Wal-Mart Tosses Student In Jail For Trying To Cash Real Money Orders, Then Sends Her A Bill
Nitra Gipson sold her car to pay for her last two semesters at Texas Southern University, where she is studying criminal justice (of all things), and was paid with Wal-Mart Money Orders. When she tried to cash these money orders at her local Wal-Mart she was arrested and charged with felony forgery -- even though the money orders were real.
“Humiliating is not the word for it,” Gipson told KHOU news. “I was horrified. I think they singled me out because of the amount of money that it was and (thought) I was trying to get over on them.”
Nothing she did convinced the Wal-Mart manager to drop the charges. Finally, after 48 hours behind bars, the District Attorney's office released her after she provided the purchase receipts. You might think that was the end of Ms. Gipson's ordeal. Nope.
From KHOU:
Gipson said Wal-Mart then added insult to injury when she got a letter in the mail.
“I started to read it and thought, ‘Oh my God.’ They are asking me to pay them when it was clearly their mistake,” said Gipson.
The letter demanded Gipson pay Wal-Mart $200 to settle a shoplifting charge. It is a charge that never existed, though.
KHOU says that they contacted Wal-Mart and were told that the decision to press charges was up to the law enforcement officer at the scene. KHOU also notes that the copy of criminal complaint they obtained shows that the store manager is the one who pressed charges.
TSU student jailed on bogus Wal-Mart forgery charge [KHOU](Thanks, nick!)
Attention, Walmart shoppers! This ad is for you! Woo hoo!
Post a comment
Comments:
WTF?
Man, I'm so glad all of attempts to have a WalMart open within NYC has been blocked.
BTW, the best part of the article is:
"Wal-Mart should be held responsible and accountable for letting this child go to jail for two days. All because she was doing what any customer of Wal-Mart should do," said community activist Quannel X
Quannel X???? Awesome
@laserjobs: agreed, they'll probably just settle and then you can pay for the last two semester AND get a car.
Cash money orders at Walmart?! Ever heard of a bank? Now that is off my chest...
SUE the hell out of Walmart for false imprisonment and emotional distress because they for had no right to detain you when you broke no law. SUE the city for false arrest!
I don't think you'll have to worry about coming up with tuition money after you finish with them.
@laserjobs: I believe that in many states, emotional distress claims are only available as an add-on to one's own personal physical injury, or the physical injury of a family member. Hopefuly for her, that isn't the case in Texas.
the story leaves out a lot that I find confusing. One, what made walmart think the checks were forged? Two, the police are also somewhat culpable in this. Just because someone wants to press charges doesn't mean the police automatically take you off to jail for 2 days (no one bailed her out?). I mean I can press charges against anyone all day long but if there's no probable cause the police just can't throw you in the clink. So either the cops in this case are mindless lemmings or there was some small iota of suspicion that led to her being arrested. This is NOT a blame the victim post, but we don't know if this girl had previous run-ins with the police before.
@Lambasted: I agree with you, but if she is selling her car to pay for school, she doesn't have the money to sue anyone. Let alone wal-mart. She is unfortunately going to remain a victim in this.
This is where instead of a retailer respecting the choice of the consumer to shop at their store the store figures they are doing the consumer a favor of letting them shop at their store and took it to the extreme and should be ashamed and the manager should be terminated.
False arrest, illegal detainment, wow, this list could go on and on but in this world, the corporation will prevail!
I don't like the idea that you can get arrested and held in jail just because a person who is in charge at the store makes an allegation that they can't prove. If he turned around and said "well this person sold me the money order, so if it's fake, it's this persons fault" would the manager have gone to jail? I don't think so. When they detain you illegally for refusing to see a receipt, do they get arrested and held in jail? Again, I don't think so. Why does a corporation automatically seem to get a free pass with law enforcement to the obvious detriment of everyone else?
@midwestkel: They could. But since it's wal-mart, and they have a whole team of lawyers, you would need one ballsy lawyer. I hope she finds one.
@ftrain:
>>Quannel X???? Awesome
I believe it's a new cell phone/midi/gps/defibrillator/mp3/mpeg all-in-one chip, right?
@Bladefist: No one needs any money to sue anyone. Lawyers almost always (as in, I've never heard of it being done differently) will take civil cases with payment being a percentage of the plaintiff's winnings (usually 1/3 I think). Not to mention that this sounds like a pretty easy case to win if we indeed have all the correct details.
@ftrain: @MyPetFly: Quannel X is actually a very very popular person down those parts. If anyone of some sort of non-white race gets into any kind of legal issue, he's there. More often than not, when the police can't find people they're looking for, it's most likely because they're with Q.X. working on their story before he gets them to turn themselves in.
I hear about his "magic" all the time.
@savvy9999:
Well, she probably called a family member or friend and had them retrieve the receipts. Or she was finally able to convince the police to retrieve them from her home or car.
@savvy9999: FTA
No manner of effort by Gipson to show that the money orders were legit worked. The store manager insisted she be charged.The district attorney's office saw it differently. Charges were dropped after the money orders were verified when Gipson provided the purchase receipts.
It sounds to me as though she showed the receipts to the manager, and the manager refused to accept it.
Wal-Mart should've been able to verify those money orders almost instantly. The fact that they didn't means (a) they're lazy to the point of negligence or (b) Wal-Mart's handling of their money order business is a total joke. Possibly both.
As there are somehow, despite all human understanding, some blame-the-victim posts in here:
1) Accepting payment for a used car in money orders beats a rubber check any day. Wal-Mart money orders are apparently entirely valid, despite the fact that one Wal-Mart doesn't know it, so why should she not have done this?
2) Many Wal-Marts have banks, so it's not an odd place to cash a money order of any sort -- and you'd think it would be a great place to cash Wal-Mart's own money orders. Guess not.
Wow here come the lawyers. . . . Walmart screwed her twice, not only did they falsely accuse her of forgery (which is a felony) they also screwed her because she's a criminal justice major (it's going to be impossible to get a job in any level of law enforcement with a felony record).
Side note Walmart you may not want to screw people who are in criminal justice/law enforcement over chances are they know a few good lawyers or can have them recommended by others in the field. Especially when pressing charges on someone who has not committed any crimes. I understand she obviously didn't have a lot of money which is why she sold the car to pay for school, but if I were her I'd contact my Criminal Law teachers(who usually are lawyers or work for the states attorneys office) for advice trust me they will help her find someone to represent her in court.























Lawsuit?