Reader Taylor had purchased wedding rings from Zales with a payment plan that allows him to make payments over the course of a year. One day, Taylor went to the store to make a payment of $160 and received his receipt for the cash transaction. A few days later, he received a call from the store manager who said that she believed that Taylor had only paid $60 and cited a surveillance video which, according to the manager, shows their sales representative counting only 3 bills. Even though Taylor was certain that he paid $160 and has a receipt to prove it, he asked to see this intriguing video, but the store manager has been giving him the run-around ever since. Taylor’s letter and our advice, inside…
Long-time reader, first-time writer. Here we go:
Hello. I’m writing to let you and others know about my experience with the jewelry company Zales. I bought both mine and my wife’s wedding rings at the store located inside Town Center Mall in Kennesaw, GA. I purchased them from an old acquaintance of mine from middle school; let’s call her Jen. Jen and I had not seen each other for at least ten years and it was great having her help us pick out rings that we wanted. She was extremely helpful in the account setup process, enrolling us in the credit program with no interest for twelve months. The total for our rings was $978.36, and allowing us to pay it over a year was very helpful. I could either pay online, or just drop by the store in the mall that I both live close to and frequent, so it was no problem. The only gripe I have is, you cannot pay by debit card in the store, with is my preferred method of payment since I rarely carry much cash on my person; you can only pay in-store by cash or personal checks. I had made three cash payments in the store without any problems.
I went to the mall on June 18th because I was close by to make my payment. I stopped by the Bank of America ATM that you have to pass on the way to Zales to withdraw the cash. I tried to withdraw $150.00 from the ATM and it gave me a message saying that I needed to enter in an amount in multiples of $20.00, so I entered $160.00 and withdrew my money in the form of eight $20 bills, declining a receipt because I am always keeping track of my bank accounts online and I always end up just throwing away the receipts anyway. I walked about twenty steps to the Zales store and paid a woman behind the counter the cash that I had never seen before. I counted the money on the counter and then set it in a pile on her side of the counter while she was pulling up my account information (I didn’t have my bill on me). She verified the information and then took the money and placed it in the register and gave me my receipt for $160. Everything seemed fine at the time…
“Jen,” my middle school peer, called my house the next day, on June 19th. I was at work at the time, so my mother called me to let me know that she called and gave me the number to call her back on. I got in touch with Jen about an hour after she called and she asked me how much I had paid on the previous day. I pulled out and checked my receipt, just to be sure, and told her $160.00. I asked her why she was wondering because I thought maybe it didn’t get put into my account because I didn’t have my bill on me. She said that there was just a monetary discrepancy in the store and that everything would be fine. Ok…
I just received a call on June 20th from the store manager, Jari (real name). She said that her and the “loss prevention people” had been reviewing the tape and that I had only paid the cashier $60. WHAT!? I told her how I had just gone to the ATM to withdraw the money, and I was 100% sure that I had paid $160 towards my ring payment. She said that while viewing the tape, the cashier only counted three bills and placed them in the same place in the register. She said that she went through all of the scenarios and that if I had paid her with a $100 bill in the mix, it would have gotten put in a different place than the $20 bills, but that the three bills still didn’t add up. I told her that I would check my Bank of America account online, just to make sure that I had withdrawn the correct amount and call her back.
I checked my account online, and of course, there was the $160 withdrawal that I had made. I also checked my Zales account online, and the $160 had been subtracted from my balance, like it should have. Infuriated, but completely under control, I headed up to the Zales to talk to her personally and take care of this, showing her my receipt for the $160 payment I had made just a few days ago. I walked her over to the place I was standing when I made the payment, showed her exactly how I had fanned the cash out on the counter, counted it, put it all together, and set it on the far side of the counter closer to the cashier, for her to take after she was finished pulling up my account.
After listening to me, she said matter-of-factly, “What happened was this. The code to tell our system that you are paying in cash is [1]. You paid her $60 and then she made a mistake by pressing the [1] button twice, which made your total $160.” When I brought up again how I had counted the money out on the counter, she said that she never saw me do it in the videos. I was with my wife at the time and she remembers me counting the money on the counter. Jari kept bringing up the fact that her cashier had only counted three bills and I showed her how I could easily count “three” bills by counting out two and then taking the rest of the stack as the last “bill.” She said that this wasn’t the case. I asked to see the video myself and she said that her loss prevention people had to be present to let me view the tape. I asked her what the next step was. She said “Well, either you will pay us the $100 or we will just add it to your account balance.” I told her that nether one of those was going to happen and demanded that I see the tape with my wife. She said that she would call me “later” to set up an appointment.
I called Jari on June 24th, to see the status of the meeting we were supposed to have, and she said, “I have contacted loss prevention, but they didn’t give me a response yet. I will call you when I hear from them.”
I am so confused by the whole situation! I’m guessing that the cashier could have pocketed the money either after closing the store or sometime during her shift. I am 100% sure that I gave her the correct amount of money because I keep a strict budget for myself and everything adds up. I had no other money in my wallet at the time of the ATM withdrawal, nor did I buy anything with “extra cash” I had in my wallet in the few days in between, and I still have no cash in my wallet. Now, the question is, WHAT CAN I DO!?
A store can’t just issue you a receipt and then days later say, “Woops! Do-over!” Hang on to that receipt, it is irrefutable evidence that you paid $160 no matter what the manager’s mysterious video may reveal. It is time to escalate this matter over the head of Jari since she doesn’t seem to realize the purpose and importance of receipts. If that doesn’t work, the next steps would be filing complaints with your state’s Attorney General’s office and the Better Business Bureau. If all else fails, take it small-claims court, we can’t see how Zales would have a legal leg on which to stand.
(Photo: Getty)






@mariospants: Hmmm…Good point! Thanks.
@Antediluvian:
Yeah, a cashier who’s planning to steal a $100 bill would never put that bill in with the $20′s. Or make a mistake.
I get that. But the OP said he didn’t pay with a c-note. He paid with 8 20s. My point is a $100 was never part of the equation by anyone’s claim, so a “Duh, $100, $50, and $10 is $160 in three bills” is not a valid argument here. If the guy I quoted had read the article, he’d have known.
That’s all I was saying.
@mariospants: That is the kind of English up with which I will not put.
@chrisjames:
hrm … doesn’t the best evidence rule only apply when someone is trying to prove the TERMS of a writing? It doesn’t sound like Zales is trying to say that the receipt says something other than that the OP paid $160.
Instead they are saying that he only paid a lesser amount, and that the receipt mistakenly showed that he paid $160. Thus OP would try to enter the receipt to show that he paid $160, and Zales would try to introduce other evidence to show that he did not.
i as well would blame either the employee or the manager. this christmas season, when i was working for best buy, one of our brilliant cashiers was pocketing the free gift cards that came with ipods when customers weren’t even aware they were getting them. how he managed to pull it off, i’m not sure, but questions got asked when he started paying for large purchases with all these gift cards. the kid wasn’t too bright and didn’t realize that we can look up the transaction that each gift card originated from…
It’s been said before, but the OP should contact the supervisor of the store manager.
The OP has no idea of this, but given that crooks never steal only once, his complaint added to a history of similar previous complaints could trigger a corporate investigation of the store and its personnel.
If that doesn’t get satifactory resolution, filing a complaint with the Attorney General’s office is a good move.
But I’ve always thought that a** h***s like this manager deserve the Consumer Investigative Unit expose on the local TV station – especially during sweeps week.
@Murph1908: (clarified previous statement)
Upon re-reading your comment, I see what you intended. Sorry for my previous comment directed to you, and please consider it instead directed at the idiot Loss Prevention person.
@BoomerFive:
That’s not really the point. Think about it – the fact that the OP knows he paid with 20s doesn’t mean the manager could have known this just from viewing the video. All the manager is claiming is that 3 bills were counted out, and that very well could amount to $160. So the fact that three bills were counted out proves absolutely nothing.
I think the OP knew he didnt pay 160. He says he had to check his receipt to see what he paid (Huh!) and check his bank accout withdrawl (huh! shouldnt he know without checking) whose slip is missing. He could only have gotten twenty’s out of the machine. The cashier made a mistake and he has the receipt to prove it. He can do one of two things be honest and admit he didnt pay 160 and perhaps save the job of the cashier, or pretend he did make the payment and see what happens. The story that he tells points in the direction of a 60 dollar payment.
What he took out of the atm proves nothing? It doesnt mean that he gave it all to the store! All the backtracking in his letter says he knows he didnt pay it. Hope he sees the video and gets caught, then it will be “oh yeah I remember now” coming from him.
@PHX602: No, it’s Diebold’s fault, since they probably made the ATM machine. ;o)
To the submitter:
I would suggest you try to recall what you were wearing that day. If the video doesn’t show you in what you were wearing and your wife is not there then it wasn’t you.
It sounds like the loss prevention mixed you up with someone else. Check the time stamp on your atm transaction. It should be before the video timestamp of you paying.
Three real possibilities here:
1) You didn’t pay the whole $160.
2) The employee pocketed the $100. (from your transaction or another and the drawer came up short)
3) Another customer short changed them.
i love the picture
Yeah, I’m getting married next year, and Zales is DEFINITELY not on my list for wedding rings!!
Has anyone suggested that the machine be audited? I worked for many years as a hotel night auditor ran across many that had glitches or programming errors and did not store information accurately. There should be an audit tape in that register and every transaction needs to be checked to see if it matches her cash in and out. I even had one machine that if you hit PAID IN FULL and the customer had a credit on their account it would issue a refund for the total amount. This resulted in having an overage at the end of the day. A mis-keyed transaction could easily cause a shortage.
@Mudpuddle
for the comment you made about the missing atm receipt…if you kindly re-read the story, OP states that he declined a receipt from the atm.
that is all.
Sounds like one of the employess i skimming the cash. Even if the tape shows three bills you got your receipt for the payment so they have to handle it internally and just ‘eat it’. I would highly recommend you pay in check from now on.
Where is this particular Zales story, anyway, so I know not to shop there? It wasn’t mentioned in the original post.
This whole story is just appalling, we all know it, and the obligatory “blame the victim” posts have been fairly minimal this time. The manager sounds extremely nasty and unfair. The guy has the receipt, end of story, even if the store’s register came up $100 short that day, do they really want to risk all the bad publicity for the sake of $100?