Share:
Add to Favorites   |  

Even Garbage Bags Are Not Immune To The Grocery Shrink Ray

10401 views

Now that you have to buy more packages of your favorite orange juice, ice cream, and butter to get the same amount of the product as you used to get in one package... you're bound to have more garbage, right? Just a little bit more?

Well, that's just too bad for you, because even the trash bags are not immune from the evil grocery shrink ray.

Reader annelise13 says:

As I was picking up an 80-pack of Glad trash bags at the store last week, I thought to myself "Didn't there used to be around 90 per package for this exact same price?" Sure enough, when I checked the old box back at my house there were 96 in it!

You can't win, can you?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.

Post a comment

Comments:

60
user-pic

It makes perfect sense. The other products you buy have gotten smaller, so you need fewer garbage bags to dispose of the waste. Done, and done!

user-pic

that extra 8 cents every two years is really going to kill me as well

user-pic

Makes sense. Uses petroleum to make the bags.

user-pic

@squatchie44: These sell for about $11.00 a box, or nearly 15 cents each. Using one bag a week, it's more like a buck fifty a year.

But we've seen posts here about far less money. It's the damn principle of "hidden inflation" that I bet is NOT reflected in the government's "inflation" figures.

user-pic

In other news..... They sell 24 34 100 packs.. ect...

user-pic

Now killers are going to have to make an extra trip to the store to get rid of their dead bodies.

user-pic

@squatchie44: But when ever single product shrinks, it really adds up.


Another one to note is when something is offered in different flavors (like crackers). Often the boxes are all identical, but the contents differ by as much as 20%. I find that a little deceptive. You can't expect the average consumer to perform that kind of math on every single item.


Just like nutrition labels are standardized, I'd love to see price-per-ounce standardized. The better grocery stores already do this on the price sticker.

user-pic

How dissapointing that the packaging doesn't shout a slogan like New Size! Same Price!

user-pic

It's not the cost nearly as much as the trickiness of the whole thing - they charge the same price and use almost the exact same container so we won't notice we're getting less of the actual product.


Sure, by my estimate this is only going to cost me about $7 extra a year, but it's only one of many products I buy to maintain my household. If all of those products go up by the same amount, it's really going to add up, isn't it?

user-pic

@timmus: Thanks for the reminder. Don't want to run out of bags while on my "errands".

user-pic

Time to trade down.
Yes, costs for petrochemical products have gone up. Won't argue that. But with these big national brands you are also paying for MANY layers of corporate fat and marketing costs that are factored into the price.(Think animated cartoon ads and movie tie-ins)Find a good store brand or generic substitute (don't experiment with your own money,ask a friend for their recommendations)and keep the difference in your pocket. Unless there is absolutely no substitute available (rare,these days)tell the big companies to stick it.

Above all, remember the old saying-

"Give a man a fish and three days later he will stink if he forgets that it is in his back pocket"

"Teach a man to fish and there will eventually be a jerk at both ends of a fishing pole"

user-pic

80 isn't all that round of a number. A few months down the road, they'll need to round it off better by going to 75. And hey, as long as they're going that, why not go further and make it 72? Yeah, that's it: 72 is the new 96.

user-pic

Anyone notice that yogurt containers have gotten smaller? Colombo, Breyer's, and a few other have gotten smaller by a few ounces--same old price.

user-pic

The bags have started to get smaller too.

user-pic

To which I say and will continue to say: why can't other countries consume less, so that mine may consume more?

user-pic

Have you seen what they've done to Klondike bars of ice cream? They must be 50% smaller.


Yes, this isn't news. But where else am I going to complain about it?

user-pic

@Sir Winston Thriller: That old man lied! He said Colombo yogurt wasn't going to shrink like namby pamby Dannon! I thought he liked things big! Unless...

Everything's getting smaller, and sooner or later it'll be the plastic bags we carry our groceries.

user-pic

It will show up in government inflation figures as people will ultimately have to spend more $$ to get the number of bags they need over a given period of time.


All of these "shrinkage" stories make me think of Seinfeld.

user-pic

@Belabras: 13 gallons isnt 13 gallons?

user-pic

Everythings getting smaller? Or we're just getting bigger....?????


hmmmmm.

user-pic

So, when did Reducto start consulting for food manufacturers?

"Back off! I've got a shrink ray!"

user-pic

@backbroken:

So I'm not insane! I hadn't had a Klondike bar in a million years (apparently there were things that I wouldn't do), and as I was eating it I couldn't help but thinking that when I was younger, they were thicker.

user-pic

@HeartBurnKid...

Round about the time BirdGirl had him for lunch in the courtroom.

user-pic

@skc15: I actually thought that two days ago when I had one. That's sad. Why the Klondoke bar?

user-pic

@backbroken: Hmmm... my answer to "What Would You Do For a Klondike Bar" is now 50% less interesting.

user-pic

See, this is why being single and living 5blocks away from a grocery store is nice. Buy fewer groceries more frequently, get plastic bags, use the bags as trash bags. Haven't bought trash bags in about 2 years.

user-pic

@Applekid: Is it unchanged if two bars are on offer?

user-pic

I could swear they've always sold the 80 instead of 96 bags. But then there's the picture proof right there.

AND Alabama is backwards anyway, dammit!

user-pic

This has been happening for years! A company is constantly looking for ways to make MORE money. OLD NEWS!

user-pic

Eh. I don't think this story is accurate as a "current day" thing. At the stores near me they have always stocked grocery bags that had varying quantities of bags for the exact same price. I kid you not. You could get the exact same garbage bags in a box that had (for example) 36, 40 or 44 bag count for the exact same price.

It never made sense. I don't think this is anything new. There are a lot of SKUs out there at the exact same price with different quantities.

user-pic

I don't understand why people buy trash bags like these anyway. I use plastic grocery bags in my small trash cans, and for my kitchen trash can, I have a few gigantic of "business" type trash bags I bought from a janitorial supply company. These break down to a few pennies per bag, and have enough to last me several years.

user-pic

Meh. I get bags from a friend who is a janitor at a middle school, and for smaller trash bins, I use plastic bags

user-pic

@squatchie44: Well, an extra 8 cents per product multiplied over the course of a year....You might actually notice that one. Everything seems to be going up just a little at a time. Every grocery trip probably costs an extra buck or two and that can add up quickly.

user-pic

I bought a "big" sized bag of Fritos yesterday and although the price was the same as it has been the bag looks like it has mysteriously shrunken at least 1/3!

user-pic

@Preyfar: I've been buying the same size box at the same store for about the same price for 2+ years. There are smaller sizes, but there were no longer 96 count boxes available on the shelves at all. It was a change that was immediately obvious to me. This is not an instance where I simply bought a smaller box for the same price/bag.

user-pic

@skc15: Oh thank god. lol They are smaller. I thought my hands had grown!

user-pic

I just noticed that Pampers are going the same way, for those of you who need such thing. Picked up the last 80 ct box on the shelf at Target the other day. All the other boxes on the shelf were 76ct. Strangely enough, the new boxes were also much smaller, at least 30 percent. So they are saving on both ends. Not a huge deal, as we seem to be headed into potty training turf.

And before you ask, yes, we did try the generics and store brands, and honestly, they were awful. I'd have told you they were all pretty much the same if you had asked me two years ago, but the pampers win in fit and absorption hands down. It could be because my son is blessed like me with being quite thin, and also like me cursed with having no ass.

user-pic

@dry-roasted-peanuts: We haven't bought bags in about that long either. They are a waste of money and oil when you get a grocery bag with nearly every purchase. We are in the odd position of having to make an effort to remember to get bags (rather than bringing our own) once in awhile so we don't run out.

Small apartment, small footprint.

user-pic

The new packaging doesn't have an Easy Spout? Quelle disappointment.

@lockdog: Not to get too off-topic, but we buy diapers almost exclusively at Amazon these days, and they've stayed around $40 for 176-pack of size 3 (the price fluctuates, but not by much). It doesn't really make sense to get anything smaller unless we run out and can't wait for a shipment or the baby's moving onto a new size (even then, there's enough of an overlap that you probably don't need anything smaller than a 100-pack). It's not like she's going to stop peeing and shitting.

user-pic

@DamThatRiver: That is fine if you steal plastic bags from a school, but for those of us who pay for them, this is an interesting news story...

user-pic

What's the phrase in the lower right of the 80-count box? It looks like it says 3-something, so it may be a thicker bag. That can explain why it's a smaller box. The garbage bags I buy have a "scented" version that costs the same, just has less bags in it. I wonder if this is the same type of thing?

user-pic

Real slick how the package is almost identical in size and graphics/printing-except for the 80 count.


I compare this to bleach shrink,1 gallon of bleach was reduced to 96oz then 60oz.They were shelved and advertised with price in BOLD print and the size in FINE tiny print.And the bottle was packaged the same except for the print that said 96oz.


Potato chips and pretezels have been doing the samething at the dollar stores.16oz down to 15 oz,used to have a 18-20 oz bonus bag.Potato chips are really bad dropped from 11 oz to 8 oz and now 5 oz.

user-pic

@MissTicklebritches:
That's what I was thinking, only you need the same *number* of bags to make sure you keep buying them.
You just need smaller bags because the items you're throwing away are smaller.

user-pic

Since we live in a society that does allow competition, you are free to compare the value of the new offering to other bags on the market.. Or wait, were you trying to make some 'Glad is evil' statement?

user-pic

I heard Trojan is going to start making their regular condoms smaller as well.

user-pic

Another victim of this, and unfortunately I don't have photos, but the State Fair corn dogs boxes have gone from 16 down to 14 and the price has stayed the same.

user-pic

Wait !! Where's the statement from the spokesperson of the "Glad Family of Products" telling me how less of their product will "enhance my shopping experience" ?