Apple Agrees To Replace Exploding First-Gen iPods After Japan Demands Action
In what should have been a no-brainer, Apple today agreed to replace any iPod Nanos that unexpectedly explode. The announcement came as a response to the Japanese government, which yesterday asked the computer-maker to "take some measures" to warn consumers of the potential danger of their little pocket rockets. Apple blames a single bad battery supplier for the spontaneous fireworks.
Apple said the flaw affected first-generation Nanos, sold between September 2005 and December 2006, in very rare instances. The company's statement added that "There have been no reports of serious injuries or property damage, and no reports of incidents for any other iPod Nano model."
According to the ministry, Apple Computer has been notified of a total of 14 similar cases in Japan. Out of those, two users suffered minor burning.
The ministry said the incidents were caused by four models -- MA004J/A, MA005J/A, MA099J/A and MA107J/A -- of which 1.81 million units were sold between September 2005 and September 2006 in Japan.
Domo arigato, Apple, for seeing the wisdom of our suggested policy: "Return Exploded iPod, Get 1 Free!"
Apple says battery problem caused iPod overheating [AP]
Japan warns of iPod nano fire risk [AFP]
PREVIOUSLY: iPod Nano Explodes While Charging
(Photo: Getty) (Thanks to Simon!)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
@mayrc87: I 2nd your idea of replacing all exploding electronics with an electronic device of equal or greater value. Hell, I say if your electronic device explodes for no apparent reason then you should get one of greater value for the stress and aggravation of having your coveted devices spontaneously combust!
-- gc3160
website: thegc.deviantart.com
email: gc3160@NOSPAMcharter.net --
@zimzombie: Can't they just give us new Touch models immediately in exchange for our ticking time bombs?
@metalrules24: Nasty comments were due to his attitude. Not the original problem. Drop him while you can. (Unless you enjoy occasional adrenaline, due to his ''drama-queen'' fits.)
Reminds me of my ex ;)
@Kimaroo: If they do a recall, it would be probable to some serial numbers, linked to certain provider's batteries. Since Apple uses different manufacturer's for different lots and parts. Not every iPod is affected.
@Grrrrrrrrr: Japan is very strict on many levels. So they have much stricter pollution, electronic safety, etc. laws.
USA would never force a manufacturer exchange policy, after having ''only'' FOUR cases of mp3s exploding...
@Victo: No, if it were a US manufacturer, they'd just hire lawyers and PR people...pay off the worst injury cases and deny everything else.
from AppleInsider:
"Any first-generation iPod nano customers who have experienced their battery overheating should contact AppleCare for a replacement. Any other customers who have concerns about their first-generation iPod nano battery should also contact AppleCare."
I just called AppleCare about my concerns with my 1G nano....the operator did not know what I was talking about and she forwarded my call to an Apple Store operator. Anyone know of an Apple customer service email address? I will probably get further that talking with the AppleCare folks in India.
I think it's great to get a free replacement if you get one that explodes. However, I'd like to make it an additional requirement that the replacement device does not explode. Unless, of course, it's a device that's supposed to explode.
Hmm... Maybe this is a special line of Nanos that were intended to be sold to spy agencies?
I'm surprised and disappointed that Apple doesn't recall the exploding iPods and replace the exploding batteries. When there was trouble with Apple's (and other manufacturers') laptop batteries a few years back, Apple ran a battery exchange program. That was the right thing to do. But they expect iPod users to keep using their known faulty devices, keep an eye on them while they're charging just in case, etc... Most any company will recall a known dangerous product (at least, once it's known to the mainstream media). Why not Apple?
SO all it takes for apple to do right by its customers is to have a small music device explode showering the user with flesh scarring battery acid? Gee, to me it just seems so simple. I wonder how many laptop batteries, ipod batteries and whatnot have to literally explode before more careful safety measures are implimented?
I am not suprised at this, because of the issue with my bf's iPod that exploded this past weekend. We were told it would be replaced on the phone by a customer service representative, and that we could go to an Apple store that day to handle it instead of waiting until the next Monday. When we got to the store, we got a different story.
Due to this, it does not suprise me that AppleCare representatives do not know what Apple has promised. It seems to me that there is a gross disorganization in Apple's customer service line, where new policies are not announced right away to those who are supposed to be enacting them.
@metalrules24: No shit. I think some people on here owe him an apology. It seems that his attitude was justified considering that the government of Japan was just as frustrated.











This policy should apply to every other electronic in the market " if your electronic explode for no apparent reason get 1 free".