squatmart is in the business to make money and care little else about lead in your child's toys, toxic crayons, your fake jewelry as long as they saved a buck and suckered you into a purchase.

Do America a favor and never shop there. Tell squatmart You don't want their stinkin' made in China crap.

I would be so freakin' pissed if this happend to me. I'd sue them as hard and fast as I could, not because I'm sue happy, but because THIS is what lawsuits are FOR.

How come the gallery says "Kerry's Feet" while the post says "Kelly"?

Has it been almost a year already? Damn!

Wally Marty wanted to get her hooked on their $4 RX bullshit. You know... Wally Marty announces they will do 90 pills for $10, CVS is already doing it so its no big deal like Wally Marty wants you to think it is as in every thing else they do. Hmm... maybe these scarred feet are no big deal after all.

@spanktastic: Good luck with that. Like debt, Americans are, by and large, addicted to the low low prices. Very rarely do we think of the longer-term consequences -- just look at all the people that bought SUVs and continue to buy them.

@acasto: Because we fuck up sometimes. Don't you?

Wal-Mart will never willingly talk with her now. What Kelly needs to do is talk with a couple lawyers and find one to take up her case. This sounds like it could be a class-action suit.

Yet another reason to BOYCOTT Wal Mart. They don't give a damn about the customer or the health issues that have arisen from their shoddy products. Seriously, America, wake up!

I don't usually say this, but get a lawyer and fast! I hope you've consulted with a doctor and that everything turns out OK.

I've cut my Wal-Mart shopping down to less than four or five times a year now. That's pretty good.

someone remind me again...were these walmart brand flipflops? i ask because walmart is getting the heat here but i still say the makers of the flipflops is who should be answering questions. walmart just sold the thing. They were probably waiting upon the makers to issue their recall.

how come she wore these long enough for the severe cuts that occurred to occur?

@thejakeman: probably disagrees with you: RTFP! They're chemical burns, NOT cuts!

If that's what your feet look like, imagine what the 5 year old sweat shop worker in China's hands look like.

Actually I *HIGHLY* doubt these are chemical burns at all, but probably more of an allergic reaction to the strap material.

Calling them chemical burns is a little ridiculous, unless she kept them on her feet nonstop and didn't wash her feet off or anything.

lol, 5 year old sweatshop workers in China? There are no 5 year old sweatshop workers in China. There are 18 year old factory workers in China, and they might not get paid a lot, but this anti-China slander is getting out of hand.

And yes I do know what I'm talking about regarding allergies vs burns.

It's most likely a rubber allergy (kind of like how you hear about latex allergies).

@tekdemon: Even if there were 5 year old sweatshop workers, putting them out of work isn't going to make their situation any better.

Usually sun burn is on the outside of the straps.

@tekdemon: What the hell are you talking about, "no five year old sweat shop workers in China"?

Google "child workers china":

[www.google.com]

You are the worst kind of shill.

It's funny that we're really quick to condemn China's actions in concerns to human rights violations like child labor, but we have no problem at all benefiting from it as long as it doesn't happen "in our neighborhood."
For the above commenters who think China is so bad: do you think that pair of Nike's would cost the same if it wasn't for those little hands? If you're going to be vocal about China's rights violations, don't turn the other cheek when it comes to buying your clothes or just about every single fucking thing we buy here in the US. Otherwise, you just sound like a douchebag hypocrite.

@tekdemon: You need to educate yourself a bit and see what goes on in the real world. There might not be 5 year olds in the sweatshops in China, but 6,7,8,&9 year olds I am sure, and cuts? WTF? Those are burns of some sort...and I know.

@howie_in_az: SUV's are premium vehicles (when not needed for practical purposes), and as such, cost considerably more than your crappy little Hyundai -- or am I missing your point??

I purchase 80% of my clothes from US. Good old, Tom James Company.

Still working on finding more. Want to be 100% american made.

Also, use a local lady tailor for shorts and golf shirts.

I know that some of the cloth is not, but still....what are we to do?

@trujunglist: I haven't bought Nikes in the last 20 years. Does that mean I get to call you a douchebag hypocrite too?

it's actually most likely not walmart or the manufacturer's fault per se, but rather just an unfortunate coincidence. from the story and looking at the pictures, it's probably an allergic contact dermatitis. for anyone else out there who understands medicine (although if you do, you probably already know this) it's a type IV immune response (delayed type hypersensitvity) involving T-cells. so in other words, yes, an allergic reaction, but not the type that you think of from, like, a bee sting for instance (little medical lesson for ya: that's a type I hypersensitivity). the response is delayed and your body can react well past the initial insult, which was whatever she's allergic to. and yes, it can even get progressively worse because your own T cells are attacking your skin. the sandal situation is actually a classic example for dermatology instruction since it's easy to see what the cause was and it's relatively common. see shape of sandals - see the shape of lesion.

if it were truly a chemical burn, it would be an irritant dermatitis, but that would mean that anyone would have this reaction if exposed long enough, which, gauging by the low numbers afflicted is unlikely.

now, should walmart have recalled the sandals really quickly after people reported this? probably. are they at fault and should they be responsible for the damage to her feet? out of good will maybe, but again, it's just an unfortunate coincidence that someone with the susceptibility happened to pick the right (or wrong) sandal with the particular thing they are allergic to. i doubt there was anything neglectful here. it's really unfortunate and i hope she gets better.

Soooo...did she ever see a dermatologist? If the answer is no, I still, about a year later, don't care.

3 words: personal injury attorney.

She should have called one the day it happened.

Uh, if I remember correctly the woman did see a doctor right after this happened and the doctor did confirm it was some sort of burn, not an allergic reaction.

An allergic reaction does not leave your feet scarred and unable to wear shoes a year later.

This woman has been patient enough and she clearly has long lasting damage. She needs to sue.

I am sick (kinda literally) of looking at this woman's gross feet. Please, no more, Consumerist.

She has an allergic reaction to rubber, and she didn't take legal action against Wal-Mart. So WTH does she expect this site to do about it?

Ummm Tom James sucks. Custom whatever... Had a couple of dress shirts done and one didn't last two washes. I followed up and nobody wanted any part after the sale.

READ THE POST PEOPLE!! AND READ SIMILAR STORIES!! It may LOOK like an allergic reaction from the pics but it is NOT... it was VERIFIED by a DOCTOR that it is a CHEMICAL BURN!!

@thewriteguy: I've heard of people who did take legal action and got nothing.

@balthisar: I think you're missing the point - SUV's are gas guzzlers that kill both the environment and your pocketbook.

Comment on 1 Year Later: Feet Scarred From "Chemical Flip Flops," Walmart Still Not Talking @tekdemon: I can almost assure you those are not marks from an allergic reaction. I, unfortunately, am allergic to most metals and most plastics, and I have to be very choosy with flip-flops, or else my feel will end up looking like this. However, my feet heal within a week, a month at the longest from an allergy. While I can't say for sure it is a chemical burn (but it sounds like Kelly can), I can be almost positive it's not just some allergic reaction, and any kind of scars would probably have turned brown by now.

@balthisar: SUV's burn gasoline at a premium rate, while creating a "premium" carbon footprint. That's all that's "premium" about SUV's. They also increase this country's reliance on foreign oil. Yeah, oh boy! What a premium product! IMHO, ALL SUV's should be banned from the road. Imagine how much we could cut America's dependence on foreign oil overnight!!

Wow, I can remember when this story came out. That means I have been reading the Consumersit for more than a year...

Dang.

I still can't see how this is a chemical burn. If only certain people developed this condition after wearing the flipflops, then it is an allergic reaction, not a burn.

For example, if someone throws hydrochloric acid on your skin, you burn and if it gets spashed on the girl next to you, she burns too. No one is immune to that. But you wear sandals with a funky chemical composition and get a funky pattern on your feet but your friend didn't, then you are allergic.

IIRC, this is one of the first "blame the victim" threads. Also, one of the first threads to fill quickly with the "why do you still shop there" whiners.

Looks like contact dermatitis. Contact dermatitis can and does occur due to exposure to chemicals.

Even if it was a "burn"...... Who in Hades keeps wearing the farking flip-flops? The answer to that stupid question is the OP. Yep, she admitted to continue to wear the farking flip-flops after the problem started becuase she was too cheap / poor / stupid to stop wearing the offending products.

What a farking idiot.

Now myself, when I washed a particular male undergarment (jockys) in a new laundry detergent and cause contact dermatitis of my private regions I was smart enough to promptly remove the offending garment and go commando for the rest of the school day until I could visit the DR.

Maybe I am a rocket scientist, or just maybe I have more common sense than the OP.

If you put something that costs $3 on your feet - ESPECIALLY if it is from Mal-Wart - then your expectations must start pretty low, and if you are surprised that the cheap footwear messed up your feet, then Darwinian principles aren't doing their job properly.

@wildness: I'm inclined to agree but these are freaking shoes we're talking about here. For $3 I would expect them to be uncomfortable, ugly, and fall apart quickly. I would not even guess they would cause a serious skin reaction. That's just one of those things that there's no excuse for.

@wildness: Hey, don't knock $3 flip-flops! Old Navy's cheapies last me a full summer. (:

@wildness:
So at anytime you pay $3 or less you're explicitly signing an agreement that allows bodily harm?
Right, that makes sense.

Comment on 1 Year Later: Feet Scarred From "Chemical Flip Flops," Walmart Still Not Talking I'm voting allergic reaction / dermititis / plastic sensitivity. Otherwise, how can it be that out of the (presume) millions of pairs of flip flops Wal-Mart probably sold, there are reports of only 200-300 even exaggerate it to 500 "chemical burns"? How come the other millions of people weren't burned by these chemicals?

lets see clothes of ANY price should NOT cause and INJURY to a person.
Please pay attention to the capitalized words.

OH MY GOD!!! That's horrible. I would sue for negligence. That have to take responsibility for the products they sell if they can cause that kind of damage.

I followed her site for quite a while. Wal-Mart's worst actions occurred after they had over 50 cases reported to them and yet still kept it on the shelves. A voluntary recall of these daisy flip flops should have occurred ASAP but it didn't.