Get $25 From The Credit Card Companies
You may be entitled to a cash prize if you had a Visa, MasterCard, or Diner's Club Cards during any time between February 1 1996 and November 8 2006. A successful class action lawsuit contended that credit card companies overcharged customers for foreign transactions and didn't disclose the fees well enough. You can apply for a straight $25 refund, 1% of estimated foreign transactions, or annual estimation refund of 1-3% of foreign transactions for which you have records . Claim your moneys by filling out forms that were mailed to you, going to ccfsettlement.com, or calling 1-800-945-9890. It is not is necessary to have actually conducted foreign transactions to claim the money.
CCFsettlement [via Snopes] (Thanks to Takkun!)
Credit Card Settlement [NYT]
(Photo: mariachily)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
I want to know how they're estimating the transactions for option #2. I lived abroad for a while, but don't have receipts from 5-6 years ago anymore.
Hell, I guess it's only a loss of a measly $25 even if they estimate it really low. I'll probably do it that way.
P.S. The lawyers, as always, are making an absolute killing on this. Remind me why I didn't go into antitrust law again? ^_^
I did conduct these foreign out of network transactions, and got a claim kit in the mail. I knew I was going to be gouged at the time and complained at the bank before I left the country. They told me they would find machines that didn't charge the extra fee. Except there weren't any in all of Ukraine.
I closed my accounts with BOA right after I got back.
@kimsama: yeah, I read the paperwork, they get like 30% of the big prize ($330M or so) and another big chunk from settling related suits into this one. All told the attorneys walk away with like $145M.
Are you sure its not necessary to have conducted foreign transactions? Because...
"Who may submit a claim?(top)
You may submit a claim if you made a foreign transaction between February 1, 1996 and November 8, 2006 with a U.S.-issued Visa-, MasterCard-, or Diners Club-branded card."
...is listed on the Claim form's FAQs. Admittedly, it could be clearer because elsewhere its more vague, but they do have a specific statement that eligibility is limited to people who made a foreign transaction between 1996 and 2006.
Nice, I got this in the mail last week and have been wondering whether or not it was legit. I have indeed conducted foreign transactiion during the specified time period so my conscience is clear ;)
I have the same question as Kimsama, though. I feel like I could get more than $25 but I don't have receipts or the like anymore.
@BStu: I think you may have had to make a foreign transaction to be eligible...
"If you made a transaction (purchase, cash advance, cash withdrawal or internet transaction) in a foreign currency on a Visa-, MasterCard- or Diners Club-branded credit, charge or debit/ATM card issued in the United States at any time from February 1, 1996 to November 8, 2006, you may be a member of the Settlement Damages Class. Members of the Settlement Damages Class may (1) ask for a refund and/or object to the settlement, OR (2) request to be excluded from the settlement. If you do not request to be excluded from the settlement, you will be bound by the settlement and you will release certain claims against the Defendants.
If you held a Visa-, MasterCard- or Diners Club-branded credit, charge or debit/ATM card issued in the United States as of November 8, 2006, you are a member of the Settlement Injunctive Class. If you are not also a member of the Settlement Damages Class, you may not ask for a refund or request to be excluded from the settlement. You may, however, object to the settlement."
I believe you must have made a foreign transaction as it clarifies there are two classes: a settlement damages class (where you must have made a foreign transaction) and a settlement injunctive class (regardless of if you made a foreign transaction). The only class that gets any money are the people that are part of the settlement damages class (which makes sense since they are the only ones who were monetarily effected by this).
I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice but just my own take on what I read.
@Takkun:
That was probably intentional. The more people they get to throw it out, the less they pay in settlement.
@GitEmSteveDave: Yes, since the credit companies charged the foreign currency fee Canada is included.
@gingerCE: After May of 08, which is when the approval hearing is. Save the link to their site if you think you'll have moved by then -- there's an address in the FAQ page to which you should send a letter with your new address.
@PatrickIs2Smart: Absolutely right, you needed to spend some dough to get the dough. Lucky for me, I actually only spent about $25 internationally...
@synergy:
No, you don't have to show receipts but I think you have to have a pretty good idea where you were and what you spent. There is a nice long paragraph of legal language re how to estimate.
@protest: I got the letter as well and thought it might be a scam even though it looked legit. I hadn't gotten a chance to look into it yet to see if it was. I'm glad to see this post on here confirming it.
@David Thomas: If all you do is claim your refund, your name will not show up as a plaintiff in online registries of actions (i.e., court dockets).
@Geekybiker: They have a form on there where you can document your foreign transactions and can be reimbursed based on expenses.
The lawyers will be "earning" $86,075,000 (27.5% of the $313,000,000 settlement) for this, not including their "expenses", which they insist will not be more than an extra $5,000,000.
Bastard lawyers like these, stealing dump trucks full of money, are the biggest reason why I'd enthusiastically endorse: "Tort reform, please!"
They've revised the settlement several times. At first they wanted me to tell them every credit card I had held since 1996. Given that I spent 5 of the ten years outside the US I was not impressed. Now they just want dates, which is better, although the level of recompense goes up if you give them detailed information. Which I'm sure all of you could find in your files - every purchase made on every credit card you've held since 1996. Argh.
@speedwell: But did you pay with some method other than Paypal? I am pretty sure that Paypal will probably count as a domestic charge.
@aparsons: if you still have statements, submit for the full amount you spent. That's what I'm doing! I studied abroad during this time period, and I spent about $4500 on my credit cards. Even if I just get back 1%, that's still $45 -- much better than the silly $25 flat fee back.
I'm super excited by this! I'm starting a job search soon (finishing up grad school) and can totally use this money.
@MalcoveMagnesia:
The credit card companies in this suit illegally overcharged their customers to the tune of about a billion dollars, and yet the problem you see here is the lawyers fees?
Who's the "bastard" in all of this? I'd say its not so much the attorneys that took the time to argue and prove the companies broke the law as it is the companies who, well, broke the law.
Somehow, passing a "tort deform" law to stop the lawyers from policing the companies in the first place doesn't exactly make me think the companies will magically start behaving themselves.
If you want to get down to it, do the math. This fee makes Visa and its banks $1.2 Billion each year, of which $.8 Billion is allegedly in violation of the law. Run that over a 10 year period, and consider triple damages and fines for violating various laws, and that stacks up to a very conservative guess of at least $10 Billion in liability. If anything, the lawyers are suckers for settling so low...
No the real "bastards" here are the law-breaking credit card companies. Apologizing for them and trying to blame the lawyers who catch them with their fingers in the till just makes people wonder why you're shilling for the bad guys.



















Is that David Prager in the picture?