If you like spinach you might not want to read a new report from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform called “FDA and Fresh Spinach Safety.”
After a deadly outbreak of E. coli 0157:H7 in September 2006, the committee examined the Food and Drug Administration’s efforts to protect the safety of packaged fresh spinach. What they found wasn’t pretty.
From the report:
Packaged fresh spinach facilities were inspected only once every 2.4 years, less than half of FDA’s stated goals. Frequent inspections are the cornerstone to the current safeguards for fresh produce and adequate resources are required for frequent inspections. FDA’s performance goals state that 95% of high risk facilities like packaged fresh spinach facilities should be inspected at least once yearly. Over a seven-year period, FDA provided 199 inspection reports for 67 packaged fresh spinach facilities. This translates to an inspection rate of about one inspection of each facility every 2.4 years, less than half of FDA’s stated goal.
FDA observed objectionable conditions during 47% of the packaged fresh spinach facility inspections. Of the 199 inspections reviewed, 93 documented “objectionable conditions,” the most common of which involved plant sanitation, plant construction, and worker sanitation. For example, more than 60% of the inspections with “objectionable conditions” revealed problems related to facility sanitation, such as inadequate restroom cleanliness or accumulations of litter.
Despite observing objectionable conditions in packaged fresh spinach facilities, FDA took no meaningful enforcement action. FDA did not refer any of these inspections with objectionable conditions for further action by its own enforcement authorities. In one case, FDA did refer one inspection to the state for further action. FDA did not issue warning letters or pursue more aggressive steps such as seizures or injunctions.
FDA overlooked repeated violations. In 38 cases, FDA observed repeated violations by packaged fresh spinach facilities but did nothing to force correction. Instead of taking enforcement action, FDA continued to request voluntary compliance after recording violations at each inspection. 14 of these repeat requests for voluntary compliance were for precisely the same violations.
The report also revealed that the FDA does no testing of fields where spinach is grown, despite the fact that this is where the contamination likely comes from.
The California Department of Health Services and the FDA performed a joint investigation into the causes of the 2006 spinach outbreak and found that the outbreak probably did not originate in the facilities that are inspected by FDA. Instead, the problem began outside the plants and most likely was due to contamination of the water outside of the plant by cattle feces, pig feces, or river water. FDA does not routinely inspect the fields except in outbreak investigations. In fact, none of the 199 Establishment Inspection Reports reviewed by Committee staff indicated that any observations of field conditions had taken place.
The report concluded that the FDA is essentially useless: It appears that FDA is inspecting high-risk facilities infrequently, failing to take vigorous enforcement action when it does inspect and identify violations, and not even inspecting the most probable sources of many outbreaks.
Might want to think twice about fresh spinach.
FDA and Fresh Spinach Safety (PDF) [US House Of Representatives via Consumer Reports]
(Photo:jeffturner)
More From Consumerist
-
Kroger Recalls Spinach In 15 States Because No One Wants A Listeria Salad
-
FDA Proposes New Food Safety Rules In Wake Of Peanut & Cantaloupe Contamination
-
Two London Residents Find Dead Frogs In Their Tesco Spinach
-
DiGiorno And California Pizza Kitchen Pizzas Recalled Because Plastic Fragments Are Not Desired Toppings
-
U.S. Officials Shut Down Unsafe Bus Operators From New York To Florida
This story is actually pretty inaccurate. The FDA and USDA have a joint responsibility to ensure the safety of leafy greens. There’s a research project underway at CFSAN to understand how the E. coli survive the chlorine wash that the spinach gets at the processing facility. At the moment it’s not well known if/how the bacteria is absorbed into the leaves. (I’m actually working on that project.) At the project’s conclusion hopefully we’ll know how to test the wash water such that low levels of E. coli can be detected. In this way the FDA can move toward doing what it does best – issuing guidelines and regulations to make sure these dirty spinach facilities can document the safety of their product.
The FDA doesn’t have many inspectors (especially compared to the USDA) and their inspectors don’t have much power.
Oh, and washing your produce in soapy water won’t do jack shit to kill 0157:H7 in just a few minutes. I’m a microbiologist so feel free not to argue with me on that.
@Toof_75_75: To make sure I understand what you’re getting at- you’re in favor of eliminating any/all safety inspection agencies for the safety of food, drugs, consumer products, etc. because they cost too much? Or do you view the current system as ideal? Since you seem to have have a firm grasp on this, please let me know the FDA budget for food safety compared to the overall budget. I’m sure you researched that that before starting the liberal-bashing about money growing on trees.
FYI: $1.95 billion/ Total Budget 2.7 Trillion. So it 0.0007 of our budget.
To be intellecutally consistent, I assume you have the same attitude about the Iraq war, the huge tax breaks we provided oil companies makeing record profits, and the low interest loans we provide to banks?
So you think that spending say 0.001 of our budget to have safer food is communist?
If so, using your logic, lots and lots of people will have to get sick and die in order for us to know which companies produce safe products. Delmonte spinach kills people, so I’ll have to try Fresh Express. Maybe they don’t.
Maybe you two should take your party line talking point war to a convention of people who like party line talking point wars.
@Toof_75_75:
[en.wikipedia.org]
[www.update.uu.se]
[www.infidels.org]
@Toof_75_75: It amuses me how, during Bush’s first term, we were told how he was a steely-eyed conservative and possibly the second coming of Ronald Reagan. Now that he’s unpopular, conservatives have kicked him out of the club.
Also, if Canada’s health care system is such a disaster, why is their life expectancy higher than ours?
@Orv: I laugh every time someone is all “OMG socialist medicine!”, or my favorite, something about the United States having the best healthcare system in the world. Pretty much every industrialized nation with singple-payer or otherwise government-funded healthcare has longer life expectancy and lower amenable death rates (alas, the communist haven that is Cuba ranks one spot behind the United States – foiled again!).
Granted, you never want to compare apples and oranges, but the way national healthcare is anathema to wingnuts, you’d think Germans and Swedes are wasting away in third world hospitals, or paying a larger percentage of their GNP for care.