted, that is anecdotal at best, I'll still take their word over some talking head on T.V.
Maybe I am living with my head in the sand, maybe not.
We shall see.
@dohtem: To add, I have nothing against the ads. I usually make sure I catch all the ones I missed the next day.
@sebadoh128: My grandmother said all these people complaining about the recession have no idea what its like. She lived through the great depression and said there was no welfare, you had to work on the streets to earn your food stamps. People were starving, people were off at war. Big deal, we can't afford all the televisions we want. It's bad, but give me a break comparing it to back then.
Consumerist To LiveBlog SuperBowl AdsSo which is it? Consumerist or The Consumerist?
I'll be liveblogging the SuperBowl ads on The Consumerist this year...
Aside: Right now, my local PBS affiliate is broadcasting a program about illicit international trade (e.g., counterfeit designer goods, counterfeit pharmaceuticals).
@djanes1: I dunno though guys, me and some of the other fellows around town are considering starting a Hoovertown or two.
@Triterion: We'll know the economy is really bad if we see a ShamWow commercial during the Superbowl.
@crichton007: By injecting money into dead businesses they are bacically covering up the fact the recession is over and we are in a depression.
We aren't in a 'great depression' yet. Everyone is confusing themselves by comparing the "great depression" and the current depression. If you look what happened in the 1920's and what is happening now one difference is the banks are being bailed out so people aren't losing their money yet and starving in the streets.
Wikipedia:
recession:
In economics the term recession generally describes the reduction of a country's gross domestic product (GDP) for at least two quarters.
Depression:
In economics a depression is a sustained long downturn in one or more economies. It is more severe than a recession which is seen as a normal downturn in the business cycle.
Now ask yourself how long has this economy been in a downturn? More than 2 quarters? The answer is YES.
@hi: I'd like to add that a 'depression' is a sustained recession. Which is what we are in now (a sustained recession). So yes we are in a recession but it's a sustained recession which makes it a 'depression'.
@Maurs: I believe they were called "Hooverville".
So what can we call them this time around? Marketville, Spendingtown, ForeclosureCity, Bernakeville, Paulsonville, Bushville, Bankersville?
@crichton007: I only said it has been compared to The Great Depression, not that this is. I mean technically The Depression was a recession too. Jeez...
















I guess there will be Walmart ads this Superbowl :/