TV Star Includes Bank Account In Editorial Saying Identity Theft Is No Big Deal, Gets Defrauded
Jeremy Clarkson, a British TV star, wrote an editorial describing privacy activism as "palaver," and just to prove how safe we all are, included his bank account number. Soon afterwards someone snagged £500 from the Top Gear host's account. "I was wrong and I have been punished for my mistake," the presenter later told reporters. Needless to say, you should never share your bank account information with anyone who doesn't need it, for instance, millions of faceless readers.
Clarkson stung by fraud stunt [Guardian Unlimited via BoingBoing]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
@msb2:
How is this a Darwin Award nominee? Yes he was dumb, but its not like he was playing with fire or something to eradicate him from the human population...
He's in the UK. There is something here called the Direct Debit Guarantee that guarantees any fraudulent debits of this sort will be immediately set right by the bank.
It's a good thing too, since your bank account information is on all of your cheques (they spell it funny here) and also given to anyone you send money to.
@shan6:
That is the lifelock nimrod. I too wonder if his SS is being used by illegal immigrants now...
@MonkeySeeMonkeyDo: Uhmmm, you do realize that JC *is* Top Gear, right ? The other presenters are hangers-on and follow his lead. There's probably a few million fans who would also disagree with your opinion, entitled as you are to have it.
@turbowagon: Even if people are fans of his show, I could see people saying he has questionable judgment.
Haven't people been seriously injured on his show?
@swalve: um...they proved their point right? it doesn't matter who it was. You're probably right and that is why it was only 500 pounds and not more.
This reminds me of the CEO of LifeLock (Todd Davis) and his commercial for the company. He believes in his business so much that he has plastered his SSN on their advertisements. (His SSN is: 457-55-5462 and his website and how his business works is: [www.lifelock.com] )
Hmmm -- last week the WSJ had an ad for some privacy service which included the ss # of the president of the company, saying "this is how good our service is. I can publish my actual Social Security number and not be concerned." Wonder how that will turn out? (Wish I remembered the name of the company; anyone know?)
@MonkeySeeMonkeyDo: Ditto - can't stand Top Gear because of him. I also cring whenever he shows up on QI.
The thing about Jeremy "Jezza" Clarkson is that he's a loud, impatient Britt with a dicky hip, a busted back, a lead foot and the tendency to drive cars while yelling "POOWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRR!!!" He's an egotistical adrenaline junkie, who believes the best thing to quit smoking is to drive a Koenesegg CCX (900 bhp on biofuel) and that the 254 MPH top speed of the Bugatti Veyron is the best out there because you can do it in the comfortable lap of luxury.
Of course, that's not to say he has his faults that he does own up to. This is one of many. Unfortunately for him, it took 500 quid to do it -- a donation to a Diabetes center.
Anyway, if you're intrested in Top Gear, there's three sites. BBC's own BBC 2 Top Gear site (www.bbc.co.uk/topgear), BBC Magazines' Top Gear (www.topgear.com), and the Final Gear fansite (www.finalgear.com).
I'd put Clarkson up there with Hunter S. Thompson or Edward Abbey. He's not afraid to hang his ass out a bit and speak his mind.
Good on 'em.
I Tivo Top Gear and love it. It's one of the best shows on TV. They don't take themselves too seriously, take the piss out of cars and call a spade a spade.
You couldn't do that in Amerika. Everyone is too afraid to bite the hand that feeds them.
@MSB2: The Darwin Awards are given to members of society that remove themselves from the gene pool. Usually this happens through death, but the nominee doesn't necessarily have to die.
I think a lot of people (mostly Digg users) think that the Darwin Awards are simply awards for stupidity. They're not.
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse has a good FAQ on SSN and problems that arise (and how to deal with them): [www.privacyrights.org]
The link to state law is also particularly interesting. [www.gao.gov]
@grouse:
I don't know how well that applies when you broadcast your information to the world like an idiot.
@shan6: There are a few "demo" SSNs used for such purposes as well as the 555 telephone exchange that's used for phone numbers shown in TV/movies/books. There are a few 555 numbers that actually work like the universal 555-1212 information number, but mostly they're all nonfunctional. There are also the "reserved" demo domains example.[com|net|org].
@swalve:
"And who says it wasn't some kind of privacy advocate who did it, just to prove their point? This story in meaningless."
What that would prove is that it's easy enough to do.
clarkson is a god among men. He does stupid things all the time, and usually acknowledges the stupidity of them (driving through mississippi in an 80s iroc-z with 'nascar is rubbish' painted on it comes to mind).
Watch the show, you'll understand.
For the record, he was voted the 4th funniest person in the history of Britain.
@Recury: But after how long? He lost, I would assume, a very small portion of his savings. But what about someone who loses everything and has things going on in their life that need to be paid for?
@MonkeySeeMonkeyDo: Oh, please let this be in Stephen's next "Dork Talk" column. Or on the next series of QI.
























LOL, moron...