Walmart Sells Lead-Tainted Facepaint For Kids
This facepaint for kids, sold by Walmart, contains lead. It says it right on the package. What the hell?! Maybe it's the tubes that contain the lead, not the paint? Doesn't sound right. Well, at least it doesn't smear. Large version, inside.
Wal-Mart Selling Lead Paint…To Put On Your Kid’s Face! [Wal-Mart Watch]
Attention, Walmart shoppers! This ad is for you! Woo hoo!
Post a comment
Comments:
@uberbucket: Just curious, at what price point is it no longer acceptable to include poison in childrens products?
but how much lead. Red lipstick and candy often have lead in them but trace amounts that are harmless. Its possible that there is actually very little and harmless about of lead in these face paints but they have to put a warning on for whatever reason. If you are concerned about lead don't buy them. At least they are letting you know up front so you can avoid the product.
@mythago: It doesn't even mater if it's meant for children. It's a product meant to be applied topically that contains a neurotoxin that serves only an aesthetic purpose. There is no good reason to justify this. This is America, a country with laws and regulations meant to protect us, and enforcement to uphold those laws. We shouldn't have to worry about poisons when we go to the store to buy something meant for our SKIN.
To be fair, the product came from a California Wal-Mart. You can't take two steps in CA without seeing the "This product/location may contain X, which is know by this state to cause Y." Heck, several things I own had that label, including electronics and plastic bins, which doesn't appear on the same product in other states (the hotel I stayed at a few weeks ago down in LA even had the same warning). It seems to me that they just slap the label on everything, whether or not it's actually dangerous.
@Oranges w/ Cheese: Bill Hicks did a hilarious bit on cigarettes. He shopped carefully for his packs: "Found my brand. Just don't get the ones that say 'lung cancer'. Shop around. It is your body. 'Yeah, give me a carton of low birth weights. I think I can live with low birth weight, line 'em up..."
@uberbucket: I found made in the USA, no lead added face paint at Fred Meyer (part of the Kroger "family" of stores) for just .99.
@Serenefengshui: There's a considerable difference between "No lead" and "No lead added"
I presume the WalMart item has traces of lead occuring in it which are probably below the reporting level for most states, but not California.
@Ajh:
Oh yes, no one else considers it dangerous which is why we still have lead based paints filling up our shelves. Though I'm betting you meant not in quantities found in that face paint.
@TVarmy: I agree. Just not getting all the too-cynical-for-you replies about what do you expect at Walmart for $1, blah blah. Well, I expect them not to sell products that are toxic when used as intended.
@roguemarvel: Enough lead that they are required to put a warning on the packaging. That's not "harmless trace amounts". Why is this even being sold?
@Skipweasel: Oh, that's a relief. If the State of Mississippi thinks it's perfectly OK to put lead on my kid's face, I won't pay any attention to what those Californians think about it.
actually i live in arizona, and i noticed ALL of the adult and children costumes had that warning including masks you put on your face, so i voted with my dollar, and did not celebrate halloween this year because it is nothing more than about corportate greed when you cannot even buy a costume cheap without poisioning yourself!
@mythago: You find me something that has literally no lead and I'll eat my hat. Part of the problem with improving analytical techniques it that it gives you more to worry about. If the lead contained in it was below the amount you'd expect to find in, for example, chocolate, would you be pleased or start worrying about chocolate? Since it doesn't say how much lead, it's a pointless argument.
Oh, and lay off the Brazil nuts, they're radioactive.
@mythago:
Please note the warning mentions California. It's my understanding that Calif. has a much stricter lead composition law and requires this warning on products with any lead in them at all.
Someone please correct me if that's wrong.
@AMetamorphosis: agreed, by certainly we all know or at least must have heard that walmart is a substandard store, that sells substandard (and at times dangerous) products. Ya know, it would be so nice if the "save money, live better" thing were true, but alas, if it walks like a duck, and shits like a duck...then it's most likely walmart.
@mythago: Well as someone pointed out this is in California. They have very strict laws about warning labels. Basically if it has a trace amount of anything that could be harmful they have a warning label.
You can't go into a building with out seeing a warning sign saying the building may have materials in it that can cause birth defects.
@RodAox: That's pretty much my conclusion. In this case if you bother to just glance at what you're buying, you will the warning. If not, that's your fault. I saw a similar warning on white face paint at my local Target.
It's different if a product contains a crazy-illegal amount of lead without bothering to mention it, but this is pretty clear.
@mythago: You really shouldn't. The problem with California is there is a awful lot of people who are generally clueless running things there like a helicoptering mother.
@NilzXX: I cannot imagine any sort of negative result to that whatsoever. Besides cancer. But maybe there would be a fun acid trip! Wait, I'd probably see clowns. eye h8 clownz
I sense greater consumer protection regulations starting on January 21, 2009 ......
hint, hint, it don't matter who gets elected. Henry Waxman (D)California, Chairman of House Oversight and Government Reform Committee already has his proposed laws written and is just waiting for a majority in Congress and a President (either candidate) that will sign off on the laws.
I am a packaging artist for a company that has to place this exact warning on items... It's called Prop 65, and it is usually only placed on items that have cords or lightbulbs. Companies that buy products (like Wal-Mart) are so paranoid right now, and manufactureres are on such tight deadlines to create products and pass testing that a lot of them are just placing all the possible warnings on an item, even if it doesn't apply to that specific product. This is probably a chinese manufactured item that is part of a thousand other SKU's, in which some Chinese production packaging artist just placed all possible warnings on the packaging to guarantee passing testing. I doubt they even know what they were placing. I'm not making excuses, but manufacturers are really just being super cautious right now. If they fail testing, because of something simple, then than it costs thousands of dollars to re-test the item - not to mention the time lost and possible shipping dates. The whole manufacturing industry is under HUGE time constraints, and unfortunatly, this is the result. The whole Chinese/American relationship with companies and factories is insanly difficult to manage, and as much as we all hate it, China makes the final call in most cases.




















lead, mmm mmm good.