UBS Closes Fancy Swiss Bank Accounts For American Tax Evaders
Recently, we told you that Senator Levin recommended that the UBS not patronize American citizens who are trying to evade taxes. His wish has come true--UBS has announced plans to close the Swiss bank accounts of such American customers and will lift the cloak of anonymity which has protected its customers for centuries. Details, inside..
The TimesOnline article says,
An investigation, whose report was issued yesterday, found that only 1,000 of UBS's 20,000 American clients with Swiss bank accounts had declared their accounts to the IRS.
UBS will not hand over identities of all 19,000 of these customers because, sources say, it does not follow that every undeclared account has broken US tax law. Instead it will identify only those it believes may have engaged in tax fraud, although that number is expected to run into thousands.
Since the U.S. economy is failing at a record rate, we can understand why the U.S. Government is digging behind this centuries-old couch for extra money.
UBS closes Swiss accounts of US clients [TimesOnline]
(Photo: Getty)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
This is largely because tax evasion is not a felony in Switzerland. Tax fraud, however, is. There's nothing wrong with those laws; it's just not what we in the States are used to.
That being said, if any of the customers committed tax fraud (and there seems to be ample evidence that they did), then they, along with UBS, should be held to task.
However, as the economic stimulus has proved, pumping money into the economy doesn't really make a difference. Though this being Consumerist, maybe the govt will get enough money to make an Anti-Grocery-Shrink-Ray. Then we can get more hourly features on products being upsized.
I guess this will flush billions of cash out of swiss banks. When you promise privacy and then bail on your promise you can expect almost a "run"
I expect that banks on the Isle of Man and other countries with more consistant banking and privacy laws to really benefit from this.
Funny how the Swiss banks will compromise their 'banking principles' when the long arm of the IRS is involved but they will not assist relatives of people murdered in the holocaust in recovering victims assets.
Shame Shame Shame
@fermentsindarkness: "Funny how the Swiss banks will compromise their 'banking principles' when the long arm of the IRS is involved but they will not assist relatives of people murdered in the holocaust in recovering victims assets."
This. Thank you for reminding everyone.
@petrarch1612: It is actually pretty bad, but still not that bad. You folk too young to remember the great "malaise" of 80-82 or the S&L crisis?
Let's not go too far down the "nation of whiners" path, though. There are a lot of people suffering right now, and it's not in their heads.
Ha...good one. :)
Believe me, I've got it all planned out. That's the FIRST thing I would do!
@Oface:
China may work nicely. When it comes to... well, just about any kind of information requested by the US government, the normal response is "screw off"
The accounts may not have a great interest rate, but you can be sure of confidentiality.
This is why all those FISA and wiretapping on terrorists (read: rich deadbeats) that Bush demanded so his administration can anonymously search through your banking and medical records (without warrant nor notice) needed to be passed without question nor delay, because otherwise the terrorists will have won. They JUST HAPPENED to notice that you weren't paying your share of taxes under the guise of looking for a terrorist link: were you funding extremists, evading taxes, or just some good ol' money laundering--without paying overdue kickbacks to your Congressmember? Wow, talk about a powerful collection agency! So anyway, why are still outsourcing tax form processing to India again? Oh yeah, to screw the not-so-rich people without fancy Swiss bank accounts...
I'm not at all opposed to off-shore accounts for use with storing money that was made OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES.
That's one thing that pisses me off about the IRS. They want your money PERIOD.
That is, if I am an American citizen and make money OFF-SHORE and do not bring the money into the U.S. or otherwise bring goods that I purchased with said money into the U.S., the IRS still wants you to pay income taxes on that money.
Does that make sense to anyone?
I understand paying taxes on money that I earned in the U.S., but as far as I am concerned, any money that I make and keep OUTSIDE of the U.S. is OFF LIMITS to the I.R.S.
@testingdude: American troops get paid American dollars from American taxpayers to protect our American asses. Rich or poor. Anyone who doesn't pay their taxes should forfeit their constitutional rights defended by the blood of American troops who are more often than not from the non-international banking class.
@upsidedownpaddle: Yes, but an American abroad no longer enjoys American constitutional rights until he comes home. And should not have a reasonable expectation of protection by American troops while he's working abroad in a different sovereign nation.
On a related note, how much money does it cost to maintain the skeleton crew border patrol that protects us from Mexico, the US nuclear arsenal that protects us from every foreign army, the strong FBI that is supposed to protect us from strategic terrorist plots, the indadequate air marshals service that is supposed to protect us from airborne terrorist plots, the nonexistent NBC screening equipment to scan incoming seaport and airborne cargoes (some of which fly in passenger planes) for terrorist contraband, a good coast guard to make sure nothing is smuggled ashore via rogue boat, and a couple of fleets to protect Alaska and colonies like Guam and Puerto Rico? A couple dozen billions I imagine. As opposed to the trillions spent attacking random countries like Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Somalia, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, and again Iraq, and I'm sure there's a couple more I can't remember right away. You talk about protection by American troops of expats. Well guess what: thy're more likely to be bombed and crushed by American troops while abroad than "protected."
@upsidedownpaddle: no kidding.. I got paid American dollars during my 6 year tour...
As I said.. I'm not opposed to paying taxes on money I make INSIDE THE U.S.A. or its territories. No problemo.
I am apposed, however, to the IRS attempting to tax money that is not made, spent, or otherwise benefited from inside the USA or its territories.














About damn time.