Gorton's Wants To Know If You Noticed Anything Fishy About Their Fish Sticks
Reader Dave was doing an online survey about Gorton's Fish Sticks packaging -- and it looks like something fishy is going on...
Dave says:
I was doing an online survey and was questioned about my opinion on fish-sticks.
I'm sure other readers would also note the difference, however, they must assume the panelists to be daft.
What else was I expected to notice? His slicker is now Land's End?
I probably won't be empaneled any time soon.
Here are the questions Dave was asked:

Perhaps this is too deep a look into the minds that are responsible for the Grocery Shrink Ray. The abyss stares back and all that...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
@homerjay:
"Ah, finally a little quiet time to read some of my old favorites... Honey-roasted peanuts. Ingredients! Salt, artificial honey-roasting agents...pressed peanut sweepings! Mmmmmm..."
Floor scrapings is a little on the crass side. Is that really what you thought? I personally try to be as helpful as possible with online surveys.
Also, I don't think this fits the Grocery Shrink Ray tag; Both images indicate 24.5 oz. If you have an image of a current or previous package with a higher weight, that would be one thing, but this is just a comparison of two potential box designs for the same product, right?
Yes, this is a packaging design test...something that CPG companies run every day. I don't know which is the original package, but I don't see how advertising that 60% of the fish stick is something OTHER than fish is a good idea.
@josephbloseph: It fits the shrink ray tag because, even though the same weight of fishsticks included, the new highlighting of the "40% minced fish" suggests that there may have been more fish before. So, same weight, more floor scrapings, less fish = shrink ray.
Of course it's possible the fishsticks were always only 40% minced fish, or that this is actually an improvement, though God only knows what was in the fishsticks before.
@josephbloseph: I think in this case, the thing that is shrinking is the product quality.
I like fish sticks since it was a childhood staple, although I don't eat them all that often.
I can honestly say that if I saw that package, the fact that it says it is only 40% minced fish would definitely turn me off. I WOULD notice it, and there is no way I'd buy it.
I'm also one of those that pays a lot of attention to how many are inside. I'd be a lot more inclined to purchase the brand that specified a number.
why do they show a picture of a crusty ol' fisherman on the box? what they should show is a picture of a monolithic hydraulic machine with a bevy of rotating knifes which are used to mince enough fish so that each stick has exactly 40% fish and 60% God-knows-what
at least then, i'd be more apt to buy their product because i know they're not lying to me and the other consumers.
@mabus:
er... knives... apparently someone killed the spell check PID running in my head or something.
I think I figured out what the remaining 60% of the fish sticks are: [www.consumeraffairs.com]
40% fish, 25% breading, 35% pills
Yum!
Although [citation needed], Wikipedia has this to say about the production of fish sticks:
Fillets are formed into frozen blocks. A conveyor sends the blanks through batter and breadcrumbs, doubling the thickness of the fishstick. Then each is passed through a hot vegetable oil bath for about one minute to seal the coating and allow the fishstick to be grilled or fried. Then the fishstick is frozen again, with the center reaching -4°F/-20°C in less than 20 minutes. After packaging, it is stored at -18°F/-28°C, ready for distribution.
Well, sheesh, if the batter/breadcrumbs double the size then I'd buy that 60% of the stick itself is that instead of fish.
I find Gorton's to be the most palatable frozen fried fish product, though.
@timmus: Standard packaging is becoming blinigual across the board. As a native Spanish speaker, I have definitely noticed that trend.
@josephbloseph: I'm not sure if I'd call it crass. Telling me that my food contains "40% of what we advertise that we're selling you" and not telling me what the other 60% is, is them making a choice to leave it to my imagination. And I can imagine a lot. If they want to be clearer, they have that choice.
I say go the other way.
Create packaging that proudly announces that its contains 40 percent real minced fish.
Really, I think this will confuse people. We have been trained to see this as showing that a product was degraded and then reimproved after consumer backlash. So if you proudly announce it has 40 percent real minced fish, we'll assume Gorton's used to be worse.
Gorton's, call me.
@twophrasebark: Although I see your point I find it hard to not think of it as wondering what it had been in the past. I'd hope if they were making an improvement they would say "Now with 40%" as to imply an improvement. If they're just now being honest... I would say 40% wouldn't be a point to brag and to just leave our taste buds confused as to the magically delicious fish-like concoction.
nicemarmot, I know you had a horrible experience as a child, but if you ever get the chance, definitely try sushi with a expert sushi chef someday. It will really open your eyes. Case in point:
I had the distinct pleasure of watching my favorite sushi chef slice and prepare an amazing cut of japanese mackerel right in front of me from the entire fish that he bought that day.
Swoops with the knife, cuts the meat away from the shiny, glowing flesh and takes the fillet with a deft hand.
Inspects the cut, carves a fat slice, and puts it on a tiny square of rice. Hands it to me, and I eat it.
The smooth mouth feel, slightly cool sensation was incredible.
What does this have to do with floor scrapings? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. That's the point.
@snoop-blog: Man, I grew up on fish sticks with Mac and Cheese. Still one of the best easy dinners you can make.
@RoscoeInsect: Yeah, I've done those surveys in the past (seems pretty clear by the phrasing of the question) and there's always a confidentiality clause before you begin.
I don't know what the big deal about minced fish is. If you like tuna in a can, you're eating minced fish. Heck, the only difference between canned and foil-packed tuna is cook time.
If you want to worry about anything, worry about excessive lead, iodine and mercury in your seafood.
@snoop-blog: I love them too. People just don't understand that fish sticks are just a crunchy vehicle for tartar sauce.
Although I agree with the majority of folks posting here that the product sounds unappealing, as someone who does a LOT of online surveys, didn't the OP have to agree not to discuss the survey, let alone post screenshots of it on the web?
I can't think of a suvey I've done for a new product or packaging where I didn't have to agree to a confidentiality pledge of some sort.
Okay, I'm ready to get slapped back...
@lincolnparadox: It isn't that 40% of it is minced fish, it's that 60% of it is something else. If it was clear that the other 60% was just the breading and some fish that wasn't minced that'd be one thing. My first assumption was that there are fillers in it.
Heck, the only difference between canned and foil-packed tuna is cook time.
Cook?
I am not sure what the problem with 40 per cent minced fish is. You obviously know the breading is not fish, and there could be whole fish. If you go to a restaurant and order chicken tenders there are many products restaurants buy. Some call them chicken fritters, which means it has a higher percentage of breading. The way to see how Gortons or anybody else is doing anything is to compare it to other similar products. What are in Mrs Pauls? I promise you your kids lunch lady doesnt give out the %




























60% is a lot of filler/floor scrapings...
kp