Take Your Brand And Shove It
Muji is a Japanese store that is, um, all the rage in NYC right now, apparently.
What do they sell? High-quality merchandise with no brand names. The international chain started in the 1980's as Mujirushi Ryohin ("no label, quality goods"), a sort of "house brand" within the Seiyu supermarket chain. The store became an independent company in 1989 and just opened its first location in the United States.
We'd be tempted to call Muji's popularity an ironic trend if it weren't for the pure and simple fact that people actually do want high-quality, well designed products.
It is perhaps a sign on the times that the conspicuous absence of a brand name is more of an endorsement than the "luxury" labels that are so often affixed to the same crap you buy at Walmart.
Who needs a "brand," anyway? If a store wants to build a reputation by offering quality products, we wish them the best of luck.
The Civilized World Finds a Refuge [New York Times]
(Photo:diametrik)
This is a test contextual ad for the SHOPPING category. It should appear on all SHOPPING entries, unless the subcategory has its own ad.
Post a comment
Comments:
I'm SO excited about a Muji opening in the US. The only other place in the US that you could get their products (until now) was the MOMA store. And it's true, their products are well-priced, high quality, and well designed, with function in mind rather than ugly logos splashed over everything. Slate had a good article about this: [www.slate.com]
@teqsun.com: i agree with you on AE...every piece of their clothing has that stupid bird, big-lettered AE, year, etc. They ruin a perfectly good piece of clothing b/c of their advertisement. I would only buy their jeans b/c there isnt any overt advertisement on them.
@ConsumptionJunkie: What's wrong with KMart? A few years ago, while I was in Korea, I found a set of Phillips over ear headphones. I found them in a Wal-Mart.
@teqsun.com: Those 'walking billboard' T-shirts (for high end designers) are cheaper than the rest of their product line for a reason.
Brands like American Eagle or Abercrombie & Fitch/Hollister rely on shameless branding because teens think it's so cool.
@num1skeptic: Well, you see, what they did there was...
"Take your brand and shove it" is spoken from the point of view of Muji to its more branded competitors (since their whole brand identity is about not being branded, if you will).
@num1skeptic: I think the idea is because they are located in New York.
"Got a problem with that? Shove it!"
Walmart > Kmart. I personally haven't set foot in Kmart for 6 years, where as I was in walmart like 2 weeks ago. But again Walmart is a rarity for me, just go there because the girlfriend likes it. I prefer target for my low priced crap.
@imdgonz: [www.eu-japan.gr.jp]
Doesn't go into detail, except that 80% of apparel is produced in China, while most of the production is done in "low cost countries".
This is just my speculation, but since quality is one of their stated goals and they keep their production in-house rather than outsourced, I don't think sweatshops are an issue. Plus, their primary method of cost reduction is economy of scale, rather than cutting corners. For what it's worth, they do at least pay lip service to social responsibility and suchlike.
I find it weird that Muji keeps the name Muji in the English-speaking world. To keep the sense of utter neutrality which accompanies a visit to their Japanese stores, they should call themselves "Brandless Goods." But I guess retaining some of the Japanese makes it edgy and cool. Oh well. Their stuff is indeed high quality.
SOunds good to me! I am all for buying good quality clothes (at reasonable prices) with little-known brand names! DO you have any idea how hard it is for me to find a decent baseball cap that doesnt have some logo or idiotic saying on it?
I love my 14 dollar wrangler or faded glory jeans I buy at walmart! CHeap & relatively decent quality (for me anyway).
INB4THEWALMART-BASHING
Regarding the slave labor issue: their primary business is stuff that can be machine made (stationery, home goods). Their clothes, though, seriously look like something you would find on a psych ward. They're very, very bland; as far as brandless clothing goes, I'm sold on Uniqlo and nothing will change that.
MUJI notebooks kick seven hundred thousand different kinds of ass, though. I buy them in vast quantitiies and still have change left over from a $20.
@Avery: FWIW, "Muji" isn't a generic word either (well, other than it being short for Mujirushi Ryohin).
And "Brandless Quality Goods" kinda loses the simple, clean quality of "Muji". And yeah, the whole J-chic thing. The store's a couple of blocks down from Uniqlo (who actually created a Japanese script logo specially for the NY store, ironically) who have also gone upscale for the US market.
I hadn't heard of this before but it's quite an interesting concept. It seems that what they're doing is substituting the Muji brand for the manufacturer's brand. This, in turn, probably provides a the store a bigger incentive to carry quality products and give the customers more reason to trust the store.
I hope "quality" isn't code for "we beat the living crap out of our workers if they don't do a good job".
I always wondered if sweatshops beat or abused workers if said sweatshops got complaints from the clients about shoddy craftsmanship.
@MRESTKO: There is no "manufacturer's brand." The comparison to KMart isn't really a literal one (ie. they don't sell third-party merchandise). Their product direction is overseen by design advisory board (Kenya Hara, their current design director, recently gave a talk in NYC) and they sometimes hire outside designers or design firms to work on products.
They're more like IKEA, only with a smaller, broader, higher-end, zen-like product line (and without the funny product names).
@MaxRC: I was wrong earlier when I said they keep their manufacturing in-house, but they do their own product development, so I don't think "replace otherwise individual brands with the overall Muji brand" is accurate either, since the products are created under the Muji brand identity, rather than for anyone else.
this jumped out at me:
.. perfectly fine T-shirts ($20.50) that make you wonder what exactly stores that sell $120 T-shirts want from you.
I'm puzzled that $20 t-shirts are a good deal, let alone that there are stores selling $120 t-shirts. Heck, I spent half that the last time I bought a sportcoat. I usually buy t-shirts at Old Navy for around $4, and feel kind of guilty when I spend $10 on one from shirt.woot
Reading the NY Times always makes me feel poor.
Muji is great. They are everywhere in London and whenever I go I have to stock up. They make great stationary, great notebooks. And their pens are simply the best pen you will ever use. I recommend the .5mm pen. Use it, you will want to buy ten. Their soaps are also great, mandarin is my favorite. And everything is dirt cheap.
Every single "stylish and unique" Muji thing I've ever seen... the things sold at the MoMA store, things featured on people's blogs, things like the metal pencil case mentioned in the article... those things have already been widely knocked-off in the US, with no particular recognizable brand attached to them, in places like the Target office supply department, The Container Store, the notebook aisle at Barnes and Noble or Borders.
Maybe there's something visibly unique about seeing it all in front of you in a Muji store, but even as someone who has gone through phases of being design-obsessed, I've never really understood the Cult of Muji. Their goods are so basic that they're easy to knock off, and have been commonly knocked off for at least the last 5 years, and as such, I don't think the chain is necessarily even needed in the US.
Once in a while I see something cool that they've made, though.
Maybe I'm missing the point of the article, but none of these sound like good prices or values...
"dark green corduroy button-front ($78), a soft washed-cotton blazer ($86.50) and perfectly fine T-shirts ($20.50)"
"brown brushed-cotton military-style jacket ($201.25)"
So what, it's a pricier Japanese H&M. NYC pretentiousness astounds me sometimes.
/Former New Yorker rant
@madanthony: Yeah, they make it seem like no one ever shops at places like Old Navy in NYC. Which makes me wonder who all those people are in the long-ass lines at Old Navy here. They're not all tourists.
As to the comment with H&M, I do like their stuff but stopped myself several times from picking something up because it was branded on the outside -- a kid's sport coat with a torn looking rugby crest, and a man's fall coat with junk lettering on the outside, etc.
In the early 80's when Izzod and Polo started putting their logos on their shirts I knew of several 'old money' types who continued to buy the clothes but had ripped out the logos before wearing them. In the end they moved on to other brands.
I adore Muji. I have several of their things that I got from MoMA and Ebay sellers (their bento box, for example, is an exercise in absolute design purity and perfection of function). No clothes yet, though. I'm dying, yes, absolutely expiring, for them to open one in the tony district just north of the Houston Galleria.
Of course, I love Ikea too... but that's just me, I've always loved this sort of thing.
This is just a me thing, but we got an Ikea in Atlanta not too long ago, and- just because it's Swedish designed doesn't make that great. Particle board is particle board, and I don't know how you associate "quality" with particle board, even if it has a funny name and looks sleek. If you really want something inexpensive and high quality, try a thrift store or consignment shop. Furniture made out of actual wood, with classic lines, for next to nothing, interesting vintage clothing, great vintage decor items- much better than new at a fraction of the cost.



























I agree with this idea 100% I have always hated being a walking billboard.
I don't need to advertise that I am part of the American Eagle Athletics Department since 1323 thank you.