Fertilizer prices have shot upwards in the past five years as manufacturers have been unable to keep up with demand. The demand is driven by an increase in biofuel production, and a growing appetite for red meat in developing countries. The end result is that it now costs an extra $1.00 now to get a slice from my the pizza place around the corner from me. [NYT]
Post a comment
Comments:
Makes sense. Pizza contains both grain and dairy. Grain prices have gone up due to the stupid ethanol craze, which makes flour for the dough cost more. It also raises the prices of grain for feed, which raises the price of dairy, where the cheese comes from. Also, of you go to a pizzeria that uses cornmeal on the bottom of the pizza to prevent sticking in the oven, the price of corn has really gone up, again due to the ethanol idiocy.
The solution? Given this article which scientifically proves that plants crave electrolytes, we should fertilize our fields w/Brawndo.
So where then, I ask you, is all the ethanol that's supposedly been made from all the missing corn?
I'd like for someone who's blaming ethanol for rising food prices to show me where all this dadgum ethanol is.
I don't believe you can. I think someone's being dishonest and manipulative on this topic (and I don't mean any Consumerist posters).
@BigElectricCat: LOLthenol is 15% of your gas every time you fill up, unless you're in a safehaven of sorts where shoddy Gov't policies don't mess with your gas prices (impossible).
The problem isnt just "biofuels" in general..thats a very broad class. Some biofuels are a net loss in terms of energy generated. as AstroPig7 said. If it takes 150+ gallons of fossil fuels to produce and transport corn ethanol, which itself produces less energy than other biofuels, than no one is really being green. These shortsighted policies simply endorsed corn because we have lots of it and its already heavily subsidized.
Other biofuels produce a lot more energy at a lot less cost - although not all of them can be widely grown all over the country (sugar, and what Brazil is doing with it, is a prime example).
The problem with these energy debates is people simply rush to one side or another - there are biofuels that can help and they should be part of a long term sustainable strategy but we shouldn't just go with the first one we find and then claim it will solve everything.
1) crops are grossly over-fertilized as it is. one of my friends runs a CSA that uses very minimal levels of fertilizer - mostly he relies on crop-rotation to reintroduce nutrients into the soil - & his tomatoes are fantastic!
2) production of ethanol from corn is not very efficient, but there are a variety of other methods that are incredibly more efficient & don't rely on our food supply. the question is, why aren't we using them?
that is all.
@mac-phisto: Most peoples hatred of diesel engines? Bio-diesel is good, and you can use the waste by-products of things like chicken processors. But b/c most Americans have a love affair w/ powerful engines and fast cars, they won't look at diesel. Also the fact that diesel is WAY over the price of gas now, making people feel better about using the cheaper gas is driving it.
@mac-phisto: The fields aren't over-fertilized. The problem is you just flat out need that much nitrogen to grow cereal grains to the scale demanded by our industrial food machine. The only way to create this much fertility is through artificial fixation of nitrogen (look up the Haber process and read The Omnivore's Dilemma for much more info).











Try owning a landscaping company who relies on fertilizer. Try being an ORGANIC landscaper who relies exclusively on organic fertilizers some of which are based on corn!
Some of my fert prices have doubled this year. Its awful.