Facing Online Onslaught, Dealership Honors eBay Sale
The dealership that refused to honor a BMW 3 Sedan for sold on eBay for $60,000 seems to have buckled under the deluge of criticism, emails, and phone calls made by irate internetizens sympathetic to the buyer's plight. A post by buyer Ken on m3post.com says that the dealership has agreed to honor the original price. However, there will be certain "conditions," which Ken wasn't yet able to specify. Ken's story appeared in various auto forums, and on Autoblog, Consumerist, Fark, and Digg (although for some reason, it got buried even though it has 475+ diggs...dealership sockpuppets at work?). Online social justice networking is in effect.
PREVIOUSLY: BMW Dealer Refuses To Honor eBay Sale
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
"Conditions" don't sound good.
I hope he is really careful and doesn't make any agreements to a higher price or anything that would negate his end of the eBay deal.
Sellers aren't allowed to renegotiate after the sale, but the buyer isn't, either, so he really should not agree to anything that isn't in the original deal on eBay.
He should stick to demanding exactly what he was supposed to get under the original deal and nothing else.
Now everyone should call the dealership and ask what the conditions are and why the buyer should agree to them. They made the auction. They can't change the rules just because they didn't like the outcome.
That's like the Patriots saying, "Um, we won the Superbowl because, well, we get 7 points for showing up and 3 points for every pass we complete."
You can't just convert the GBP to USD. It doesn't work like that. If you go to bmwusa.com you'll see that the coupe starts around 58 while the sedan starts at about 54k. The problem is that the demand for the car is allowing dealers to mark the price way up.
@TPK:
I agree. If there were no "conditions" listed in the eBail auction, they don't have the authority to add any now. If I were the buyer, I'd simply wait for eBay's verdict and claim the car as advertised.
@InfiniTrent: Apparantly, millions of dollars will give them exceptions to what should be common sense! Idiots.
@Mollyg: "My guess is that the conditions include a gag on talking about it and a confidentiality agreement. "
Or else, what? The dealership gets the car back???
I am glad this guy is winning the deal so far (unless their conditions make it worthless).
Based on the M3 site postings it seems like this dealership is paying for the sins of autodealers of the past. Everyone has a bad/shady/scummy dealer story and this auction allowed everyone to jump in and help someone finally get back at an idiot dealer... basically the high tech version of standing out in front of the dealership with flyers.
I would have hated to be the phone receptionist at the dealer the last few days... I am sure the dealer owner finally saw the light when other salesmen started to get screwed over for time.
BTW go to the BMW of Lincoln website for gander at the dealer owner's hair do in the website promo video. Outrageous!!!
@WraithSama: Agreed. If they tried to change the terms, I'd be on the phone with a lawyer before the salesman's mouth closed.
i would not agree to any conditions if there is wording that says the sale is 'null and void' if not met. the auction is over and you won so they cannot add on conditions now. However if all they want is for him to remove the bad posts from the sites then i would just go ahead and do that. you're getting the car so it's not too much to ask. I would also do that AFTER you have the keys in your hands.
Let me guess.....
The dealership listed a SPECIFIC car on the auction site. One of the requirements of the auction site included a listing of the VIN number. Listing the car on the auction site does not require the dealer from pulling the car from public sales. Though maybe it should be, the auction site does not require exclusive selling rights to the car. The car was purchased from the dealers lot by a walk off the street customer and now the dealer can not fulfill the exact requirements of the auction.
Ooops. The dealer pays the fees to the auction site and everybody goes home pretty much happy.
And them there VIN numbers are important. The cars may be equipped identically, have the same low, low mileage and look the same from 1 or 1000 paces, but without matching VIN numbers the cars are NOT identical. If you think VIN numbers don't make a difference, try telling somebody with 000000001 as his VIN number on his 'Vette that you want to do a straight up trade with your VIN number 123456789.
@StevenJD: Umm No. Actually the dealership has the car, they just don't want to sell it to him for the winning bid price because their no-reserve auction ended too low for their taste.
I'm curious about the terms and conditions. Overall it appears that the guy has a huge advantage so it should be according to his terms.
@StevenJD: You posted this before and now posting this conspiracy theory again? Can we vote to ban certain members?
Taken directly from the journalstar.com - Lincoln, NE newspaper web site- Quoting the buyers latest info:
" They still haven't given him the car. From his last post
"Ok, here is where we are. My lawyer has been working on my behalf.
He got the dealership to remove two conditions Fil Catania tried to impose on the deal on Monday. The first condition was that I agree not to sell the car for 2 years. They agreed (through their corporate counsel in Arizona) to drop that one. The second condition was that I agree to confidentiality and that I do something to stop the press from contacting the dealership and say something nice about the dealership. We got that one dropped, too.
I was told to arrange to make the deposit with Fil Catania at the dealership today (and was given a 4 hour deadline). To my dismay, Fil Cataniam, the GM, used my call as an opportunity to berate me, telling me CSNBC, etc.,. etc., were calling the dealership again. In my call to him, he also refused to take my credit card! In essence, he has rejected the deal corporate counsel for the parent company had worked out with my lawyer last night.
So I am ceasing communication with the dealer for now. My lawyer drafted the letter that appears below (he has dealt with Mr. Herbert Klein, general counsel for BMW NA in the past), which he faxed earlier today to BMW NA..
Also, other dealerships have been calling me, offering not only support, but greart deals on M3s! As much as I would love to take one of them, I don't know tif they are real offers or not, and I simply want BMW of Lincoln to live up to its obligations to me.
I would ask that no one call the dealership or BMW NA about this, but just wait and see what happens next. I know my lawyer is preparing a lawsuit, and if we have to file it, I will post further information here. It will also be interesting to see if BMW NA, now that it has been "officially" notified, does anything about this. This will be a good object lesson for all of us about how a car company stands up for its customers, don't you think?"
"




















Yeah, conditions! Probably like buying useless extended warantees, rustproofing, and floormats until it equals the price they wanted.