It Looks Like High Fructose Corn Syrup Manufacturers Are Getting A Little Nervous
The Corn Refiners Association is sick and tired of people expressing uncertainty about the dubious heath benefits of high fructose corn syrup, so they're running some commercials featuring aggressively annoying people getting schooled on the "facts" about our most omnipresent sweetener. All we managed to glean from the commercials is that not consuming high fructose corn syrup makes you rude. In the first one, one mom walks up to another (who is pouring some sort of pink liquid from a jug) and says, "Wow, you don't care what the kids eat, huh?" What a jerk.
Post a comment
Comments:
1) What are the proven harms in eating it?
2) They don't say it is rude for saying anything. It seems they are asserting that claiming it's harmful without any support is stupid. That is stupid.
I don't eat the shit because I think the US government props up huge corporations with subsidies for the poison. Then they stick it in everything, including my fucking bread.
Rude AND ignorant. Come on, pick me, I know the answer! Advertising...making people believe anything big corporations want. Hope my parents see it so next time I make a decision not to eat something with high fructose corn syrup they try that line on me. I sure wouldn't say, "uhhh...ummm...that...."
@sir_eccles: Well said, if I could I would moderate +1.
I saw these over the weekend and my first thought was "wow, it really must be that bad if they're doing the anti-information campaign". In a way it assures me how bad the stuff must be.
@B: Second. Does any one else notice that products made with real sugar and even potato chips made with sun flower oil or whatever just taste better?
@ornj: I'm sure most everyone here will attest to that. I can definitely taste the difference, but it's not enough that I actually care. I do hate the fact that it's in everything us Americans consume. Like others said, why the f*ck does my bread need to have HFCS in it?!
...I think Hostess needs to start using this for Twinkies...
Guy: "Want a twinkie?"
Girl: "No way man, you know what they say about trans-fats"
Guy: "What?"
...and then just have the girl stand there with a dumb look on her face.
It could work for anything... cigarettes, salt, weed, cell phone radio emissions, cosmic rays...
We're already "dumbing down" everything else on TV, this is just the next logical step.
Our government has price controls on domestic sugar (to keep prices high) and places caps on imported sugar.
This forced food manufacturers to look for lower cost substitutes, which just happen to be grown right here in the USA.
Because the body does not respond chemical to HFCS in the same was as sugar and related substances, there is increasing data to suggest that HFCS is a significant factor in the rise in obesity and diabetes rates in our country.
@Chongo: I believe that is it - fructose is a simple sugar so is broken down more "easily" and therefore affects the blood sugar levels. Sending those levels on a roller coaster can play havok with the body's attempts to regulate it. (I am an engineer not a doctor. This is my understanding from undergrad biology and reading Atkins' book.)
I think this advertising will backfire, because it will get people to Google "High Fructose Corn Syrup" or just the letters "HFCS" since Google will do both the abbreviation and full word of it, and you see the top results of sites that talk about how bad it is/can be for you. Not enough people know what HFCS is, so this will get them to read it in greater detail.
The sponsored link is to the HFCS "Facts" site, but most don't pay attention to that link and they will notice all these links below showing how bad it is/can be for you. Great work though "Corn refiners" on making people aware of the product and how it will start the downfall.
I just avoid any food additive that is best expressed as an acronym, or that one cannot buy off the shelf at my grocery store.
We can buy sugar, honey, even little packets of NutraSweet or Aspartame. Not so with HFCS. That tells us something right there, yes?
HFCS is like BASF-- we don't make the foods you eat, we make them mysterious.
@emis: That's precisely the problem with HFCS. If something has too much sugar in it, your stomach rebels and you're sated. Sugar intake is halted. Puppies rejoice.
Same thing with HFCS and you're not sated, instead shuffling towards the grocery isle, groaning, "Moooore..."
@emis: When I saw this commercial for the first time, not knowing what it was, I swore he was going to say "You know, make you fat", to which she was going to lay him out.
@sir_eccles: Actually, IIRC, they did have a sugar reference. Homer was warming up to Flanders, and they were having a picnic. Maude didn't want the kids to have sugar and Marge says something like, "Why would the sugar council tell me something wrong?".
If the corn industry is motivated to defend HFCS (which is of course obvious and the position taken by many of the current posters), is it not equally likely that various "Green" grocers/producers (specifically, those using cane sugar and other not-HFCS sweeteners) are equally motivated to attack HFCS?
A few of the positions (not all) here seem to be solely/primarily "the corn industry says HFCS is not so bad = HFCS IS bad," but if we accept that argument as acceptable to this debate, why are "Green" (just using a sloppy catch-all term here) grocers/producers absolved from the same critique) i.e. "the Green industry says Cane Sugar is not so bad = Cane Sugar IS BAD."?
I would contend both sides are equally motivated to attack the other position/ prop up their own position, for the sake of EVIL PROFITS.
@celestebai: Don't you make Kool-Aid with regular sugar? Or have things changed that much since I was a kid?
When we first saw this my wife and I were asking what the heck that was all about and laughing hysterically. We had the same thought as sir_eccles.
Just read a good article on this. Basically HFCS doesn't trigger insulin and leptin release because the enzyme is designed for glucose not fructose, so you don't fee sated and therefore will eat more food while intaking the same amount of sugar calories because you haven't triggered the cascade. [www.naturalnews.com]
Also, does the corn industry REALLY need to advertise, aren't they making enough money already and having supply problems cause food prices to rise?@
@Micromegas: I work in an environment where I'm in contact with hundreds of moms and kids, and I've never met one who is sanctimonious about HFCS.
Personally, I try my best to avoid it. When I was drinking soda (two cans per day) over a period of a year, I began to gain weight in areas of my body where I do not normally gain weight -- in my upper body and my face. I'm small-boned and naturally thin, with a tendency to carry any excess weight in my hips and thighs, but on high doses of HFCS I looked puffy and bloated. After I cut that shit out, I lost 20 lbs in about 6 six weeks. Seven years later, I gain and lose the same 5-10 lbs, but I've never had the puffy-weight problem. Just my own experience, YMMV.
I think there has been some recent buzz that indicates that HFCS interferes with appetite control. Apparently, if you consume real sugar, your body knows when you've had enough and shuts down your hunger cravings. But this isn't the case with HFCS.
Sorry, I don't have any articles to link. I heard it on news blurbs a few weeks ago.

























My husband and I saw those ads over the weekend on TLC and were laughing hysterically.