FCC Auction: Bidding Tops $4.7 Billion! We Have A Winner!
The New York Times is reporting that the auction for the C-block of wireless spectrum (Read: the Google part) has may have been won by someone... but we don't know who. Oh, the suspense!
All we know is that someone bid $4,713,823,000 and won. may have won.
Says the New York Times:
One thing is certain: because the C Block hit the $4.6 billion reserve price set by the Federal Communications Commission, certain rules will apply that will require the winning company to open its network to devices from competing companies.
Cool.
UPDATE: The NYT says it was wrong about there being a winner. Other companies can technically still bid, yadda, yadda. Oh well, we're still happy about the reserve price being met. We're all winners. The Times says:
This post was wrong in saying that rules prohibit anyone from bidding higher than $4.7 billion for the C block. There are some rather complex ways that another company could in fact raise the bid in coming days. I'll write a post explaining this later.
Spectrum Auction: The C-Block Bidding Is Over at $4.7 Billion [NYT]
(Photo:Getty)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
If you like numbers, there's always the direct source: [auctionbidding.fcc.gov]
Select Auction #73 in the "Public" section. Click around - there's a lot of info!
@themediatrix: Because Google makes cool stuff that works and frequently gives it away for free.
Yes, they know a little bit too much about you. But it's not like Verizon, AT&T, Microsoft, or anyone else for that matter would do any better by you with that information.
@themdiatrix: Because Google will most likely sell it on to someone else, in exchange for frequencies that are better suited for data. When they sell, they can add (further) stipulations to the use of the frequency. Hopefully these restrictions will keep the eventual owner from doing Bad Stuff to us.
@backbroken: No but those companies have a small slice. With google it's aggregated, and searchable too!
It's shameful that it is being sold. We the people of the United States use to own the airwaves. Now we don't. Tired of fees for everything? Selling our airwaves increases fees. Don't want equipment locked into a single provider. This assures it. Nothing owned by a corporation will ever come without a hook to you the consumer. Think about it.
@WhaDa: Yeah, and the strange thing is that most people think that more private ownership is good because it reduces taxes. However, we still pay and often we pay more to a private corporation. Of course, I suppose that you could say that stock ownership maintains a bit of ownership, but it does not offer the same potential influence.
@chalpin: Unless I'm reading this wrong - it looks like the auction is still ongoing.
Auction Description: 700 MHz Band
Dates: Opened: 01/24/2008
Closed:
Rounds Completed: 20
Bidding Days: 6
Total PWB Amount: $14,991,264,300
Licenses with PWBs: 1054
Number of PWBs: 1047
@edrift101: You're right, you know. There's still as many as six weeks of bidding to go. The only "news" is that the current high bid has reached the reserve price, so the title should read "We WILL have a winner!"
@edrift101: Indeed, it hasn't been won yet, it just passed the threshold that says it will have to be opened by whoever wins it.
It appears to be between two companies. That would be Verizon and Google. I think Verizon is too self serving to bid on an open netowrk. I mean, that would mean that consumers wouldn't be lockes in to crappy hardware, which, as we know is part of the mission statement of many companies. I suspect that this is Google, showing off their brassies. If this is the case, expect the markets to respond overwhelmingly positive, not because this is a good idea, but because many think that google has an uber crystal ball, and that they have optimism of some kind of economic recovery down the road. You read it here first.
@ogman: I'm somewhat aware (tor, right?) but unfortunately, lazy. Why should I have to do the work to keep them from tracking me? It should be the other way around - they should pay me to opt in.














I know I know I know! Is it... Microsoft? :-P