Should The Proposed Sale Of Anheuser-Busch To A Belgian Brewer Be Stopped?
Missouri governor Matt Blunt has sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission, "asking for a federal review of the proposed sale of Anheuser-Busch Cos. to Belgian brewer InBev," says the AP. Blunt is concerned that allowing the maker of Becks and Stella Artois beers to buy the St. Louis-based brewery could create a "near monopoly" in the US beer market, and that it would damage the Missouri economy.
The weak dollar has prompted InBev to offer $46 billion for AB. Meanwhile, AB, which hasn't responded to the offer, is said to be trying to merge with Grupo Modelo SAB, the maker of Corona. If that merger is successful, it could make AB even more attractive to InBev.
Does it matter if Budweiser is owned by a bunch of Belgians?
SAB May Become Target, Modelo May Not Deter InBev, ING Says [Bloomberg]
Missouri governor fights Anheuser-Busch sale [SLT]
(Photo: *nomad* )
Post a comment
Comments:
Although I feel bad for some US employees that will inevitably lose their jobs, this is no different than the countless other mergers that have happened. Doesn't a South African company own Miller (or is that Guiness)?
Monopoly? That's pushing it. By that definition, AB has a monopoly now. Becks and Stella don't exactly corner the entire beer market.
Besides, if they can make Bud taste more like Stella, Hoegaarden, or Leffe, I'm all for it.
States, towns, cities, etc. need to realize that they're going to get screwed over if they offer any special incentives to businesses to come to their town or stay. Often, there's a huge net loss (and not gain) to the area because of such incentives. Look at Wal-mart. The town builds all this infrastructure, charges the almost no taxes, allows other businesses to wither, and then acts surprised when the HQ, plant, etc. gets sold or shut down. So towns either need to say no, you pay just like anyone else or put in a penalty that says, "you're going to pay us $X if you leave or employ fewer than X people."
@speedwell: It's not clear to me how you could purposefully make Budweiser a worse beer. At least if you put poison in it, you'd die and people could say "Well he had a Bud, he definitely deserved it", which would be a vast improvement over Bud in its current state.
@Dead Wrestlers Society: As long as the beer they make is better then most of the stuff busch puts out.
@choinski: The irony is that the people the paid "men on the street" claim they "could have a beer with" don't touch the stuff.
@arras: Amen! Budwiser isn't any better then bottled urine. Not that I've tried bottled urine or urine in general.
@choinski: John is too old for beers. They interfere with his medications, and he can't sleep if he drinks alcohol after 3 pm. Would you like a nice Sanka instead? And there's Postum too.
That's hilarious that Gov. Matt is arguing that InBev will create a monopoly, as opposed to the current AB monopoly. Stella Artois is sorta like the Budweiser of France-Belgium, so it works for me.
St. Louis: America's next East St. Louis?
@satoru: Since I've never had a beer I liked, I'm forced to conclude that I really just don't like beer. (Yes, you can have mine. Heh)
@choinski: You'd think that because of the possible political fallout over this that the sale would either be delayed or stopped. Especially with the beer swilling legions in the red states.
What is funny is that a few years back Canada went through the same thing when Molson got swallowed up by Coors. I don't remember any people here in the states calling for the kibosh to be put on that.
If you really want to support Americans buy some of the great domestic homebrews out there.
Flavor isn't the issue here. It's market control, which opens up the opportunity for unfair price manipulation and pressure on competition. Think Microsoft or Ma Bell.
Yes, Belgians have a reputation for great beer, but I doubt that's little more than a selling point to investors when spoken about in InBev's board room.
I say let's keep what remains of corporate diversity.
@dtmoulton: There is nowhere near a monopoly in brewing and there never will be. As it is companies like Bud are loosing market share to microbrews, premium beers, and wine. The only difference you would see by this merger is more Stella and Becks on tap when they use Bud's massive distribution network.
Budweiser is good stuff for the price. Don't get me wrong I love microbrews, but when it comes to drinking around a case per weekend, I'm not going to head up the party packing a case of sixers of some $8/six beer.
And keep AB American, its a great company we have and makes a huge impact on the nation.
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa! Let's clear a few things up here! AB wants to buy Modelo to FEND OFF InBev. The whole reason they are working with them is to make themselves too expensive for InBev, who sent AB a letter Sunday telling them you better NOT! Seriously, that is what they did.
Also, I've only been around the STL for six years now, and it is a POS town compared to great brew cities like Milwaukee, but you have to understand that the people here went through the whole TWA/Carl Ichan debacle. Oh sure! Lambert will remain an important airport! Oh sure! We will be hands off and allow you to keep running things the way they are being run now!
By the time I moved here, Lambert was a shadow of its former self, and TWA was swallowed whole by American Airlines. Sure, it's crappy beer, but it's a way of life, a great company to work for, and it is the only thing keeping dowtown STL from becoming another Kabul.
Besides, Michelob Ultra in Tuscan Orange Grapefruit is kinda yummy.
budweiser is drinkable and a fairly consistent *american* lager. nothing terribly special about it, but the price is decent. however, the best taste/price ratio i've found is PBR - its better than BUD and about is about $6.49-$6.99 for a 12 pack (NE Indiana).
that being said, being the broke-ass that i am, i usually succumb to drinking the mass-brewed american beers because its the only way to rack up frequentl flier miles on cirrhosis airlines. but, when i'm in the mood for a splurge, stella artois (an InBev brew) is tops in taste and availability. but nothing beats a downhome microbrew like hops juice from two brothers (warrenville, il), warbird t-6 (fort wayne, in) or fat tire (colorado). or even a good import DAB, kirin ichiban special premium reserve, or a nice frothy glass of hacker pschorr.
honestly i'm not that worried about this whole mess. hopefully this new behemoth of the alcohol world will be great enough to have someone come to their senses and get miller genuine piss off of the market. miller tastes like corn and NOTHING like a beer should. blech. no wonder all my friends call it "swiller".. that would be sweet justice.
I'm with the non-snobs. I love me Guiness, and the microbrews too but some occasions just call for a Budweiser, and nothing else will really work.
The free market side of me says let the sale go through as AB would stand to make a tidy profit on the sale of stock. However, the pessimist in me sees the potential of plant closings and mass unemployment which the city of St. Louis could most certainly do without at this time.
Tough call for the board on this one.
Besides, what would happen to our beloved Clydesdales?The Belgians might turn them into steaks or roasts. But the most poetic recipe would definitely be a carbonnade a la flamande "mode Clydesdale."
"I guess when your choices are Bud or Pabst in college, you kind of grow an affinity to Bud."
@darksunfox: you're kidding, right?
No man, I hate PBR. Maybe from drinking too much of it at Winona State, but I hate can't stand that stuff anymore... I'm not going to go nuts and say it tastes like a litter box, but it's close. I'm not a huge bud drinker, usually go for something pricier, but if you gave me two bottles (well... cans, in PBR's case) to choose from PBR or Bud I'd choose Bud every time. Good lighter beer for the summer if you can't find a Honey Weiss.
if the belgians buy Bud i doubt it will taste any different. you think they're going to import some Benedictine monks and start making abbey ale in St. Louis? um, no. To tell the truth, they don't even make their own beer that well: While stella has a reputation as a high-end yet widely-available brew, it's actually not that good. Becks is decent, but again, that probably has more to do with the brewery that started becks and developed its recipe before being bought out by InBev.
Bud is too much of an American institution for some snooty Belgians to come in here and fancy it up and risk alienating the millions of Americans who buy it every day. If there were any changes, i'd guess it would be to introduce more bud-variations like budweiser select.
Bottom line is that bud, like coors light, miller, and others, if cold enough, are suitably palatable to make it possible to drink enough of them to get you buzzed or drunk without retching at the flavor. Other brews, malt liquors like colt 45, old english, etc., are outrageously disgusting no matter how cold they are. higher end mass brews like sierra nevada, sam adams, and brooklyn brewery, are quite tasty, and not prohibitively expensive. but for real beer quality, try something like Dogfish Head, Ommegang, Southern Tier, the Rogue brewery, or Anchor Steam. There are so many great american microbrews out there. i'd rather drink one good pint of microbrew than six bottles of bud (if this makes me a snob, so be it. I also brew my own beer- BELGIAN STYLE- so i guess i'm really far over that line.)
Nobody cares that foreign companies own US ports, bridges and highways. But were supposed to get all up in arms about buying out a beer company. I am far more worried about foreign ownership of critical infrastructure. Don't even get me started about the foreign conglomerate that refuses to state who their foreign owners are but want to buy a majority share of CSX (major owner of rail lines in the US).






















selling off budweiser to a real brewer would only improve that crappy beer....mmm becks