Delta To Charge $50 For The Second Checked Bag, $125 For A Third
Delta Airlines announced yesterday that they will be doubling the fee for a second checked bag, blaming high fuel costs and asserting that it's "still a good value when compared with shipping or luggage services."
You can avoid the charges by becoming an "elite" member of Delta's frequent flier program, or by flying internationally. The fees do not apply to First Class passengers. In addition to the fee for a second bag, the charge for checking a third, fourth or fifth bag, now $80 for each bag, will rise to $125 apiece, says the New York Times. Checking a third bag internationally will now cost coach passengers $150.
“Fewer than 20 percent of our customers check a second bag; I would imagine that it would be even less for a third,” a Delta spokeswoman, Betsy Talton, said. “It’s still a good value when compared with shipping or luggage services.”
Delta Raises Fee for a Second Bag [NYT]
(Photo: saramarie )
Post a comment
Comments:
@MrGutts:
Here in Dallas we are beholden to American...who spent years restricting Southwests flights through the Wright Amendment. It seems like the behemoths like to pick a hub city and then run out the competition by any means necessary.
It is cheaper, especially internationally, for me to drive three hours to Houston to fly out of IAH/Bush/whatever they are calling it these days. To me, that is a clear sign that American is taking advantage of their presence in Dallas.
Déja vu. Guess Consumerist feels Delta needs to be bitch-slapped repeatedly for this.
HOWEVER, I actually think this might be to some consumers' benefit. Delta could have announced a price hike across the board. That would be unfair for business people who fly regularly with one overnight bag, so this becomes a tiered price hike related to how much you travel with. It's actually a good thing... if it was like only $20 per bag.
Honestly, where are you going that you need more than 50 lbs of luggage? That sounds like a cross-country move or going off to school or something. If that's the case, you should look into a freight carrier. I think that Delta is trying to accommodate it's passengers and a reasonable amount of personal items, while not becoming a shipping company.
@Elvisisdead: Good point. FedEx will pick it up at my office for $4, and I believe Ground pickups are free.
@FatLynn:
I don't think I would ever need more than 50lbs to get there, but once I'm there and do shopping, I'll have a second bag of clothes/souveniers/duty free alcohol...
@Triborough: Nothing wrong with forcing travelers to travel light and to consider the safety of others by not weighing down the plane. God knows we have enough fat people to carry around already.
I'm all for it.
We solved the "baggage" problem several years ago when we went on a cruise. Called a luggage shipper, they picked up our bags at our home, and we reunited with the bags on the ship. Couldn't have been easier. Every bag had a tracking number, and included was shipment back home after the cruise. The price we paid was worth every penny - and we'd do it again. The airlines can put their "fees" where the sun don't shine.
@JaguarChick: I know how you feel. I live in ATL and it is all Delta all the time. AirTran tries but really this is a Delta town, especially internationally. I am fortunate that the majority of my flights are ATL-NYC so I have four airlines (Delta, American, Continental and AirTran) to play off each other. Of course, Atlanta and NYC are probably the two biggest towns that Southwest doesn't serve (Islip does not count).
@B: I want per-pound pricing for my baggage AND my scrawny ass. I'd make out like a bandit and I think it's quite fair. It takes less fuel to move me than the overweight person whose belly is slithering over the armrest and into my seat. So, why should I be paying for their excess (and having to deal with a very uncomfortable flight)?
@qwickone: Well put. Why should my skinny butt that weighs in at 140lbs have to pay the same as some tubbo that weighs three times my weight? The average weight of luggage has not been increasing but the average weight of the passengers sure has...how about pricing accordingly?
And I have to say I'm frustrated that airlines tack on these extra fees rather than raise the ticket price to remain competitive in the online booking sites. I know why they do it, but for people like me who actually will calculate the TOTAL cost of a trip before booking it, it just adds extra work to what I do. I WILL find out what your total cost is, so stop putting so many damn barriers in my way.
What about people who aren't overweight, but freakishly tall like myself? Goddamn all your heightist bastards and your heightist comments! It's not my fault that I was born taller (and sexier) than most people, so suddenly I would be charged more for it? Considering that some airlines tout leg room as a FEATURE and I'm constantly getting left out on that point, I'd say you little people already have an unfair advantage.
End the heightist comments now! Boooooo
Good. Frankly I'm tired of "bag pigs" bringing 2 or 3 bags on board with them, and then me getting cheated out of a storage space and having to stow my one bag under the seat for people to kick or having to clutch it on my lap. Planes are smaller today, fuel is more expensive -- it's time people stop being adult babies and start traveling lighter or wait at the carousel -- or pay the price.
@DanCentury: Read the headline: Delta is charging for *checked* bags (i.e. on the carousel). This will only increase the number of so-called "bag pigs".
@trujunglist: This "heightist" business may be tongue-in-cheek but it is perfectly true. Charge-per-pound would also be sexual discrimination (against men so it might not be noticed...suggest charging *women* extra to fly on planes, even given some plausible excuse, and you won't make it out of the discussion alive), and give a nice little discount to anexorics and bulemics, something I REALLY want to support, yes sir.















...and $225 for a fourth? $350 for a fifth?!?