Litigious $54 Million Dollar Pants Judge Loses His Appeal
Remember Judge Roy "Fancy Pants" Pearson's $54 million dollar lawsuit against a dry cleaner that lost his pants? Well, he's lost his appeal, says CNN.
If you'll recall, when we last saw Fancy Pants, he was losing his case against the Chung family, who own and operate "Custom Cleaners." The sad tale began when Pearson took several pants to Custom Cleaners to have them altered, back in 2005. Pearson alleges that the pants he gave the Chungs were blue. The pants he got back were charcoal gray. This, apparently, was a huge problem for Judge Pearson.
CNN says:
He claimed millions of dollars in attorney fees and millions more in punitive damages for what he called fraudulent advertising under the law. He also claimed that a sign in the store's window promising "satisfaction guaranteed" was an unconditional warranty that required the defendants to honor any claim by any customer without limitation.
The Chungs' attorney argued that no reasonable person would interpret the signs to mean an unconditional promise of satisfaction. District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff agreed, ruling that Custom Cleaners did not violate the city's Consumer Protection Act.
Now Pearson has lost his appeal and the Chungs hope the ordeal is finally over. Of course, he could appeal again.
Pearson may request that the appeal be heard again by the entire panel of D.C. Court of Appeals judges, Manning [The Chung's lawyer] said. He also could petition to the U.S. Supreme Court for an appeal.
"It is the Chungs' hope that Mr. Pearson will not attempt to appeal any further and will end his frivolous and baseless attacks on the Chung family," Manning wrote in the statement.
"The 3½ years this case has been pending and appealed have been very difficult for the Chungs," he said. "They lost two of their dry cleaning stores and their realization of the American dream."
He said the family wants to "quietly return to their one remaining small dry-cleaning store ... to rebuild their lives."
Pearson was removed from his job as a judge during the trial as not been reappointed.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
I am of the opinion that frivilous lawsuits such as these should have a very serious backlash to the filer. If it is proven to be a huge waste of time for all involved, the judgement should be against the plaintiff and the plaintiff should be required to pay attorney's fees for all parties involved. That would stop this kind of crap from happening, or at least taking as long as this has. I feel for the Chungs, this sucks and it is destroying their business. What a complete ftard (thanks Adisharr, haven't used that term in a while...appreciate the reminder it exists!).
@Patrick Henry: I don't necessarily want to wish him enternal damnation, but good call on getting Judge Judy involved. She would show no mercy,
I was reading the Examiner this morning on my way to work and there was an article about this. I didn't know this originally, but as you may or may not know, part of his lawsuit pertains to the dry cleaner guaranteeing same day service. I didn't know this but Fancy Pants dropped his clothing off FIVE MINUTES before they closed and expected same day service. And that is part of the reason why he sued.
Regarding the satisfaction gaurantee, Fancy Pants also said, and I quote, the dry cleaner must pay the customer "whatever the customer claims the item is worth if there is a 'Satisfaction Guaranteed' sign in the store, even if the dry cleaner knows the customer is mistaken or lying." That's his argument as to why he feels that he should be given 54 million dollars.
The article also mentioned that Fancy Pants always fights to the end. He even took some of his previously worthless cases to the Supreme Court. I'm sure we have not yet seen the last of him, unfortunately.
@CumaeanSibyl: I can tell you what he has to say about it, "Petition for Writ of Certiorari, DENIED."
@24/6_GitEmSteveDave loves->★: Holy crap, I had the whole office wondering if I was laughing or crying while watching this clip. Thanks for posting. Donkey Donkey Donkey.
@24/6_GitEmSteveDave loves->★: Odd, whenever I hear "Fancy Pants", I think of Johnathan Coulton's Mr. Fancy Pants.
I would do it....for the cost of the pants he is missing. This guy should not be aloud out of his house.@Adisharr:
@Triborough: No, this is evidence that you don't read Shakespeare.
Many people know Dick the Butcher said "The first thing we do, is kill all the lawyers" in Shakespeare's Henry VI.
But what was the context he was saying it in? And who was he? They were villians planning a murderous plot. So of course they didn't like lawyers or the law, lawyers would interfere with their illegal activities.
Now, if you type in "kill all the lawyers" into google, the first result is some douchebag's blog claiming that the correct interpretation of the line in its context is incorrect. I couldn't figure out how Seth Finkelstein was able to make his result number 1, especially since it is king of poorly reasoned. But then I saw that what he is "a software developer and Internet activist" which I suppose makes it more likely that he can get his b.s. blog to the top of the google results than that he would understand what he's talking about.
I think there is one thing clear. Fancy pants is a vindictive, small, petty man without a soul. From everything I've read this guy set out to harrass and destroy this family and their business. For that, he should be forced to pay. I think they can make a pretty clear case for this and should countersue this nitwit.
@danman81: OMGWTFBBQ...seriously? Dude, you've got more issues than National Geographic. Even if you are likely a troll trying to stir up the pot.
@CaptainCynic: And for the counter suit, I hope the Chungs find a good attorney who will work on a contingency basis or even pro bono (for free) for them.
They've already lost most of their business and any money they had from it defending themselves when he sued them and lost. Pearson will take their lawsuit against him as high as he possibly can with appeals when he loses, and that's going to cost a fortune, and even then they could still lose the appeal at the very end.
Sucks to seek justice in that sort of scenario even if you think it's a sure thing.
@JustThatGuy3: loser pays would encourage deep pocket corps to act even more recklessly, figuring most won't take the chance on suing and then having their lives destroyed if they lose
@dripdrop: I wish it was feasible for him to be forced to pay up in order for these folks to rebuild the two stores they lost. He should have to make full restitution on everything these folks lost because of his asshattery.
@LuminousMuse: Yeah, um...a bit much...yeah.
I just want to gather up my friends, load into the van, and go on a roadtrip to beat his ass silly. Not kill him.
@stevejust: While Triborough was likely commenting on the popular "Let's kill all the lawyers!" which is indeed less relevant once put in context, there are several other instances of Shakespeare taking jabs at legal professionals in his works. See "As You Like It" or "Hamlet".
@LuminousMuse: "murdered until he dies forever"? Yes, the murder-death-kill is a very serious business.
@jusooho: As I understand it, for plenty of South Koreans, no prompting is necessary to hate the U.S. That's why I won't buy a Hyundai or Kia and I try to avoid buying products from Samsung. LG, etc.





















That man is the living embodiment of everything that is wrong with the USA today. Greedy, stupid, spiteful, and full of frivolous lawsuits. He's done nothing less than full blown harassment of the Chungs since day one, and what he really needs is a good proverbial spanking from Judge Judy.
I hope he burns in hell.