Surprise! Wells Fargo is buying Wachovia, even though Citibank said at the beginning of the week that it was going to. (Check out the full post here.) Unlike Citibank, Wells Fargo will absorb all parts of Wachovia, including its securities and retail brokerage biz, in a "$15.1 billion all-stock merger." [DealBook] (Thanks to Stephen!)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
I'd really wish people would get off their "bailout" high horse. I'll be more than happy to buy your 401K @ $0.20 on the dollar any day. No one on wall street is gonna get rich selling assets at a massive loss. Hell we get lucky and we might make a profit off those fat cats, wouldn't that be sweet revenge?
@skc15: "It could be something for someone who is not relation, But it could be something special just for me."
all of these takeovers were planned and orchestrated months ago. the us taxpayer are seen as sheep to be led. there is widespread corruption.
doesn't anyone find it strange that American's bank deposits are becoming more and more concentrated in the hands of just four banks: bank of america, jp morgan chase, citigroup and wells fargo? doesn't it seem coincidental that BACK IN JULY (before the proverbial s*it hit the fan and BEFORE this bailout was announced) Secretary Paulson had a meeting with:
chairman of the FDIC
chairman of the Fed
OCC Comptroller
OTS Head
AND "coincidentally" reps from the following banks:
Bank of America
JP Morgan Chase
Citigroup
Wells Fargo
Public information dears, but amazingly happened very quietly.
@ryaninc: I lived up in Northeastern PA when the much-smaller First Union Arena became the Wachovia Arena.
The biggest drawback is that we were no longer able to call it the "F. U. Arena."
@noscamsplease:
Also, The government took out the WTC with a missile. It's true. Read about it on the world wide web.
@spinch: Or alternatively Wells Fargo might keep Wachovia's pretty good customer service and get rid of their old one?
@OletheaEurystheus: The problem with this thinking is that the deal may have arisen in some part by a bet that the bailout would pass. Wells would then be able to offload the bad paper to the Feds, thus enhancing their position. If the bailout was off the table, this deal may not have happened.
@full.tang.halo: very wishful thinking. Those arguments are similar to ones made 20 years ago during the S&L crisis, and in the end Americans suffered and one of the chief politicians involved in that clusterfuck is on his way to a possible presidency
@NefariousNewt: Well, who else could take on such a large failing bank? Maybe a foreign one, but that would be all kinds of bureaucratic fun...
@noscamsplease: Well, if you're worried, move your deposits to TD or another foreign bank or something. Since I happen to be living in China for the long term, I'm putting some money here. Say what you will about this place, but at least the banks will stay around.
@OletheaEurystheus: Help me understand what this has to do with releasing capital into the credit markets.
@OletheaEurystheus: I don't think we have to worry about McCain reaching the White House now. Looks like its pretty much all over.
@bostonhockey: i looked at WB when it was trading for a penny.
i ALMOST bought $100 of WB
i'm SO mad at myself now...









And this is why, government officials, there is ABSOLUTELY no need for a Wall Street bailout. The market is reacting exactly as it should be, banks are going under, and the smarter banks are gobbling it up the dead remains.
This is how capitalism works, dont fuck it up by getting involved.