Round 25: Bank Of America vs Toys R' Us
This is Round 25 in our Worst Company in America contest, Bank of America vs Toys R' Us. Vote which sucks more, inside...
Here's what readers said when they nominated the two companies:
Bank of America:
"aka Band of Assholes in our family"
"Bank of America cost me hundreds of dollars in bogus fees plus the hassle of trying to straighten out their mistakes and then my time to change my bank accounts to a different bank. After I left them, they still rip me off for $3 each time I need to use one of their ATMs."
"Bank of America -what do you mean my ex can still charge my credit card?! You won't permanently close my account either?! 16.99% is NOT the lowest you can go on a credit card!"
"Between now owning Countrywide and shafting its credit card users, it's a no-brainer."
"For sheer wickedness in how it views its customers (or should I say serfs)"
"Bank of America. I am sick of being @$$ raped by their non-boa ATM fees. Sometimes, I go to areas (in the US) that have NO boas and I still get punished. I am sick of all their hidden fees. (NEVER get a savings account there.) Also, arbitrary rate increases? Please."
Toys R' Us:
"Bad prices and terrible returns policy, oh and their super rundown stores."
This is a post in our Worst Company In America 2008 series. The companies nominated for this honor were chosen by you, the readers. Keep track of all the goings on at consumerist.com/tag/worst-company-in-america/
STILL OPEN FOR VOTING:
Toshiba vs Microsoft
US Airways vs Washington Mutual
American Airlines vs Blockbuster
Time Warner Cable vs Radioshack
Wellpoint vs Charter Cable
Dell vs Home Depot
Sears vs Citibank
Wal-Mart vs TJMaxx
Mattel vs ATT
Capital One vs Video Professor
eBay/Paypal vs COX
Apple vs SallieMae
Diebold Vs Pfizer
MTV vs TransUnion
CompUSA vs DirecTV
Target vs Best Buy
Allstate vs Verizon
DeBeers vs 1800 flowers
Starbucks vs United Airlines
Exxon vs Crocs
Google Vs Sony
Ticketmaster vs Wachovia
Facebook vs The American Arbitration Association
Comcast vs Menu Foods
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
@NameGoesHere: no, its not a fair vote for Toys R us... or rather it is since they will lose to BOA...
I haven't had any problems with my BofA account and their reps have been nothing less than helpful and friendly (and they're apparently US-based; I'm hard of hearing and Indian accents are VERY hard for me to understand).
However, a bank has much more potential to cause actual harm to customers who DO have problems than a toy store does, so I voted for BofA.
I've been a Bank of America customer for about 3 years now and have not had any major issues with them at this point. But I know sooner or later they'll find thier oppurtunity to screw me, I can't wait. Is there any bank in this country (minus credit unions and that military bank everyone talks about) that isn't full of crooks? You guys have blasted every bank I know on here.
@AstroPig7: maybe BOA sent out a memo about the vote, and they all came out in force - and only 8 voted the way BOA expected ;)
I voted for Toys R Us. Their stores are shittier than the ones Target has. BoA, while vile and crappy, will win regardless if I voted for Toys R Us or not. Think about it? If I knew Toys R Us was going to win, and by fate, it was meant to win (hypothetically) then a vote for it or BoA would not matter (at least my vote) because fate would not change. Reverse that around and you can understand what my point is. Yeah, so what is BoA is an evil evil EVILEEEEE company - who cares? They're going to win this regardless. Well, not so much as regardless, cause of course if they weren't so evil, then perhaps Geoffry the Giraffe would stand a chance...but no. And that is my rant for the day. For now. At 1:09 EDT...
@plustax: Even a lot of credit unions are full of crooks and bad customer service. They are not a panacea.
Personally, I think that BoA gets blasted so often simply because a) they are a bank, and b) they are one of the biggest, most widespread consumer banks. People tend to get very pissed at any disagreement with a bank, since these disputes can often be over quite a bit of money. Probably all banks have a significant percentage of dissatisfied customers, and when you multiply that by the number of customers BoA has, that adds up to a lot of people.
So while I don't doubt that a lot of people have had big problems with BoA, I don't think they're the worst company in America. To earn that title, in my mind, you really have to stand out in providing poor customer service (like Comcast or a lot of the airlines do).
@bsalamon: I don't think you're in the extreme minority. I agree with you. You just hear about the people who have problems more because they want to talk about it. If BoA was as bad as a lot of people here say they are to everyone, then they would be dead as a company. They don't have built-in monopoly advantages like cable companies do, and almost everyone can switch to another bank without too much trouble. Thus, I can't believe BoA would be as successful as they seem to be if they treated all their customers like dirt. I think you and me are in the majority.
BoA is not just "a" bank, they're a bank with some of the least customer-friendly policies in America.
Re-opening closed accounts then charging $35 for it? That's not a courtesy, that's fraud.
The only thing that keeps B of A from winning this outright is that there are plenty of customer-friendly banking options out there, from USAA to credit unions, so B of A customers get exactly what they pay (and pay and pay and pay) for.
The illegals thing is exactly what I was going to chime in. Extending credit to them is unacceptable, and I will never do business with them because of it.
@dotyoureyes: People need to stop referring to USAA as an "option" for everyone. It's not. Same with credit unions.
Second, how is charging a $35 fee fraud? A ripoff, yes. Do you know what fraud means?
To say nothing of BofA buying MBNA, then stealthily sending their credit card customers 8 different letters, all inconspicuous, all 10pp affairs where, buried in the fine print, BofA tries to make the credit card deals even MORE screwed than they were to begin with.
Things like, "If you wouldn't like your APR to go from 9% to 32% next month, send a snailmail letter with the following 4 pieces of information to this special address within the next week." Only buried on page 4 and written in 50 words of well-neigh incomprehensible legalese. And repeated for changing ave daily balance, binding arbitration, etc.
Evil!
On a different note, I have to crack up at the posters that say, "Since nothing personally happened to me, I'm going to ignore reams of factual data and vote for EvilCorp."
Since if nothing directly impacts them while they obliviously trudge thru their pale, sad life, it obviously doesn't exist.
Jeezus - develop you empathy muscles, guys: we're humans, not cockroaches.
@dotyoureyes: I don't pay them anything for anything. Do they have high fees for some things? Yes. The solution is to not use BoA if they are going to charge you a lot of fees to do what you want. You might also want to avoid them if you tend to overdraft your account, since I hear they are pretty brutal when that happens. I don't do that, so I'm not too concerned about it. Just like I'm not too concerned about the fact that my credit cards might charge me 30% interest if I default on the account. I never pay credit card interest, so this isn't really a relevant feature of them to me.
Again, the #1 seed against the #16 seed. What's up with that? Toys R Us is a toy store. There are many like it, and you usually don't have to have an account there to buy a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles action playset. BankOfAmerica, on the other hand, is one of the most useless McBanks out there. You pay fees out the wazoo for worse than nothing, and it usually costs you money without your having done a thing wrong, and they flat-out refuse to fix it without a court-order. BofA by a landslide.
@WhiteTrashLegend, and @ferris209: Take a look at this: [consumerist.com]
From the article, according to a spokesperson from Homeland security, the program is perfectly LEGAL. "the cards are perfectly legal and comply 'fully with all banking and antiterrorism laws governing customer identification.' "
@beavis88: "Toys R Us would be lucky to win the NIT of bad companies. Bank of America gets a bye straight to the NCAA Final Four by comparison."
THIS.
@mgy: Exactly! Sometimes I write how I think - which apparently isn't comprehensible with anyone with a NORMAL HUMAN (TASTY) BRAIN like you. People say I'm weird. Am I weird?>!
My vote went to BoA because of the like 5 bucks I pay to them for ATM transactions. I fucking hate that on top of the random ATM fee, I have to pay BoA because they didn't have an ATM within like 20 miles. Fuck you BoA.
The only gripe I have with Toys R' Us is how it handled the Wii. I went there right after it was released and for some reason they had all the Wii boxes out. I'm well informed, so I didn't even bother asking if they had any, but people kept running in, grabbing up the boxes, and running to the counter only to be disappointed. They also put most of their Wiis in bundle packs, which consumers hate and Nintendo has publicly denounced as evil.
























LOL... is this even a fair vote? ;)