Even Garbage Bags Are Not Immune To The Grocery Shrink Ray
Now that you have to buy more packages of your favorite orange juice, ice cream, and butter to get the same amount of the product as you used to get in one package... you're bound to have more garbage, right? Just a little bit more?
Well, that's just too bad for you, because even the trash bags are not immune from the evil grocery shrink ray.
Reader annelise13 says:
As I was picking up an 80-pack of Glad trash bags at the store last week, I thought to myself "Didn't there used to be around 90 per package for this exact same price?" Sure enough, when I checked the old box back at my house there were 96 in it!
You can't win, can you?
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
@squatchie44: These sell for about $11.00 a box, or nearly 15 cents each. Using one bag a week, it's more like a buck fifty a year.
But we've seen posts here about far less money. It's the damn principle of "hidden inflation" that I bet is NOT reflected in the government's "inflation" figures.
@squatchie44: But when ever single product shrinks, it really adds up.
Another one to note is when something is offered in different flavors (like crackers). Often the boxes are all identical, but the contents differ by as much as 20%. I find that a little deceptive. You can't expect the average consumer to perform that kind of math on every single item.
Just like nutrition labels are standardized, I'd love to see price-per-ounce standardized. The better grocery stores already do this on the price sticker.
It's not the cost nearly as much as the trickiness of the whole thing - they charge the same price and use almost the exact same container so we won't notice we're getting less of the actual product.
Sure, by my estimate this is only going to cost me about $7 extra a year, but it's only one of many products I buy to maintain my household. If all of those products go up by the same amount, it's really going to add up, isn't it?
Time to trade down.
Yes, costs for petrochemical products have gone up. Won't argue that. But with these big national brands you are also paying for MANY layers of corporate fat and marketing costs that are factored into the price.(Think animated cartoon ads and movie tie-ins)Find a good store brand or generic substitute (don't experiment with your own money,ask a friend for their recommendations)and keep the difference in your pocket. Unless there is absolutely no substitute available (rare,these days)tell the big companies to stick it.
Above all, remember the old saying-
"Give a man a fish and three days later he will stink if he forgets that it is in his back pocket"
"Teach a man to fish and there will eventually be a jerk at both ends of a fishing pole"
@Sir Winston Thriller: That old man lied! He said Colombo yogurt wasn't going to shrink like namby pamby Dannon! I thought he liked things big! Unless...
Everything's getting smaller, and sooner or later it'll be the plastic bags we carry our groceries.
So I'm not insane! I hadn't had a Klondike bar in a million years (apparently there were things that I wouldn't do), and as I was eating it I couldn't help but thinking that when I was younger, they were thicker.
@backbroken: Hmmm... my answer to "What Would You Do For a Klondike Bar" is now 50% less interesting.
Eh. I don't think this story is accurate as a "current day" thing. At the stores near me they have always stocked grocery bags that had varying quantities of bags for the exact same price. I kid you not. You could get the exact same garbage bags in a box that had (for example) 36, 40 or 44 bag count for the exact same price.
It never made sense. I don't think this is anything new. There are a lot of SKUs out there at the exact same price with different quantities.
I don't understand why people buy trash bags like these anyway. I use plastic grocery bags in my small trash cans, and for my kitchen trash can, I have a few gigantic of "business" type trash bags I bought from a janitorial supply company. These break down to a few pennies per bag, and have enough to last me several years.
@squatchie44: Well, an extra 8 cents per product multiplied over the course of a year....You might actually notice that one. Everything seems to be going up just a little at a time. Every grocery trip probably costs an extra buck or two and that can add up quickly.
@Preyfar: I've been buying the same size box at the same store for about the same price for 2+ years. There are smaller sizes, but there were no longer 96 count boxes available on the shelves at all. It was a change that was immediately obvious to me. This is not an instance where I simply bought a smaller box for the same price/bag.
I just noticed that Pampers are going the same way, for those of you who need such thing. Picked up the last 80 ct box on the shelf at Target the other day. All the other boxes on the shelf were 76ct. Strangely enough, the new boxes were also much smaller, at least 30 percent. So they are saving on both ends. Not a huge deal, as we seem to be headed into potty training turf.
And before you ask, yes, we did try the generics and store brands, and honestly, they were awful. I'd have told you they were all pretty much the same if you had asked me two years ago, but the pampers win in fit and absorption hands down. It could be because my son is blessed like me with being quite thin, and also like me cursed with having no ass.
@dry-roasted-peanuts: We haven't bought bags in about that long either. They are a waste of money and oil when you get a grocery bag with nearly every purchase. We are in the odd position of having to make an effort to remember to get bags (rather than bringing our own) once in awhile so we don't run out.
Small apartment, small footprint.
The new packaging doesn't have an Easy Spout? Quelle disappointment.
@lockdog: Not to get too off-topic, but we buy diapers almost exclusively at Amazon these days, and they've stayed around $40 for 176-pack of size 3 (the price fluctuates, but not by much). It doesn't really make sense to get anything smaller unless we run out and can't wait for a shipment or the baby's moving onto a new size (even then, there's enough of an overlap that you probably don't need anything smaller than a 100-pack). It's not like she's going to stop peeing and shitting.
@DamThatRiver: That is fine if you steal plastic bags from a school, but for those of us who pay for them, this is an interesting news story...
What's the phrase in the lower right of the 80-count box? It looks like it says 3-something, so it may be a thicker bag. That can explain why it's a smaller box. The garbage bags I buy have a "scented" version that costs the same, just has less bags in it. I wonder if this is the same type of thing?
Real slick how the package is almost identical in size and graphics/printing-except for the 80 count.
I compare this to bleach shrink,1 gallon of bleach was reduced to 96oz then 60oz.They were shelved and advertised with price in BOLD print and the size in FINE tiny print.And the bottle was packaged the same except for the print that said 96oz.
Potato chips and pretezels have been doing the samething at the dollar stores.16oz down to 15 oz,used to have a 18-20 oz bonus bag.Potato chips are really bad dropped from 11 oz to 8 oz and now 5 oz.
@MissTicklebritches:
That's what I was thinking, only you need the same *number* of bags to make sure you keep buying them.
You just need smaller bags because the items you're throwing away are smaller.






















It makes perfect sense. The other products you buy have gotten smaller, so you need fewer garbage bags to dispose of the waste. Done, and done!