Starbucks "Skinny" Drinks apparently taste about how you'd expect them to taste. We've never understood the appeal of paying the same amount of money for a large drink that doesn't taste as good. Why not just buy a smaller size of the good tasting drink? We'll never understand. [Chicago Tribune via Starbucks Gossip]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In ornare magna et est porta et mattis lorem tristique. Mauris ultricies tortor a augue eleifend Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In ornare magna et est porta et mattis lorem tristique. Mauris ultricies tortor a augue eleifendLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In ornare magna et est porta et mattis lorem tristique. Mauris ultricies tortor a augue eleifend
Post a comment
Comments:
@CumaeanSibyl: The best thing to do, imho, is to get a short drink with a double shot of espresso...same amount of caffeine, and still tasty, but cheaper overall.
"Why not just buy a smaller size of the good tasting drink? We'll never understand."
When I was in my 20s, there was a wildly popular "chick restaurant" in town whose menu consisted of salads, diet drinks, and ice cream sundaes. The women I asked said it was a way to watch your calories and still get dessert. All the guys in our crowd would go up the street, get meat and potatoes and veggies, and skip dessert. It seemed to be mutually incomprehensible.
I like to order an Americano with an extra shot, and chocolate syrup. It still gets you some of the mocha vibe, but it has less calories due to the lack of milk (I don't like milk anyway), its stronger due to the extra shot, and its still way cheaper than a regular mocha. I call it the ghetto mocha. Although, I usually just drink some coffee I made myself mixed with hot chocolate. Thats good... and cheap!
@supercheap: Okay, that makes sense. I'm not one of those "fancy coffee is for losers" people, but I am one of those people who feels really weird asking for special things at a restaurant, even if that's their whole business. This is why I don't go to Starbucks.
(that and their coffee totally tastes burnt, there I said it hahahaha)
I just finished looking at a website that sells $230,000 stereo speakers, so apparently no matter how stupid, ridiculous, or expensive something is, there's somebody out there who's willing to pay money for it.
"Skinny" really doesn't really sound like a good marketing word...you would have thought they would have just gone with "Light" or whatever the heck the Italian word for "light" is.
Skim milk tends to bring out the bitter notes in espresso drinks. Between that and over-roasted beans, poor shots, and nasty syrup, it isn't any wonder that these drinks taste a little weird.
What kind of artificial sweetener does Starbucks use in their syrups anyway? I braved their site, but there is no mention of it.











I'm really confused with this whole skinny thing, for one reason: every now and then, when I run late and don't have time to make my own coffee at home, I stop by my local SB for a tall non-fat latte, no syrups of any kind. So, essentially, what is now called a skinny latte. It tasted alright. Ever since this whole "skinny" thing came about, the 2 tall nonfat lattes I have gotten there have tasted like ass. (Or what I imagine ass to taste like, to be more specific). The first one I thought was just a fluke, but the 2nd assy latte is pointing towards a trend. What could the difference be?