Round 4: Google Vs Sony
Google is like the elephant that never forgets... and it knows all of your personal information. Do you trust it not to be "evil?" Or is Google just a nice name for "Big Brother?" Let's not forget how they bowed to Chinese government demands that Chinese users be prevented from seeing certain search results, like information about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.
Sony is a member of former Worst Company in America winner, the RIAA. When its not fake blogging, it can be found installing a rootkit on your computer and finding lots of ways to void your warranty.
This is a post in our Worst Company In America 2008 series. Keep track of all the goings on at consumerist.com/tag/worst-company-in-america/
STILL OPEN FOR VOTING: Ticketmaster vs Wachovia, Facebook vs The American Arbitration Association, Comcast vs Menu Foods
(Photo:Jeff Sanquist)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
I'll play the devils advocate. Of course the Sony rootkit already trumpts Google.
People don't realize that Google is a privacy violation waiting to happen. The more and more services you use from google, the more and more you can become a target.
Notice how some of the ads seem to track you whereever you go? It's no coincidence that searches you do trigger key words and all the google adsense affiliates will display ads.
Google these days are getting more and more into politics. Imagine the political leverage they can get knowing all the search patterns of pretty much anyone in the world, including our politicians?
I get the feeling there's an evil mastermind waiting to blossom @ google.
@mgy: First few rounds will be pretty much one-sided. It's like the playoffs, they put the lower ranking teams against the top ranking teams for quicker eliminations, and it's more likely for the top ranking team to make it to the end.
Say you have.. #1 vs. #4 and #2 vs. #3. Most likely it'll be #1 vs. #2 at the end. While if you did #1 vs. #2 and #3 vs. #4. You'll end up with #1 vs. #3 at the end.
In addition to its strident support of stupid DRM, don't forget Sony and all its foolish proprietary formats: ATRAC, memory stick, etc.
Their products are far too expensive for their value now. In the past they could get away with it because of their elegant design or functionality. Now, they're the Moto RAZR of electronics.
Luckily, there's competition out there.
@sgodun: The companies were nominated by readers, then there was a vote to determine the top 64 seeds. Google got enough votes to be included.
Gee, so few seem upset at Google's cooperation with the Chinese government to censor the web. Just so they can make money in China.
From their corporate philosophy:
4. Democracy on the web works.
6. You can make money without doing evil.
And
8. The need for information crosses all borders.
Where's the anger at their hypocrisy?
Sony in an instant. I have a PS3 from them just for the blu-ray upgradeability (I am NOT a console gamer) and they lost money on the sale because consoles are sold below cost with the expectation that you'll buy the overpriced ($60) games.
In other words, you can screw Sony by actually using their product because the alternatives will be out of date soon so Sony is, sadly, the only realistic choice at this point. Win.
Ok, this is how I see it.
Since I try not to put too much info about myself on the net (I am paranoid that way).... I figure that google doesnt have THAT much info on me. At least none that could be traced back to me specificially since I surf via a clean laptop & unsecured wifi networks that arent my own. Purchases, bill-paying, & accessing my bank accounts i leave to a different computer that is secure that is only used for those purposes. I dont use google while on THAT computer. I do my searches on the other one (mentioned earlier). Like I said... I am a bot paranoid when it comes to my privacy.
As for sony, I have been gouged & sold defective equipment by them in the past. And then told to go screw when i complained. IMO Sony is an overpriced behemoth that doesnt give a shit about its customers.
To me... at least google is usefull once used carefully (kind of like how credit cards are).
So my vote goes to sony (and being affiliated with the EVIL RIAA puts it over the top votewise).
Is it too late to ask for additional features? Maybe we could add a 'both' button. Sony is poison, sure. But Google and their 'Don't be evil' slogan is really wearing thin. Sure, free software is good, but tracking every movement I ever made on the web is not.I guess evil is in the eye of the beholder.
@axiomatic: I think this is done on purpose so that the big condenders go to the "final four". Same thing in NCAA.
@dorkins: you bring up a good point, but i don't think they are working with china to censor the internet so much as they are making concessions to provide more access than would otherwise be available. i believe the concept is to stick one's foot in the door with the hopes that one day it will open all the way.
it's an interesting matchup, nonetheless. one company seeks to control by providing unlimited access to its products & services - creating a world full of users & developers. the other seeks to control by limiting access as much as possible with proprietary formats & services - limiting production & development within their product lines & stretching the concept of IP to its very limits.
What kind of comparison is this? I know Sony's product, but what about Google? I never heard of their product. I only use it for google-ing.
I have no problem with both companies. Sony's products are expensive, but you can get other substitute products for lesser price. Quality? What's wrong with their quality?
I own many (maybe too many now that I think about it) SONY products. If I'm in the market for a product SONY sells, I'm going to buy SONY. I have never had any problems with their support. Hell last year they sent me a free wireless microphone for a camcorder that I bought from them. I might have had a problem with that rootkit stunt they pulled, but I haven't bought a CD in 10 years.
I have nothing against Google. Never had a reason to.
That said, I had to go with SONY. Because of something they did many years ago. I'm a bit surprised it isn't on their "list" of atrocities. Any of you who played EQ back in the day may remember a place called the East Commons Tunnel. A place where people gathered to buy/sell or trade wares. A place of just plain social goodness. Well for those of you who know about what I am talking about. Remember how it was all there one day and then gone the next? SONY killed it!
Oh well, if anyone needs me I'll be weeping under torch #2 on some EMU server somewhere...
@Fuzz:
And soon Google will hold all your medical records AND provide satellite tracking of your movements for law enforcement agencies and any other goon that wants to keep track of you.
I chose SONY even though I own a bunch of their shit, including a phone, battery charger, amplifier, etc. I think their products are great, but things like root kits and proprietary formats (UMD, BluRay, Memory Stick, etc.) coupled with a general sense of arrogance gave them my vote over Google. I wouldn't expect them to make it very far in the brackets, though.





























Too easy... Google gives us friggin' $10 discounts and free services.
Sony overcharges us and gives us lame excuses for their poor showing.