Wachovia announced their $23.7 billion third quarter loss with an all-too-easy-to-mock pre-taped conference call. “Let’s just close our eyes and imagine what the combination of Wells Fargo and Wachovia will create,” said CEO Bob Steel. We suppose that does make it easier not to rudely stare at the number "23,700,000,000." [WSJ Deal Journal]
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
As an electrical engineer I'm used to dealing with nanoseconds = 0.000,000,001 seconds or even picoseconds = 0.000,000,000,001 seconds.
Perhaps this some sort of conservation of numbers principle where, if some people have to deal with numbers with lots of digits to the right of the decimal point then other people have to deal with numbers to the left of the decimal point.
Heck, it might be computer engineers fault they can have big losses like this. Imagine if they had to count all that money without the help of computer they could never count that high.










[dealbreaker.com] said it best: "I'm still trying to get my head around this: What does it mean when the stock you hold that is sitting at $6.00 per share posts a $11.00 per share loss? That's the Wachovia shareholder experience."