Verizon: We Can't Set Up Your Account "Because Your Name Has Shit In It"
Meet Dr. Herman I. Libshitz, a retired radiologist and potential Verizon customer who would like DSL. Sadly, Dr. Libshitz was informed that he could not use his name in his email address or as his user name because it has "shit" in it.
He tried his best to escalate the complaint with Verizon, but had little luck. First, he called the help line:
"We called their help line, and got a wonderful young man in the Philippines who told us:
" 'We can't install it because your name has - in it.' "
I asked the doctor how I was going to print that. He said, "Just say it's a word contained in Libshitz."
He had no luck with a supervisor, so he called the billing disputes number and reached another supervisor who promised to investigate and have someone contact him because " the only person who could help was in Tampa, and that man would have to call India to get them to change the computer code." No one called back.
Finally, he got a letter informing him that he could not use his name as a username because it didn't comply with Verizon's policy.
It took calls from the Philadelphia Inquirer to get Verizon to deal with Dr. Libshitz and his "questionable" name, and that's what bothers him. He told the Inquirer that what he wants "is for these people at least to stand at attention to explain themselves. I don't know if you've ever tried to get to Verizon. . . . You cannot get to them. They are insulated from things like this." Unless you work for a newspaper, that is.
Here's Verizon's official response:
"As a general rule (since 2005) Verizon doesn't allow questionable language in e-mail addresses, but we can, and do, make exceptions based on reasonable requests. The one from Dr. and Mrs. Libshitz certainly is reasonable and we regret the inconvenience and frustration they've been caused."
Daniel Rubin: When your name gets turned against you [Philadelphia Inquirer] (Thanks, Will!)
(Photo: Maulleigh )
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
@Blinden: Not misleading at all. They can't set up his account. That's what the headline says. And it's a ridiculous reason.
Reminds me of AOL back in the early/mid 90's when they decided to add a few words to their filters to improve their porn filtering. One of the ones they added was "breast". They conveniently forgot that they had an entire forum on AOL at the time devoted to survivors of breast cancer. Suddenly people could only post that they were survivors of "hooter cancer" or other colorful phrases. Needless to say AOL backpedaled on that decision very quickly once the publicity started hitting.
Because his verizon phone was capable of calling an AT&T number I would assume, you aren't tied to your phone company for dial-up service.
I hate dealing with companies that have their systems locked down so that the front line person can't make a simple common sense decision. Just goes to show they don't trust their own employees and don't want to pay to hire quality people or train them.
Of course, if I was paying a bunch of minimum wage call center script readers, I probably wouldn't trust them either.
I think it's super unfair and rude of you to blame someone for "keeping" their family name. To call his name stupid is highly unsensitive of you.
@Pithlit: It's misleading because the problem was with his desired username not his given name. Verizon would give an account to Ivanna Fuckalot as long as her username was cutiepie09. This is a stupid policy, but if it were me I would have changed my username to something else and just gotten a gmail account to save myself the headache. If he wants to spend his time complaining to the papers about this, that's his choice, it seems to have worked.
My office is currently working with an office move specialist as we prepare to relocate to a new building. She told us that she just had to take the word "specialist" out of her emails because it is being blocked by some spam filters because it contains the word "cialis". Sometimes they just don't think spam filters through all the way.
@superqueen23: About 10 years ago I was working with a search engine startup and one of the projects I got involved in was their porn filter. It didn't take us long to figure out that certain phrases should NEVER be used to identify potential porn. One of our first attempts that lasted all of about 30 seconds was 'XXX', which we very quickly realized would flag anything involving Super Bowl 30, many pages with copyrights, etc.































Ha! Just change your name! (Joking, while as a kid, he was probably picked on, too. Sadly Verizon acts as a kindergarten kid:)