Share:
Add to Favorites   |  

1080 views

Wachovia announced their $23.7 billion third quarter loss with an all-too-easy-to-mock pre-taped conference call. “Let’s just close our eyes and imagine what the combination of Wells Fargo and Wachovia will create,” said CEO Bob Steel. We suppose that does make it easier not to rudely stare at the number "23,700,000,000." [WSJ Deal Journal]

This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.

Post a comment

Comments:

13
user-pic
mookiemookie
Flag for review

[dealbreaker.com] said it best: "I'm still trying to get my head around this: What does it mean when the stock you hold that is sitting at $6.00 per share posts a $11.00 per share loss? That's the Wachovia shareholder experience."

user-pic

"Let's just close our eyes and imagine what the combination of Wells Fargo and Wachovia will create," said CEO Bob Steel.

Step One: Close eyes
Step Two: Get punched in the face
Step Three: See the pretty creation

user-pic

I hope Wells doesn't regret taking in all this debt. From what I've read, they've been one of the more stable banks these days

user-pic

As an electrical engineer I'm used to dealing with nanoseconds = 0.000,000,001 seconds or even picoseconds = 0.000,000,000,001 seconds.

Perhaps this some sort of conservation of numbers principle where, if some people have to deal with numbers with lots of digits to the right of the decimal point then other people have to deal with numbers to the left of the decimal point.

Heck, it might be computer engineers fault they can have big losses like this. Imagine if they had to count all that money without the help of computer they could never count that high.

user-pic

One wonders if this is a new record for amount of loss in one quarter.

user-pic

Shouldn't that number actually be -23,700,000,000?

user-pic

Wow. One company, in one quarter, lost more than Latvia's yearly GDP.

user-pic

@Tmoney02: I think GM holds that title with a $39 billion loss.

user-pic

Let's all just close our eyes and imagine a world where negative numbers don't exist... Yes. That's not -23,700,000,000, it's |-23,700,000,000|. Nothing to worry about...

user-pic

@adamondi: But a loss of negative anything is the same as a gain, yes?

user-pic

"Quick, while their eyes are closed, grab their wallets!"

user-pic

...So this means that the execs will get a negative bonus sucking a black hole in their bank account? I like-y!