Dear New York Philharmonic: Please Don't Call Me In The Middle Of Performances To Ask For Money
As I enjoyed the New York Philharmonic's production of Tosca this past Tuesday, I received a solicitation call. From the New York Philharmonic.
My phone was thankfully on silent, so I didn't notice the missed a call until the first intermission. When I got home, I looked up the strange number: (212) 875-0583. To my shock, here's what I found:
The Philharmonic called again on Thursday. Here's approximately how the conversation went.
New York Philharmonic: I'm calling to invite Mr. and Mrs. Greenberg-Berger to subscribe to our 2008-2009 season.
Me: Do you realize that you called on Tuesday when I was at the Philharmonic?
NYP: Really? Oh no. But your phone wasn't on, right?
Me: No, it wasn't. Because that would have been inconsiderate.
Concerts usually start at 7:30 or 8:00, but the Philharmonic makes solicitation calls until 8:30. Apparently, they don't check purchase histories to make sure that their marks aren't already in the audience. Nor do they care if people have repeatedly, expressly, asked not to be called.
This wasn't even the Friends of the New York Philharmonic, with whom I've previously expressed my displeasure and frustration, but the Philharmonic itself.
I understand why the Philharmonic is a vicious fundraiser: renovating Avery Fischer Hall won't be cheap, and the youngins just aren't flocking to hear the orchestra's stunning performances. I empathize. Really, I do. But please, again, I beg of you—stop calling me! Especially if I'm already there!
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
Why not change your ringtone to something that only plays when the New York Philharmonic calls? That way, the next time you are in the concert, during some near silent passage of Dvorak, you can also here the wafting sounds of "Wanksta" by 50 cent? That should get the point across.
Oh, and the part of you looking like an jackoff for having your cell on during a performance? Don't worry about it, you already have that part covered.
@Dakine: @NumberFiveIsAlive: That's ridiculous. Just because someone enjoys the Philharmonic - and perhaps saves their money to go instead of buying video games or going to the movies - doesn't make them elitist rich. This is ironic and amusing, but there's no call to get all snotty just because someone enjoys the symphony.
@NumberFiveIsAlive:
Your ignorance is astounding. You have to be wealthy to enjoy such things? I love the arts but I'm by no means wealthy.
I don't know why I even bother reading the comments here as they're invariably insulting within the first two or three remarks. Why on earth do you people read this blog if your main interest is in belittling those who post items?
@MumbletyEmma: Yeah, for real, we attend all kinds of arts events just because WE LIKE THEM, not because we're dripping in money. And there's always a bunch of music-loving poor college kids in the cheap seats when we go to the symphony. So we spend our money on the symphony rather than on arena concerts; the ticket cost is comparable, how does that make us rich?
Let's not be too harsh with our fellow commenters, or say anything to discredit the common misconception that us bloggers are exceptionally wealthy.
For those who care, the tickets were $12.
I'm just frustrated that they won't stop calling; and I don't have catalogs to burn.
@brettt: You don't care when telemarketers call you? Isn't it a quintessential consumer issue. God, I've come to hate this blog, and yet I can't seem to stop reading it.
I think some people are being a bit overly rude, but I do agree its a non story. That doesn't mean we can't over other stories. Not everything need to focus on the war, famine, or recessions.
In that case, I think Gizmodo should stop, Consumerist should stop until all people are no longer hungry and all wars have stopped. Get a life!!!
@Dakine: @NumberFiveIsAlive: You people are terrible.
A) Suffering is relative. So is annoyance.
B) No matter his or her income level, it's still poor form to contact someone during a performance.
C) Do you know their financial history? Here, let me throw some conjecture your way:
You have a computer and are posting on the internet. You have free time and make enough money to own a computer! You're clearly wealthy!
-Dude pays philharmonic for their services.
-Homeboys at philharmonic are not satisfied, want more money and attempt to get it by ruining the service they provide.
-Dude mentions the amusing irony as a jab at the insincerity of telemarketing, on a blog that deals with such subject matter.
-Commenters: RAHHHHBLAHHHBHLAHBLHHLAALLALA HURRRRRR HFOOIOOIGOIGOIO HURHIROWEOR JFODIJFOI BLALLLAL ALALLAL A LAL LALALLA JOIJFSDJFOIJSDIFJS FIOJSDOI JFPPLLL FPSIDPOJFI FOIJSODFJOSDIJF ID SJFOI JFOIDj ofisdf
While I don't work for the New York Philharmonic, I'm currently trying to sell symphony subscriptions (aka "season's tickets") for another symphony. The OP may have just purchased a single ticket for one concert, whereas the Philharmonic wanted him to agree to buy tickets for more concerts (often subscriptions work out to be cheaper than buying single tickets for 5 concerts).
This is where my alliance with the Philharmonic ends.
a) The call centre needs to check to see if there's a concert going on and what concert the OP has purchased tickets for before calling him. They perhaps should call when the season has completed.
b) The first words out of the telemarketer's mouth when the OP expressed annoyance at being called during a concert should have been "I'm sorry". Not "Really? Oh no. But your phone wasn't on, right?"
c) Where I come from, if a patron says "stop calling me", we make a note on their mark sheet, and they are no longer called. End of story.
It's a fact of life that telemarketers, solicitors, and direct mailers don't really cross check their lists. It's easier to just call or mail than to spend the effort figuring out who not to contact.
For example, I routinely get recruitment mail from all branches of the military, and requests for donations from both Democrats and Republicans. This wouldn't be a problem, except that I am not a US citizen, so I cannot join the army, nor can I contribute to a party or even registered to vote.
@Dakine: If you enjoy symphony as I do, it is still possible to go occasionally if you don't want front row, center and you make a few choices. Sure, you can go to the movies twice for the price of one symphony ticket. But if you truly enjoy the symphony, it's really not much of a sacrifice to give up two trips to the movies and replace it with only great night at the symphony. Quality over quantity. I tend to do the same thing with eating out.
@Dick.Blake: I don't know what website he used, but I always use whitepages.com and do a reverse lookup.
@NumberFiveIsAlive: @Dakine: I heard there was a different blog for those who want to learn how to maximize their welfare checks.
@Carey: Your $12 could have fed and clothed a child in Africa for almost 2 weeks. Maybe next time you'll think of the children instead of hobnobbing at the philharmonic.
@am84, Dick.Blake, 1800higgins: Looks like that was 800notes.com. Another good one is whocalled.us.
@manicsoprano: The first words out of the telemarketer's mouth when the OP expressed annoyance at being called during a concert should have been "I'm sorry". Not "Really? Oh no. But your phone wasn't on, right?"
Frankly I like the "Oh no" reaction better: it sounds spontaneous and sincere. Any telemarketer can be trained to say "I'm sorry" whenever the caller's tone increases above some threshold. Hopefully the telemarketer did apologize later in the call.
@grenyas: Before I post, I usually look to see if someone else has already voiced my opinion... I don't usually figure I'm THAT creative or original. Your post wasn't just my opinion, it was my opinion exactly, only worded better than I had planned. Thanks for that!
@Michael Belisle: You could have probably fed/clothed a couple or more children for the price of your ISP connection. Pony up!
Maybe I'm one of the only ones to pick up on the irony of being at an event where you are asked to turn off your cell phones in the name of courtesy for the performance, only to be called by the organization performing *while* they are performing.
Call me silly, but maybe, just maybe they should not call during their performance times. It is not difficult to conceive of those on their list of people having attended past performances being *at* present performance.
@mitchelwb: Thank you for restoring my faith in humanity...I hate when I say something in the first few comments and then I see ten people say the exact same thing over the next couple of hours.
so do you's think the ny philhar should keep a database of all the dates and times a person will be at their performances just to avoid maybe perhaps calling to solicit funds at the wrong time? what if the fbi or cia or whoever gets ahold of that list? isn't that an invasion of their privacy? what if they pay cash because they don't have credit cards? (because they are as evil as best buy) will they have to fill out a form or something listing their name and phone number?
@Dakine: Oh jesus, shut up already. So what if there are bigger problems in the world? If the OP was attending soldiers' funerals and complaining about this to the grieving relatives, that would be a slap in the face. Musing about it on a blog is not. Nobody was claiming this was a huge tragedy, just a minor annoyance.
@Shadowman615: Exactly. If we were to take that position, this site would have no right to exist, because I'm sure wars are of far greater import than what gets posted on the Consumerist.
















Textbook case of 'captive audience', aye?
But seriously, I doubt they check times or when you've purchased tickets, they likely just call whoever is on the list whenever it comes up