Health Officials: We Finally Found Salmonella In A Jalapeño!
Government inspectors finally stumbled across a jalapeño which contains the same salmonella strain (Salmonella Saintpaul) that has been responsible for the recent salmonella outbreak in the United States. Health officials found the offending Mexican-grown jalapeño in a Texas plant. However, there are still many questions which need to be answered.
Consumer Report's article says,
The finding doesn't mean that Mexican jalapeños are the source—the pepper may not have been contaminated on the farm but somewhere else in the distribution chain. On the conference call announcing the discovery, the FDA identified the vegetable distribution plant as Agricola Zaragoza, Inc. of McAllen, TX. It’s a small operation, so it’s unlikely that this is the major source for all the problems. The peppers processed at the plant are being recalled.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said that in addition to peppers, tomatillos are packed at this plant. Officials didn’t say where in the distribution chain this packing plant falls. Is it one step away from the field or many?
Still, it's a solid piece of evidence in an investigation that has confounded researchers—and consumers— for many months.
In the meantime, the government is warning consumers to avoid fresh jalapeños and products such as fresh salsa which contain jalapeños. Tomatoes currently on the market, are considered safe to eat.
The smokin' jalapeño: Salmonella strain discovered in pepper [Consumer Reports]
Salmonella found in a Mexican-grown jalapeño [MSNBC]
(Photo: Getty)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
@ARP: why the hating on the free-market? Your ability to complain on a computer on the net is certainly due to the free-market. oh well, ignorance is bliss
@ARP: Wow- we're certainly lucky we didn't have those pesky government inspectors checking our food supply and may have prevented this or mitigated it.
Hmmmmm funny, those government inspectors were pretty pesky or maybe just completely incompetent and unable to even figure out that it was Mexican food specifically jalapenos for months. And considering they are now saying its Jalapenos after finding one bad jalapeno in an entire packing plant who knows if they got it right.
In the meantime they have cost tomatoes planters 100 of millions of dollars, (which by the way your tax dollars are most likely going to reimburse) and now are going to cost pepper farms to lose 100's of millions of dollars with this recall for what? approx. 25 people per state (on avg) who have gotten sick? So I agree with you those are some pretty pesky government inspectors. Perhaps they should nail the source rather than having an entire industry recall their product. (especially when you don't even get the right industry)
Well, at least my Jalapenos are starting to come in right now in my garden. No salmonella here... :)
@petrarch1614: The hating on the free market is because IT DOESN'T WORK! It is not preemptive, it is post-regulating and self-regulating at that... for the most part it's crap. We need regulatory bodies to ensure that the market doesn't get out of whack.
And this "free market" that we're typing on... yeah, it isn't, is it? It is regulated and has demonstrated time and again it needs MORE regulation. Caps, censorship and monopolistic practices require governmental oversight, since we consumers really have little choice and even less power as individuals.
Wait, every day? Did your company's raw materials come from a source next to a chicken farm or something? Did you have to log positive results, and did the FDA come in once in a while to check those results?
I'm not trying to poke holes in your story - I once worked as a full-time QC microbiologist, so I'm just curious how the situation was like for you.
@rellog: monopolies are created by the government. They do not exist in a free-market. Censorship is also a product of the government.
Complaining about the free-market on the internet is like complaining about farmers with a mouth full of corn.
@petrarch1614: You mean the internet that was born from ARPAnet? Which was a DOD (read: government) project?
@VA_White: Onions are EXTREMELY easy -- we plant them between rows of lettuce, along the borders of the tomato bed, anywhere there's lots of above-ground plantage -- AND they keep a lot of pests out of the garden. Flip side, though, is that unless your soil is very loose, they don't grow as large as promised. So plant more than you think you could ever want, because burger onions are a myth unless you want to spend buttloads of time babying the soil!
I love home-growing onions!
The NeoCons promised that government didn't work and they kept their promise. Political hacks in jobs that require competence. Monica Goodlings weeding out the honest and hardworking. An AG prosecuting political rivals. A pResident that will not punish the guilty.
Oh, don't believe anything from this administration. By the time the data is out, at least three layers of BushAppointees have cut out the pertinent information.
@petrarch1614: Are you nuts? The natural state of unregulated, non-commodity markets is either an oligopoly or a monopoly. Recall that in the cases of Standard Oil and the other '20s trusts, Microsoft, Intel, etc., that gov't intervention was to BREAK UP the monopolies, not create them.
Capital attracts capital, to the detriment of consumers, business and innovation, unless checked. Look it up.
@petrarch1614: Well, Japan's 15-odd ISPs are competitive because of regulations. Look what happens when you DON'T obligate the only fiber ISP to share its lines- a monopoly (Verizon's FiOS). Meanwhile in Japan practically every computer manufacturer has an ISP to their name as well as some others.
@petrarch1614: I'd say this is more an issue of free speech that we can complain about the free market online. China has a very free market, but their net-access is very much controlled. Also, the technology behind the internet was based on public research done by the military (Google ARPANET). You could argue that the private sector runs and maintains the internet, but they're not so big on keeping it free. AT&T lets the government illegally wiretap the internet, and they're going to be one of the first to impose tiered, more controlled net access, counter to net neutrality.
Of course, the government could never manage a network as huge as the internet without seriously growing, which is why we need the private sector. We just need government intervention to ensure we get proper service with plenty of freedom.
@jwlukens: if those barriers can be made, then it's not a free market, and needs some regulation to help make it into one.














Thanks Consumerist! I read about this in the newspapers yesterday.