Lawsuit: Monster Cable Thinks You Might Confuse Mini-Golf With Overpriced Cables
Pricey cable-maker Monster is worried you might confuse a haunted house-themed mini-golf course with its popular products, so they're suing.
From News 10:
Monster Cable Products of Brisbane filed suit in Sacramento federal court this week against the owners of Monster Mini Golf in Rancho Cordova along with the Rhode Island woman who sells Monster Mini Golf franchises.
In its trademark infringement suit, Monster Cable claims the miniature golf courses "are likely to cause confusion."
Cindy Stoeckle, who with her husband Chris opened the Rancho Cordova location in March, was shocked when News10 told her about the lawsuit.
"What, are they not making money and they have to make some money off the little guys?" she asked.
The company's founder, Christina Vitagliano of Providence, Rhode Island, said she's been fighting with Monster Cable since she applied for her trademark in 2006. She said her attorney will defend the Stoeckles.
Monster Cable just loves to sue people! According to News 10 they sued Disney for Monsters, INC, the Boston Red Sox for "Monster Seats" on the big green monster, and is currently trying to keep them from calling the concession stand "Monster Concessions."
Rancho Cordova Mini Golf Course Hit with "Monster" Lawsuit [News 10]
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
Hmmm...
1) Monster Cable does not understand the "likelihood of confusion" aspect of trademark law.
2) Monster Cable has lawyers that have WAY too much time on their hands.
3) Monster cable thinks they own the word "monster" a generic term that probably doesn't even merit protection.
4) Someone at Monster is competing to be even more insane than the CEO of Overstock.com
as far as their cables go, I've had a few different types, including a component video cable that took the force of three men to push into the connector, and getting it back out, forget it. There's no getting it back out.
I always go with the cheaper brands now that still make cables designed for human use.
@EE2000: I totally get that mixed up every time I see a Monster Energy Drink in the cooler at the gas station. Who knew gas stations sold a/v cables!!
What a tool this company is...
Makes me glad I have NEVER brought a single thing from them...
Damn this makes me want to go to GoDaddy and register all the names I can think of with the word Monster in it... For shits and grins, add the word cable or something close to it just to fuck with them.
Webster should sue them for using one of their words in their dictionary...
I can see why Monster Cable would sue the mini-golf place, because they're a small, defenseless business.
And I guess I can understand why they'd sue the Red Sox, because the Red Sox should be sued as often as possible, just on general principle.
But filing a lawsuit against Disney? One of the companies that pioneered the concept of frivolous trademark lawsuits? That just seems suicidal.
Umm.. this is like patenting the word "BIRD". You can't use the word BIRD or we are going to sue you.
I bet 10% of their revenues from their heavy cable markup is probably for their legal dept. to sue it's own customers.
Thanks for bying this Monster cable for your Monster Mini Golf location, and we are going to sue you from the fees we collected from you b/ you have the word "MONSTER' in your name.
Ah, yes the lawsuit. The greatest tool of a fledgling business. Just like the Starbucks' "we copyrighted 'double-shot'" lawsuits against small-time coffee shops, this one will fail, too.
The overglorified and overpriced shielded coat hangers have run their course. Only fools, the ignorant, and the bribed (see: concert halls, stadiums, theaters, etc.) would even think of purchasing a Monster cable now.
Hell loses trademark lawsuit
HELL (AP) -- The Hell-based realm of Hades lost an appeal today against Monster Cable Products of Brisbane, California, who filed a cease and desist order against the use of the word "monster". The loss is rare for Hell, which acquires a steady stream of OEM souls as well as involuntary servitude from breach of blood contracts.
A representative for Hell's 4100 demons, ghouls, and foreign workers called Monster Cables a "patent troll" that uses the courts as a way to induce settlements. Most companies end up settling rather than go through the hassle of fighting Monster in court.
Satan, leader of Hell, said his organization was disappointed with the outcome of its legal battle. "We're disappointed but we respect the appeals court's decision. We do have it on good authority that we will have our turn against the members of this company and their legal staff after their mortal lives pass, and hence we shall bide our time."
Said a spokesman for Monster Cables, "Our company has been concerned for some time about Best Buy and Circuit City being consumer hell while also selling Monster Cables. There was too much opportunity here for brand confusion."
In a recent case involving the International Dairy Foods Association, a federal court in Wisconsin also sided in favor of Monster, finding that "monster" and "milk" both shared the letter M.
@crabbyman6: Right on...they need to contact Kurt Denke because he is "unitimidated by litigation." and he sometimes rather misses it.

























So is the manufacturer claiming that they're the only real monsters out there?