Get Half Off New Mp3 Player In Creative MP3 Player Class Action
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
That's like sending Al Capone to Alcatraz for tax evasion. How about the fact that Creative MP3 players are junk? I bought one for my son when he was in middle school. He enjoyed it for all of two months before the earplug jack went tits up.
Even if I could prove my purchase, why would I want a coupon for more junk?
@myotheralt: Yeah, 7% accounts for the marketing differences between the 1000 vs 1024 bytes per KB issue (and 1024*1024*1024 vs 1000*1000*1000 for GB). As well as the formatting, FAT tables, and all that.
EVERY device has this.
Is this for hard drive units of flash memory units. If it's for flash memory, then it's EXTRA stupid, because memory is manufactured to powers of 2, if it's, say a 2GB MP3 player (as my Zen Stone), there's actually a 2GB memory chip in there. Net usable capacity after formatting notwithstanding (1.83 gb)
Hey, I should sue!
That sounds like a great deal. However, I bought my Zen in 2002ish, and I only keep my receipts for 5 years, not 6.
I don't even have the player anymore- it started off as junk, and didn't get any better over time. So I removed the hard drive, reformatted it, and now it acts as a nice portable external drive. It's way more useful to my that way.
@Toof_75_75 said: Sad, can't get in on this one without having actually purchased a Creative MP3 Player...
---------------
Because iPods are over-hyped, over-priced pieces of crap marketed to lemmings.
I actually love my old 1GB Creative Zen Nano. It's tiny (dimensions 1.32" x 2.58" x 0.51"), lasts 18+ hrs on a single AAA battery, and has great sound quality. Granted it's capacity is getting quite small compared to current standards, but I absolutely love it for running, mowing lawn, or any activity due to its size.
I wish they made a higher capacity version that ran on AAA's, was small, and had a decent display. None of the new models meet all those criteria.
Oh good, here comes the Ipod hater patrol. Tell us how awful we are.
@rdldr1: I had an Archos Jukebox, and always swore I would never get an Ipod. Then I played around with one, and realized what crap my Archos was in comparison(always freezing, ridiculously big,etc). And the ease of Itunes made it so much sweeter.
I bought a Creative Zen Xtra way back when. Still have it, still use it. Had to replace the battery about 2 years ago, but other than that it works fine. I like the buttons on the sides so I never have to take it out of my pocket to switch songs.
Too bad I don't need anything from creative or even want anything. Maybe that 1 GB mp3 player as a gift to somebody...
Idiots i tells ya. When you format ANY hard dirve there is about 7% of the hard dirve reserved for the files system. Go into my computer on your machine, and check the hard drive capacity. Your sticker may say 60GB but will show u 55.8GB or so.
Another example is with flopyy disks. I even says it on the box 1.44MB, 1.37 with format.
These players contain specified hard dirve but after the file system and its OS takes over there is going to be ever so slight amount available to the user.
If they go after creative, why not Apple? Microsoft? Hewlet-Packard? IBM? Any device that has a hard drive in it?
It is pretty much a crap settlement ...
Too bad I don't think I'm buying a Zen in the near future - my old 30 GB Zen Xtra is STILL going strong in the possession of my younger sister (amazing what a new battery does for a player), and my current 60GB Zen Vision:M is performing admirably after two years ... too bad my mother's 1g iPod Nano died in three months. Even her current Zune is doing better.
Wait, I forgot, this is the Internet. All hail Lord Jobs, master of perfection!
@Munkeyhatecleen: You beat me to it. Yes, the 50% is only off a 1GB player. Which kind of sucks.
I got this email yesterday since I have two Creative MP3 players. Which, by the way, are not junk. They work just fine.
@ ganzhimself : I agree totally! I had one of the early Nomads, CD player sized. The thing took about 20 minutes and 50% of it's battery life just to boot!
But I bought it in the required timeframe and sold it on eBay ALSO in the required timeframe. But since I bought it in like 2002 and I have no receipt, no serial number, I'm out of the class action suit?
I'm not even with the same bank I was 6 years ago.
I think these requirements are too strict to make us have all that info 6 to 7 years later...for a COUPON of all things.
@myotheralt: "wait, 7%? Isn't that the standard difference between a marketed hard drive capacity and actual size?"
Yeah, it seems extremely odd that only one mp3-player manufacturer and only one hard drive manufacturer (Western Digital) got sued for this. Perhaps they weren't paying off the correct people?
Way to read the details there, Consumerist. A cursory reading of the summary class notice shows that this is only valid for hard-disk based players, and the 50% off is 'off the price of a new 1GB MP3 player'. So you can't get 50% off the price of a 30G player ($100+), just 50% off the price of a new 1GB player ($20ish).
I've got, and still use a 20GB Zen Touch. It's a little bulky, but the price/capacity/battery life was great when I bought it back in 2k5. I still use it all the time. Even though I've bought my wife/father/father-in-law various forms of iPods and through the years, I'm still not buying into it for myself, only b/c I just don't like them. Maybe when they put Oregon Trail on it, I'll get an iPod.
@strathmeyer: Seagate got their knuckles rapped over it a while back, too, I think.
The problem, I think, is companies got sloppy with their marketing. It used to be they'd put on the box, "800 million byte hard disk" and then in smaller print, "763 megabyte usable capacity" to cover themselves. At some point they dropped the small print and just started ignoring the long-standing computer convention of using powers of 2 (1024 bytes in a kilobyte, etc.) and started using 1000.
IMHO more companies deserve to get rapped for this one. You can't just make up your own inflated units and pretend they're standard ones.
@uberbucket: that's right. formatted capacity is about 93% physical capacity. i mean if creative was selling 1GB and you got 930MB, why are you crying about it when your flash drive has the same problem? this is stupid.
@bradite: Don't forget the two representative plaintiffs getting five grand apiece out of it, just for having the stupidity to sue over something like this. Still though, I'll gladly take a 20% off coupon. My sister just lost my Zen Vision: M due to the ineptness of Detroit Receiving Hospital, so I could use 20% off a replacement. I was quite happy with my Zen... got a 30 gig refurb from Woot on New Year's and had no issues or complaints with it.
Why in the world would I want a coupon for another one of their crappy players? I bought a Micro two years ago and got to enjoy it for maybe 6 months before the headphone jack broke. I went to the support forums and found out that they charge something of the cost of a new player to fix a widespread flaw. Screw them. That's what this lawsuit SHOULD be about.
























Sad, can't get in on this one without having actually purchased a Creative MP3 Player... :-( That's too bad!