Companies are paying $90,000 per second tonight to get their products before our recession-fearing eyes, and they plan to get their money’s worth. Tonight’s advertisers will use an array of tactics designed with one purpose: motivating us to buy their products.
The Super Bowl is the advertiser’s carpet-bombing run. 140 million Americans—almost half the country—tune into the game at some point. Advertisers expect a massive crowd, and we don’t disappoint. Viewership has remained stable since the Reagan era:
But the cost of the average 30-second slot has skyrocketed to over $2.7 million, almost $90,000 per second.
Last year advertisers paid $2.5 million per slot, and we wouldn’t be surprised to see prices rise to over $3 million next year, vastly outpacing inflation. Advertisers willingly drain their bank accounts because they are able to squeeze value from their investment, which is why Fox sold all but ten ad slots by October.
Advertisers are increasingly using their Super Bowl advertisements to drive integrated ad campaigns that send traffic to their websites or other venues. The goal isn’t to micro-target existing demographics, but to use kitschy gimmicks focusing on brands or products to reel in a broader swath of people.
The prize is what Pete Blackshaw of Nielsen calls “monday morning chatterbacking,” a phrase that makes us want to slit our wrists with a Hello Kitty butter knife. Still, traffic to advertiser’s websites does rise by 50% the day after the game. This year, Fox is trying to drum up added synergy with fellow News Corp property MySpace. Advertisers who buy Super Bowl slots have the option of buying complementing ads—quizzes, trivia, junk like that—on MySpace, which Fox will promote during the game.
Super Bowl ads try to pass themselves off as entertainment. YouTube will highlight cutesy ads, and people will treat them as fresh content. Over a third of us watch the game just for the ads, and may even keep an eye open for one or two in particular. That’s fine. Just remember that you are watching advertising. The goal is not to entertain, but to get you to spend.
Super Bowl 2008 [Ad Age]
(Photo: monstershaq2000)
More From Consumerist
-
You Don’t Need The Perfect Tortilla Pan. No One Does.
-
What Is This “Football” You Speak Of? Survey Says 91% Of Consumers Excited For Super Bowl Ads
-
It’ll Cost Companies A Pretty Penny To Run A Super Bowl Ad This Year At A Record $4 Million
-
E-Trade's Creepy Spokes-Babies Aren't Going Away
-
Best Buy Banking On Amy Poehler To Break Its Super Bowl Ad Losing Streak
@savdavid: Sounds to me like somebody was always the last to be picked. Poor little guy.
@savdavid: So I’m stupid because I enjoy watching a sport based in strategy involving a team of grown men devising ways of penetrating the other team’s defense (obvious innuendo aside)? I guess that just makes you an asshole…
On a related note, I enjoyed some of the commercials. I also do not have any desire for a bud light, a new Hyundai, or a view of godaddy.com. They are entertaining, but don’t create an irresistable impulse.
Due to the timing of this article we’re getting an extremely lopsided view of the Super Bowl and its commercials. I personally like (not love) both. With the commercials being almost as much of a draw as the game the only problem I face is choosing when to take a bathroom break. Sometimes I’ll sacrifice rooting for my team to score just so we won’t have to go into overtime. My bladder can’t take it!
I really can’t say I’ve ever picked a product because of its commercial. I think it’s more general exposure than actual influence. Maybe. Perhaps there are dalmation lovers out there right now that suddenly have an urge for a bud light.
@TinkishDelight:
PS that is about all I absorbed from commercials tonight. A Dalmatian/Clydesdale high five and Naomi Campbell’s fantastic legs. So much for that 30 billion per second!
I usually am able to ignore advertising, but I gotta say that the Thanksgiving Day parade Coke commercial made me want to buy a bottle.
I hate everyone.
I love football; the last game of the year on any level makes me sad.
This was a very good one, btw. Best since the 2000 SB when the Rams beat the Titans on the last play , one yard short (“The Tackle”).
Doh! Well, Marge, what’s for dinner? KrustyBurgers and Duff beer? Great! When this damn game is over we can get back on the air!
Hmm… So, ads are designed in such a way so people buy? Really? Are you sure? Hmm… Interesting…
@savdavid: Gosh, I’m sorry, I just like taking some time out from composing symphonies and curing cancer to do something that doesn’t require 100% of my brainpower.
“Super Bowl Ads Are Designed To Fuel Mindless Buying”
Without having to read beyond this mindless headline, please explain to me why any kind of advertising is designed to do anything else.
@CurbRunner “Super Bowl Ads Are Designed To Fuel Mindless Buying”
Without having to read beyond this mindless headline, please explain to me why any kind of advertising is designed to do anything else.
I’ll bite. Take a look at the oil company ads that claim they’re looking out for the world, or the Phillip Morris anti-smoking ads, or any other PR-related commercial for that matter. It’s not always about selling a product, but bolstering a brand image or conveying some other message unrelated to the sale of a product or service.
Not that I disagree that this headline is a bit obvious… but since you asked…
@Elviswasntmyhero: Unfortuanately, the Declaration of Independence only provided for “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness”. THe NFL only promises you get to watch the Super Bowl at authorized venues, which does not include you the liberty to the pursuit of happines to watch it on a 56″-plus screen at your church. Bummer.
I don’t recall a health insurance company being advertized on the Super Bowl either. Not that I have every walked into a health insurance company in order to receive health care.
Also, not to be pedantic about it, but the US declared Independence in 1776, so it’s really Day #84,495 without a single payer health insurance program. Or Day #15,330 where Super Bowl audiences did not have a single payer health insurance program.
And when did Tom Petty grow that beard?
It seems to me that the advertisers themselves are doing more than a bit of mindless buying. Three mill just to air three min. of mindless babble. We all have spent our lives being told that we want this or that. Our real wants, of course, are never touched, except as hooks to get us to buy things we really don’t want or need. A good Bugs Bunny cartoon does more for us than all the adds in the world, and are a bit cheaper to boot.
The ads weren’t all that great this year.
Personally I have no interest in the commercials OR the super bowl. I slept through the whole thing (I work nights).
@Tracy Ham and Eggs as played by Walter Mondale:
Astute question. I’m reminded of that scene in “The Matrix” when Morpheus offers up his famous red and blue horse pills and says “This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill – the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill – you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.”
Put another way, what does the prospect of continuing to suffer under the morass of a corporate-controlled health care “system” have to do with consumers on a day when most of them will be mindlessly distracted, trained like Pavlovian animals to salivate on cue and sedated with junk food?
Hmmmmm.
“The immediate goal is to make sure there are more people on private insurance plans. I mean, people have access to health care in America. After all, you just go to an emergency room.”
–George W. Bush
i’m studying abroad in london and while they showed the game on bbc two, there were no commercials!! i guess it makes sense because it wasn’t fox airing the show here, but there was literally a british man talking about the game during all of the commercial breaks. he also talked through part of hte half-time snow.
not gonna lie, i was hoping to see some commercials.
@Elviswasntmyhero:
Elvis: I think you need to learn the difference between a “right” and an “entitlement”. Rights are conferred by God, as in the right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness. Rights are yours because they confer no obligation on another to provide it. You have a right to free speech: but I dont have to provide you with a microphone, amplifier or podium. You have a right to life: but that confers no obligation on me (or anyone) to provide you with a new heart or kidney.
Entitlements are bestowed by Government. They DO confer an obligation on another to be provided. You may have a job in our country, but if you lose it you are (most cases)entitled to unemployment. You may be entitled to welfare or other benefits…but that confers an obligation on everyone else to pay into those systems to make it possible.
You do NOT have a RIGHT to universal healthcare. That confers an obligation on everyone else to pay for it. Get a job with benefits! Create some new product or service and earn the money to pay for healthcare YOURSELF! Don’t expect the rest of us, who are self-sufficient in that respect, to pay for YOUR healthcare.
@savdavid: hey, I know you. I used to beat you up in high school.
I thought the term “Super Bowl” was copyrighted by the NFL. I don’t think this is “fair use” if we’re going to sit here and badmouth the advertisers.
Because when we badmouth the advertisers, aren’t we badmouthing the consumers who support them and ultimately create them?
And if we’re badmouthing the consumers, aren’t we badmouthing the entire country?
I for one am not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America!
GENTLEMEN!!!
[Shuts off computer and goes off to work, humming the "Battle Hymn of the Republic"]
@Elviswasntmyhero:
Ok Elvis, riddle me this:
What’s your solution to Healthcare?
How would you set it up so that it is fair across the board ?
Who’s going to pay for it (other than “the rich” ™)?
@Elviswasntmyhero: Off-topic.
Thanks, Mr. Romero.
No seriously, companies use advertisement to make us buy stuff?
I am also fairly sure that Pete Blackshaw of Nielsen uses the term “synergy” at least two times a week…
@TechnoDestructo: I started going out of my way to buy Dove products over competing brands after they started their “campaign for real beauty”. Yes, I know, their parent company owns Axe – a company that runs advertisements as a polar opposite to Dove’s – but I feel like something is better than nothing, and I’d like to support their efforts in the hopes that an overwhelmingly positive response would result in other advertising reflecting the same ideas.
It didn’t feel to me that the ad companies really tried this year. Pretty pedestrian stuff. A few nice ones but otherwise same ole crap.
Bud Light. Suck One!
@danisaikou: Dove is still doing good. Women want real beauty, women SHOULD feel beautiful about themselves. Without all that air-brushing and anorexic models. So support their efforts.
Men want to foolishly believe that some spray product will be make them irrestistable to women. Or that beer will make them irrestistable. Or that car. So please, continue to buy Dove products, at least for the ego’s of men everywhere.
This must be the mom-telling-you-to-look-both-ways-when-you-cross-the-street brand of consumer advocacy.
Aren’t ALL ads designed to promote mindless spending?
this just in: advertising has been found to be designed to sell stuff! film at 11!
@Front_Towards_Enemy:
Single-payer.
[www.grahamazon.com]
@Ben Popken:
Onward then.
I remember the Budwiser commercials. I really liked the Hank (Training) commercial.
PS: I don’t drink beer.
PSS: Were there other commercials? I don’t remember them. Must have been a waste of $ doing the commercials if I don’t remember them the next day.