Gateway: Free Shipping! With A $20 Handling Fee!
Reader Holland asks:
Gateway is advertising "free shipping," but you have to pay a $20 "handling charge." At least they're upfront that the free shipping isn't really free, but how can they get away with calling it free when it still costs $20?
Well, Holland, we guess they were just hoping that their potential customers weren't too bright. Ya know?
Post a comment
Comments:
@ffmariners: You do know that a ginormous handling charge defeats the purpose of "free shipping", right?
"Come on, we all know that handling is the larger cost of "shipping and handling".
And we all know that a good handling is worth the extra cost."
Really?? That is the dumbest comment I have seen in a while. The laptop is already packaged in a secure box, wehther it is shipped or picked up from a retailer. The only handling involved here is picking the laptop from the bin and putting it on the conveyor belt. End of story.
@impudence: I'm pretty sure your comment was more dumb, seeing how you apparently completely missed the sarcasm in it.
@fluiddruid: And the buyer can very well decide that.
But the presence of a handling charge does not mean the shipping is not free...
@Meisterjager: It was a veiled reference to a manual act of sexual gratification. Try some coffee, it'll help you wake up. :)
Isn't shipping usually like $50? A large portion of that actually is handling. Shipping is pretty cheap, esp. for big companies because of the fact that they get huge shipping volume discounts. HOWEVER, whoever was the brain child of this sales gimmick is an idiot.
@impudence: Who packages it in a secure box and moves pallets of it around and then puts them in their alotted warehouse space? Gateway. It's not like Best Buy is charging a handling charge here(that would be more asinine as they actually have miniscule handling charges comparitively).
@edbro: I don't understand when people say they don't pay 'x fee' when they buy 'y item.' Sure you do... they just don't highlight it and seperate out the fee. Whether it is hidden or shown up front, you are paying it.
Handling fees are BS anyway. How is the amount of handling _any_ different if I go to a brick and mortar store and they have to go get the product of a high shelf in the back?
If you have to pay employees as part of your business, that should be reflected in the price of the item, not tacked on as an extra fee in a smaller font below the price. They might as well be charging me extra "building rent fees" to cover the cost of their warehouse at that point.
When I have the handling costs brought into question on my ebay sales, I state that not only is it the materials and time to pack the item, but also the time/gas it takes for me to bring the stuff to the post office.
So in this case, the handling might be to cover the infrastructure the have set up to processes orders and get them out the door. Granted, I'd figure that'd be factored into the cost of doing business (and thus the cost of the product)...but you can't deny some handling needs to be done.
@Daniel: To me, part of ordering a computer is the specification that it is not broken. So really, to say "I prefer a non-broken computer than a broken one," miss the point.
Charging seperate fee for shipping makes sense because there is many options for shipping kinds. But charging a seperate handling fee does not make sense, because sending the customer a not-broken computer should be taken as granted.
If you buy something in a brick and mortar store all the shipping and handling is included in the displayed price. There's no additional charge because it came over from China and had to go through customs. You don't pay extra because someone has to go back to the storeroom and get it for you. Why should mail order companies be any different?
You know, no one would have batted an eye if they just charged $969.99 for the laptop with free shipping and handling.
@celticgina: Gateway charges about $50 for footling. You're better off just paying the handling fee.
Handling these days is often little more than placing an item in a box with marginal amounts (and sometimes no) packing material. It may even be done mostly by machine.
I've notice most sites that offer free shipping aren't really great deals. It's usually only one shipping method that's free and that would be whichever method is slowest and cheapest.
I guess if shipping and handling usually cost $50, then $20 just for the handling doesn't seem so bad, I guess. Maybe still a little high. It can't take but a minute for someone trained to get one ready for shipping and maybe a few bucks for box,packing materials etc...
Then I don't know how many one work packs up a day. If one guy is doing 50 laptops a day @ $20 a pop handling charge to the customer. I think that more than covers that persons payroll,benefits, materials and leaves a profit it there.
@Consumer007: It is a shipping and handling fee, they only said the shipping portion was free.
The lawsuit probably wouldn't get to the actual lawsuit before the judge dismissed it.
This is just them playing games with the pricing. They quote you a low price on the product but you can't actually buy it for that - there's some mandatory additional charges that make the final price higher.
It's very close to fraud - the company can allocate costs any way they want, but it's important that they advertise the sale price honestly.
@Bladefist: While I don't disagree that "free shipping" is ultimately paid by the consumer somewhere someway, if a laptop is, say, regularly priced at $1,000+$75 S&H and a there's a free S&H promotion, I would be paying $75 less than normal, yes? Or is that difference just a "marketing gag" and "doesn't exist"?


















The consumerist does know the difference between shipping and handling, right?