Australian TV Investigates, Uncovers Pattern Of Abuse At "Rude Feedback" Restaurant
Apparently, the email has caused such an outpouring of similar customer service stories that the restaurant is actually closed.
Today-Tonight interviewed Lorraine herself and here's what she had to say:
I've never ever even heard of somebody responding to customer feedback like that before.The report also interviews another customer who says the owner sent the cops after her for leaving without paying her bill. (She'd paid it, of course.) The rude email-sending-owner of the restaurant has now closed the place because of all the "bad publicity." He told the reporter via phone that he's apologized, but Lorraine says she never got that email.I laughed at it at first, but then I was sort of in shock that someone could be so rude....
By the next day it had been posted on the Consumerist.com and two weeks later— I don't know how many people have seen it but I'm getting emails every day."
Another show, A Current Affair, charged into the restaurant and demanded an apology for Lorraine. The owner told them that the email was meant for a relative. "Do you have a relative with the name Lorraine?" the reporter asked. "No!" said the owner. He then told them that he's going to "take the matter to the courts because the loss of sales we've had is just unbearable."
Today Tonight (Thanks, Amelie!)
A Current Affair
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
I like how the restaurant's response seems to be "well, we're totally screwed because of this so we're going to the courts!" Not sure about Australian law so who knows what theory applies there.
You would think they would simply apologize to the woman, invite her back to the restaurant with a lot of fanfare and try and salvage some positive PR out of the whole thing.
Another show, A Current Affair, charged into the restaurant and demanded an apology for Lorraine. The owner told them that the email was meant for a relative. "Do you have a relative with the name Lorraine?" the reporter asked. "No!" said the owner.
1) Then why does the e-mail say, "Dear Lorraine"?
2) If sending it was really a mistake then why not apologize?
3) How can they sue if nobody's lied about what happened?
@Copper: I don't care how good the food is. There's too many excellent restaurants around here to tolerate their bullshit. Seriously, chasing customers out onto the Drag because they didn't tip enough in your eyes? Place needs to go away, asap. Please, if you love Austin, don't eat there.
@Rectilinear Propagation:
Can't be sued (successfully)for telling the truth no matter how much harm it caused. She's perfectly fine with standing out front and handing out copies of the email, etc.
(Sigh). Folks, this happened in another country. While yes, in the United States truth is a defense to defamation suits, that's not always the case in other places. No idea about Australia, and I don't feeling like looking it up.
Regardless of the truth, maliciously doing things to hurt someone's business is usually frowned upon (as handing out copies of the e-mail to "get back at them") might be considered. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that's what happened, and this woman seems amazingly polite and well-intentioned in any event, given the circumstances.
Fine, I'll do what my mamma told me and look it up myself.
Also, Wikipedia is awesome: [en.wikipedia.org]
Allowable defenses are justification (the truth of the statement), fair comment (whether statement was a view that a reasonable person could have held), and privilege (whether the statements were made in Parliament or in court, or whether they were fair reports of allegations in the public interest). An offer of amends is a barrier to litigation. A defamatory statement is presumed to be false unless the defendant can prove its truth.
If this is the part of Australian law that follows English law then Justification should work for her.
@Rectilinear Propagation: As a source for legal research, try not to use Wikipedia. Trust me. Use a legal source to make your point. Using Wikipedia for research purposes is very weak.
@enm4r: Oh yes, the Weiner Circle on Clark Street in Chicago, I remember that place well. At 2 in the morning what those girls working behind the counter there would say could make the most foul-mouthed sailor blush. I couldn't imagine the email you'd get back from them if you said something about their service.
@Javert: That's sort of a generalization. There are a bunch of instances I can think of off the top of my head where Wikipedia has been more accurate than the Encyclopedia Britannica.
@kc2idf: you beat me. gordon ramsey is amazing!
ok aussies, here is a quick lesson on spanish... to pronounce jimenez, the "j" is soft.. you pronounce it "h". so you'd really say, "hee-men-ez." it was bugging me.
@redhelix: may be so but wikipedia isn't from purely scholarly sources. my professors would strangle me if i quoted from wikipedia. actually they'd strangle me if i used an encyclopedia in general unless i was writing about that encyclopedia.
@arch05: Agreed. I used to go there in my first ignorant couple years at UT, until the bad customer service from the family who owns it drove me away. On my second or third visit there, I was with friends finishing up our dinners and asked for the bill. We asked if it could be split, and the server pointed at the menu and said very rudely that it was printed on there that they do not split checks. We apologized for not noticing it on the menu (which was like, in fine print, on the back of the menu)and the server dashed off to tell on us I guess, even though we were about to pay for the bill. The owner (the patriarch of this Thai family)came out and proceeded to yell at us! He then made us line up in a single line, like schoolchildren, to pay and ended up splitting the check, but all the while, he was muttering something in Thai every time each of us came up to the counter (and I'm sure it wasn't anything pleasant). Extremely rude and unacceptable.
UT students get treated like shit at Madam Mam's, even though we make up his base clientele on the Drag location.
Never again.
Plus it's really not THAT great, there are better Thai restaurants in Austin with better service (like Thai Passion on Congress and 7th).
today tonight (where the first vid is from) is considered to be probally the biggest piece of shit on TV. A current affair isn't much better. i live in the same city as the resturant in question and we have so many good resturants bad ones get smashed.
BTW Truth is a justifiable defense in defamation proceedings here.
@pigeonpenelope Aussies have a hard time pronouncing most "foreign" words. They mispronounce fete as "fate" and not "feh-t" and my favourite is Junta they say Jun-tuh and not the h for j e.g. Hoon-tah. I live in Australia now and I asked my f-i-l about this and he says that Aussies have the right to pronounce the words they way they want to?!
Service is Australia is not as good as service in U.S. restaurants. Plain and simple when you are paid $2.50 / hour (or whatever it is now) plus tips you try harder. Most wait staff here get something akin to $10+/hr. Tips are not expected but I always leave a tip for the wait staff if the service is better than expected.
This whole thing is so funny and shows the power of the Internet and the power of the consumer. Go Consumerist!!!
@arch05: Didn't realize there were other Austinites in here. Madam Mam's is gross anyways. I make it a rule to not eat anywhere on the Drag. Common people.
Isn't the defamatory statement by the owner himself basically saying to fuck off? How would the consumer be responsible for that? If anything, that statement is far more damning than a letter by the consumer voicing her concerns over the customer service, provided that it didn't use inflammatory statements or language.
I remember the first time I went into Weiner Circle with some friends who were in the know because they had been living there for a while and the bitches started instantly making fun of me. I was like WTF bitches? and walked out all angry and hurt, but then one of them came around from the back and explained, while my friends watched and laughed. They stiffed me a dollar or so, saying it was their tip. I graphically described how they could easily earn another one.
The cheese fries were good.
@soylent3oz: I totally disagree. At least in Melbourne, I found service to be better than in most of the US.
I've never been to the drag location of Madam Mam's -- but have been very fond of the location on 290 just off 360; good food (though the best yellow curry I've had is still in Seattle), and I've never seen the service be actively poor. Then again, maybe because it's because I typically go in with coworkers who look less broke than I do.
















Good. Fuck em. There's an asian restaurant around here (Madam Mam's) where the servers will chase you out onto the street and berate you if you tip less that 15%. I wish this same thing would happen to them.