Man Jailed After Forgetting Case Of Soda Underneath Shopping Cart
UPDATE: This guy is a liar! He stole the Pepsi after he was past the check out, and has now admitted to making the whole story up for reporters.
Have you ever accidentally forgot to pay for some heavy item that you stowed under you shopping cart? We have, too! Unlike one Cleveland man, however, we did not go to jail for it.
From WLKY:
Tom Sturgis has a long receipt showing the $157.20 worth of two grocery carts full of groceries that he bought at a Brooklyn supermarket Saturday night. After going through the self checkout, Sturgis said he forgot a $4 case of pop under the cart.Robbing a bank? The Great Case Of Pop Robbery Of '08? Yes, I'm sure the guy's grand plan was to buy over a hundred dollars worth of groceries as a cover for his brilliant $4 pop theft.A police officer working security at the store asked to see his receipt.
"I went looking for the receipt, the pop wasn't on it and they decided to have me arrested," he said.
Sturgis was arrested on a petty theft charge.
Sturgis, who said he has never had so much as a parking ticket, found himself being led out of the store in handcuffs. He spent 11:30 p.m. until 3 a.m. in jail that night.
At home, his wife said she couldn't believe what was happening.
"It's over a case of pop," said Wendy Sturgis. "He turned around and offered to go back in and pay for it and the cop told him it's like robbing a bank, you just can't get caught robbing a bank and say, 'I'm sorry, I'll give you your money back.'"
We humbly suggest that this police officer is not very good at his job.
Post a comment
Comments:
Thing is, he clearly intended to pay. I used to work in a supermarket, and this happened frequently (not only pop, but dog food, toilet paper, etc.). It doesn't say whether he raised a fuss or not, but the it was often the case at the supermarket where I worked that we'd just direct them to the customer service desk to get the last item rung in instead of waiting in a lineup all over again.
@boss_lady: Well, the article makes it seem as though he intended to pay. We're not getting both sides of the story, really.
@ptkdude: Yes, this is important.
And let this be a lesson to all of those out there who say "just stop and show your receipt!" If this guy had NOT showed his receipt (which he did not have to do), then he wouldn't have wound up in jail.
Intent to pay is what will let him off in court. "Your Honor, I had over 90 items in two carts. I just plain forgot" Case Dismissed. If not, this will get the supermarket so much bad press if they continue pressing charges, and if they don't but the DA decides to anyway, the city will get alot of bad press. Just one "You could be fighting real crime, like armed theft or murders" and it's over.
@joemono: Who is seriously going to not show a cop his receipt?
We can argue all day long about the legality of showing a receipt, but most people are going to take the easy way out here when a pig wants to see something.
At the store near me, one cashier told me that they get dinged by secret shoppers if they forget to ask if you have anything under the cart, so I'd bet that technically the cashier was at fault too.
But, in practice, I never get asked except that one time -- the guy had just gotten the secret shopper report that day.
I sympathized with him, since I understand how easy it is to forget to ask.
I've accidentally forgotten to pay for things, too, but I've never had any problem dealing with it. If you ask they're happy enough to ring it up.
But this kind of overblown response is yet another reason why receipt checking is such a problem -- if you submit you'll get mistreated if they find ANYTHING wrong. This doesn't exactly encourage anyone to want to stop.
actually that is one of the best ways to shoplift because most people don't suspect it and if caught give you the benefit of the doubt. Trust me I've seen it numerous times working retail.
The happy birthday card inside a magazine
The 20.00 orchid with it's tag on the bottom of the plastic container placed in a 5.00 pot so the cashier rings up the pot thinking the plant goes with it
The 20lb bag of dog food carefully slit open with a ton of cold medicine placed in it.
etc. it's not always about getting everything for free but rather cutting your costs.
it could go eitherway in this case.
over $150 through the self checkout? Ugh - when I spend that much, I make a casher do the work.
Of course being arrested for that is stupid - but all the self-checkouts that I go through always ask me if there is anything on the bottom of the cart before I pay - wonder if they have that where he shopped at since a small reminder like that would have saved a lot of headaches.
@ChrisC1234:
Ah yes, the token overly-litigious commenter. Sue them for having you arrested for theft. While I think this whole thing is dumb, he did (attempt to) take the item without paying. It's not the cops job to determine his intent. The cop's job is to say "Did you pay for this?" "No..but" "*cuffs* You go to jail". While the store never should have let it get that far, they didn't do anything "Wrong" to the point that they expose themselves to a lawsuit. They lost the customer and got a lot of bad press, that's loss enough.
I just looked at the story and saw the location: BROOKLYN, Ohio.
I thought that sounded familiar, so I looked it up to be sure - and I'll be damned if it isn't the exact same town where the cop arrested the infamous Michael Righi for not showing ID after an altercation with a Best Buy receipt checker!
Who the heck is running the Brooklyn, OH PD? These guys are idiots!
@AlteredBeast: Since you're getting technical of what it's called, in reality it's called Soft Drink. But regardless it can be called pop.
I once walked past a Target check-out with a bag of bread in my hand -- I'd been carrying it around while my mom and brother grabbed everything else and just forgotten about it. /I/ was the one who realized, but it was still awkward going "... yeah, I almost walked out of the store with this, can you ring it up?"
I guess that moron would have sent my four year old to jail for 'lifting a snickers bar.
Anyone else see the irony of a cop moonlighting as a security guard. I saw a story on the news a few months ago where a man shot a security guard during a crime. The news referred to him as killing a police officer. He didn't kill a police officer, he killed a security guard.
In my opinion, this guy did not get sent to jail by a cop, but by a security guard.
As for showing a reciept, I adamantly oppose the systematic checking of receipts. However, if a security guard politely asks me if I remembered to pay for the $ in COKE (not pop, not soda) under my cart, I would be happy to show him. In reality, his asking would make me realize that I didn't pay for it.
But this moron was just on a power trip.
@Pylon83: "he did (attempt to) take the item" implies intent. If it was an accident, and there's no reason to believe otherwise, there was no intent.
@mattatwork: "I think someone might have been shoplifting" isn't probable cause in most places -- you have to be seen taking merchandise off a shelf, concealing it, then monitored til you leave the store (since you could have put it back while you were out of sight, if they don't maintain constant visual contact), and then walking out the store without paying for what you hid.
@CaptainCynic: "In my opinion, this guy did not get sent to jail by a cop, but by a security guard."
Badge? Gun? Took oath as law-enforcement officer? Yup, he's a cop.
A cop working extra duty as security is still a cop.
@Pylon83: Ahh the token commenter who makes incorrent statements about the law.
Look up your local criminal code and see how many times intent appears. It's the cop's job to determine that intent.


















You know, in some police jurisdictions, they actually disqualify you if your IQ is too high. I have a feeling that this police officer is one of the ones hired under this policy